Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army manipulated general's photo (Dunwoody)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:29 PM
Original message
Army manipulated general's photo (Dunwoody)
Edited on Fri Nov-14-08 08:44 PM by Newsjock
Source: Associated Press

The Associated Press on Friday suspended the use of photos provided by the Defense Department after the Army distributed a digitally altered photo of the U.S. military's first female four-star general.

The image of Army Gen. Ann E. Dunwoody is the second Army-provided photo the AP has eliminated from its service in the last two months.

The AP said that adjusting photos and other imagery, even for aesthetic reasons, damages the credibility of the information distributed by the military to news organizations and the public.

... In the original photo, the general appears to be sitting at a desk with a credenza and bookshelf behind her. Three stars on her uniform identify her as a lieutenant general, her rank before Friday's promotion.

The altered photo, distributed by the Army and run on the AP's photo wire Thursday, shows Dunwoody in fatigues in front of an American flag. Her rank, affixed to the front of a soldier's tunic, is not visible.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/11/14/national/w161758S09.DTL&tsp=1



Fake photo:
Original photo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. They also added a penis. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Really? I'll bet her husband was surprised!
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. So the AP does have standards occasionally? Who knew. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. They smoothed her complexion, enhanced the eye color, and did a bad job
in the outlining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh,so what! It's done all the time. Jeez !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. So, If you deliberately publish a lie...
you are a liar, and if you accidentally publish a lie and stand by it you are tarnished. It's about honesty and defending ones reputation and has been sadly lacking for some time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fed_Up_Grammy Donating Member (923 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. It's background for a picture---no more,no less. FDR kept
the American public in the dark about his physical condition for many years.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Yes and it was wrong though arguably neccesary....
this is a deception without ANY purpose and therefore even worse. It cannot become acceptable to publish known falsehoods whether verbal or visual. Truth is a papers only currency and to debase it for any reason is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 02:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. Keeping Alive a Myth About FDR (LTTE WaPo 2005)
Keeping Alive a Myth About FDR
Saturday, April 23, 2005; Page A17

The myth that Franklin D. Roosevelt's partial paralysis from polio was kept secret from the public that elected him president four times will apparently never die. It has been given a new lease on life by the History Channel's documentary about FDR as well as by media coverage of the film in The Post and elsewhere.

In reality, the basic facts about his condition were known to anyone who read the press closely. For example, in the course of a long, sympathetic 1932 profile of the prospective presidential candidate, Time magazine detailed his being stricken with polio, his partial recovery and his subsequent creation of the Warm Springs Foundation. "Swimming at Warm Springs several months each year and special exercises at Albany have made it possible for the Governor to walk 100 feet or so with braces and canes," Time explained. "When standing at crowded public functions, he still clings precariously to a friend's arm." In November of the same year, Time reported, "At Worcester, Mass., Governor Roosevelt picked Catherine Murphy, 9, also a cripple from infantile paralysis, to send at his own expense to Warm Springs, Ga., for treatment." While the White House understandably did not emphasize his disability, pictures of the president showing his leg braces frequently appeared in the press ...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10679-2005Apr22.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. I tend to agree that this is much ado about nothing.
They took an existing photo and made it more flattering in place of making the effort to produce a formal, professional file photo. So? Nobody expects file photos to document newsworthy information--they're strictly for reference purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Backwoodsrider Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. frankly I'd prefer the woman in original photo guiding the troops
Seeing her face made me think 'barbed wire'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Backwoodsrider Donating Member (9 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. frankly I'd prefer the woman in original photo guiding the troops
Seeing her face made me think 'barbed wire'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor Cynic Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. So US Military Photoshop technology can't fool people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GP6971 Donating Member (131 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the point is....
What? I really don't care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. Oh, come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Just trying to point out the absurdity of this whole "issue".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PittPoliSci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. original looks way better
she looks jaundiced in the first one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Regret My New Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
13. Seems like a rather non-issue, to be honest...
Although, I think the original looks better anyways. The edited one reminds me too much of those people on the internet who think they are "artist" because they can run images through photoshop filters. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. strange
It seems like they were trying to make her look better, or more neutral, but the original photo is a lot better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. The US military is just practising. Soon they'll be able to photoshop back to life
all the dead troops.



Yes, TRUTH is ALWAYS important. LIES are the slippery slope.

Thank you AP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tclambert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hey, if I'm ever promoted to four stars, you know some 2nd lieutenant is gonna pretty up my pictures
or I'll transfer his ass to the coldest, loneliest weather station in Greenland. And no Victoria's Secret catalogs! Make me look younger! And get rid of the bags under my eyes! And put a flag behind me! You saw the movie, Patton? That's what I want.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. I'd dwant my real photo used,
but one taken 25 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
24. Something else is going on here. This has nothing to do with the issue they're presenting.
It feels like a coordinated effort between the DD and AP to make an excuse for not publishing any military photos... probably because something is about to be released regarding Abu Ghraib.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. more like ignoring a goal obtained by a woman and make it sound like the army thought she
was photo shopped for fugly.
just as many of the posters here have assumed.:eyes:

or, you could be correct as her connection to the Abu Ghraib dereliction of duty may be connected with her promotion.

Wasn't she the one in charge during the GI photo shoots ?

maybe not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. I like it when someone is wearing more tinfoil than even me
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 10:27 AM by Newsjock
But, dagblastit, it sounds like you might actually have a point there. Fascinating speculation! If "torture photos" are in the news soon, we'll know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth Teller Donating Member (479 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. That fake photo is obvously, well, fake
That's a bad job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. I don't see the problem here - it's not a news photo, it's a publicity photo
Sounds to me that the AP is engaged in some asinine posturing, perhaps playing CYA for the last 8 years of incompetence. I.e., "Sure, we swallowed everything hook, line, and sinker and failed to do any due diligence or basic investigating for the past 8 years, but now we have standards, dammit!"

Trying to build a foundation for the next 4 years of biased anit-Obama 'reporting'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC