|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:29 PM Original message |
Army manipulated general's photo (Dunwoody) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. They also added a penis. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ben_meyers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Really? I'll bet her husband was surprised! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:37 PM Response to Original message |
2. So the AP does have standards occasionally? Who knew. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Auggie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:43 PM Response to Original message |
3. They smoothed her complexion, enhanced the eye color, and did a bad job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fed_Up_Grammy (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. Oh,so what! It's done all the time. Jeez !!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
9. So, If you deliberately publish a lie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fed_Up_Grammy (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 09:14 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. It's background for a picture---no more,no less. FDR kept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catnhatnh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
18. Yes and it was wrong though arguably neccesary.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
struggle4progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:32 AM Response to Reply #12 |
23. Keeping Alive a Myth About FDR (LTTE WaPo 2005) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheWraith (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
22. I tend to agree that this is much ado about nothing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Backwoodsrider (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. frankly I'd prefer the woman in original photo guiding the troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Backwoodsrider (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. frankly I'd prefer the woman in original photo guiding the troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor Cynic (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. So US Military Photoshop technology can't fool people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GP6971 (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:52 PM Response to Original message |
8. And the point is.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:53 PM Response to Original message |
10. Deleted message |
ogneopasno (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. Oh, come on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bertman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 10:57 PM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Just trying to point out the absurdity of this whole "issue". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PittPoliSci (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 08:59 PM Response to Original message |
11. original looks way better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 09:24 PM Response to Original message |
13. Seems like a rather non-issue, to be honest... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harmonicon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 09:39 PM Response to Original message |
15. strange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 10:04 PM Response to Original message |
16. The US military is just practising. Soon they'll be able to photoshop back to life |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tclambert (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
17. Hey, if I'm ever promoted to four stars, you know some 2nd lieutenant is gonna pretty up my pictures |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bette Noir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-14-08 11:35 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. I'd dwant my real photo used, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truthisfreedom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 03:20 AM Response to Original message |
24. Something else is going on here. This has nothing to do with the issue they're presenting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ohio2007 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 09:16 AM Response to Reply #24 |
25. more like ignoring a goal obtained by a woman and make it sound like the army thought she |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #24 |
26. I like it when someone is wearing more tinfoil than even me |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth Teller (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 10:32 AM Response to Original message |
27. That fake photo is obvously, well, fake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
28. I don't see the problem here - it's not a news photo, it's a publicity photo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:38 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC