Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China considers buying GM and Ford

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
antimatter98 Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:18 PM
Original message
China considers buying GM and Ford
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Welcome to the United States of China.
Egad! Will it ever end? Please, Dems & Obama, save us from ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
59. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
81. Um, GM and Ford are publically traded companies on an International level.
So, uh, technically, they are not "American" in the view of ownership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #81
89. The Chinese can buy Ford but they can NOT control Ford.
When Henry Ford died, his family spent a good bit of money on how to divide his stock up so their would retain control AND sell stock. While non-voting stock had existed for decades, the Ford family took it to new heights. Yes, the Chinese can buy GM voting Stock and Ford Non-voting Common stock, but not the Voting stock, that is held by the Ford Family.

As early as WWII, over 94% of Ford Stock was "non-Voting", the remaining 6% was controls by the family members who ran the company.
http://books.google.com/books?id=fMDZKHnYMScC&pg=PA235&lpg=PA235&dq=Ford+non-voting+stock&source=web&ots=-5b18doZKF&sig=KfE4bntFPpX1uUObMwQ3jAWADmI&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result

The Ford Family still controls 40% of the Voting Stock and this with an investment that equals just 5% of the total equity in Ford.
http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/EFX_dll/EDGARpro.dll?FetchFilingHTML1?ID=1066742&SessionID=g70iWeDu1WEpXP7

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B02E7DD1631F936A25757C0A9669C8B63&sec=&spon=&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink

So the Chinese may be able to buy GM via its stock, buy Chrysler from the investors who own it and buy Ford Common Stock, without the co-operation of the Ford family they can never control Ford. They can Control Gm and Chrysler but not Ford.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Geesh. That will be real helpful if we go to war with China & need to build tanks.
We NEED a domestic manufacturing sector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I thought General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman made those?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angleae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
61. They do, but Chrysler designed them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Well, that might be a deterrent to launching "pre-emptive" wars. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
37. It means China wouldn't risk going to war with us, or we'd "confiscate" their plants...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Good point. I didn't think of that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Why the hell would anyone want to go to war with anyone
as long as mutually-beneficial 'business' is being done?

- Unless, of course, fanatics, religious or otherwise, which most Chinese people clearly are not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeoConsSuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #37
55. I don't see the Chinese as a threat to world peace
I can't say the same for my country based on the last eight years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #55
76. You may want to ask S. Korea about that. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #76
78. Why? Because of what happened 55 years ago under Chairman Mao?
The initial invasion of South Korea at the beginning of that war was by the North Korean army. China didn't join the war until the UN forces counterinvaded North Korea and got close to the border with China.

The current Chinese government has got little to do with how things were in China 50 years ago, other than they still call themselves "communist". That apparently is just for old times sake, since there is nothing "communist" about the way China is today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #78
80. Talking about their support for NK today. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trudyco Donating Member (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #37
82. Not if they move it to china like they have with other purchases -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
62. If "We" Go To War Against China That Would Make Tanks Irrelevant
It would be a nuclear exchange.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ergo, no bankruptcy and no bail-out.
Edited on Thu Nov-20-08 01:23 PM by no_hypocrisy
Aren't you glad China isn't as communist as it used to be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tismyself Donating Member (501 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Can we apologize
for our colonial tantrum (we do love to apologize) and give ourselves back to England now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks george,
you've really gone and done it now. Wanna know how history is going to judge you? It ain't going to be pretty. What's next, Saudi Arabia going to buy Oregon, or North Carolina maybe? Will the workers have to learn Chinese? What a bunch of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
60. Thanks republican voters too!
We got a pResident you idiot fundie freaks would like to have a beer with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
7. They're just looking for a product they can make
that will enable them to use all this excess plastic they seem to have. They already tried getting rid of it in the food they shipped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibinMo Donating Member (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. I've given up Budweiser
since the Belgium company buyout. Now my car????

My Focus is 8 years old and I was hoping to replace it next Spring. I hope they stay away from Ford.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sub Atomic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #8
36. That's quite reactionary, don't you think?
Budweiser is still brewed in the U.S. Your refusal to continue to buy their products may cost an American a job.

And if China buys GM/Ford/Chrysler, those vehicles will continue to be made here as well.

Xenophobia isn't the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
46. Xenophobia - you're kidding right?
You have no problem with a sizeable chunk of our manufacturing base being sold to overseas interests, but most people I think would take great exception to it and for very good reasons, not a single one having to do with the overused-to-triteness 'xenophobia.'

Do you rent your house or own it? If you own it I think you should sell it to China and have them rent it back to you. You shouldn't have any problem with that, right?

Then, after you're all settled in with the new landlords, come back and give us a report about how well you like the new arrangement. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
52. 'xenophobic' seems right to me
the difference is that a board based in Belgium controls the company, with more Belgian shareholders. The US has to finance its trade deficit somehow - either by selling the extensive interests it has owned overseas for years (did you expect all the locals to boycott all those American-owned companies, like Ford in Europe, or Opel, or Vauxhall?) , or selling some assets in the USA, or borrowing money from foreigners.

The objection here seems to be to foreign managers. Yes, I'd say that's xenophobia. I spent 12 years working in the UK for an American-owned company. Are you saying I should have refused, because any subsidiary outside of the country of origin is a bad thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Telly Savalas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #46
53. We don't own the Big 3 and we didn't own Budweiser
These businesses are/were owned largely by very rich individuals who don't have any more concern for the interests of American workers than the new Chinese owners would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #53
84. Try explaining that to the class unaware - they support "their" capitalists
It would be laughable if it wasn't so tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. thats why they created this crash, to sell off th last national security we possess to Bu$h Commie
cronies.. and let the banks buy up the mortgage industry.. i remember when Bank of America wanted to buy a mortgage company before this manufactured crash and the government wouldn't let them..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. That's what the shock doctrine is all about. Force a crisis, then sell off
everything, including national treasures to foreign investors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thank you, Future Masters! Thank You! Thank You! Thank You! (Everyone grovel!)
Chinese lessons anyone?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. If I wasn't working so hard on my Japanese...
I would love to learn Mandarin.. or even Korean. I don't think anyone will be forced
to learn Chinese. Japanese companies have come here and no one was forced to learn Japanese,
however, the amount of people who love anime, and manga, now want to learn Japanese and that's so
cool.

First Mandarin lesson!! "Nihao ma!" How are you.. and o yeah,
"xie xie" (pronouced shay shay!) That means "Thank you!".

I think its great to take up a second language !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
48. Michael Phelps wanted to learn Chinese before the Olympics,
so he got Rosetta Stone. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sixmile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. 3,000,000+ people won't care where their check comes from
China, Detroit, the Moon - as long as they get paid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
13. Dammit the Chinese are going to OWN us if we don't act!!
Cons has literally put us into the position where the Chinese can simply buy our land and our factories and engineer a coup! We are in for a real struggle, and we need to form a united front to succeed. Higher wages drive the economy but it has to come with trade policies to protect domestic labor.

We have to reverse course REALLY QUICK! We need to pass card-check, enact fair trade policies, impose tariffs on products made with cheap foreign labor, and GET BACK ON OUR FEET!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
72. Sounds like the 80s when the cry was the Japanese were going to own us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #72
79. Got to watch out for those hard working Asians, you know.
(Not that I am alleging any xenophobia about that.) :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #72
86. It is the same.
The xenophobia here is disconcerting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. "This not your father's donkey cart."
DongFeng Malibu - "A Chinese Revolution."

"Ping pong, fried rat, Nian Gao and DongFeng."


( I apologize for the crassness of this post.... )





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. So what industry do we get to buy in China?
oh lawd. Is this what globalization really means?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. The hat pin and buggy whip industries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Yep, them with the financial leverage, own the globe.
Bought right out from underneath the people living on it. How long until we start getting evicted from "our" land so the Chinese people can move here when they have no more room in China?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. Yep. For many decades after WWII it was us who had the financial leverage
and the rest of the world groused about it. Not any more. Thanks, George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
85. You get the prize for the most ridiculous post on this thread.
(Unless my sarcasm detector is completely broken.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. From all of the anti labor rhetoric I have been reading in some of these posts, I would imagine that
some here might think this is a great development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Maybe they'll give us a break on the money we owe them for the Iraq war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
19. Stick a fork in the U.S., it's done if this happens.
:puke:

:grr:

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. The U.S. of Communist China. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #20
50. For Communists, they are damn good at taking advantage of capitalist dumbfucks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D-Lee Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. Those financial wizards who shipped jobs overseas and increased imports
Ah ANOTHER "forgot to consider the consequences" ...

Exactly what did they think China and similar countries were going to do with the money we were giving them? Especially with the creeping devaluation of the dollar?

Utterly foreseeable ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
23. Won 't that be perfect....
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. This Country is over if this happen. Just a scary society we are living in.
Yes to Banks, F/U to Union car makers. Who runs the country? Millionaire and Billionaire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
27. America is finished. This is the worst country in the industrialized world. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
29. Oh. Dear. God. I think Congress needs a bit of nudging with torches and pitchforks!
WTF? :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. This should actually kill the bailout
Even if the Treasury hands Detroit a fat wad of cash, the stocks of GM and Ford could be bought up on the open market. No, it won't be for the paltry $1-2 a share they're priced at now, if any major buyer came in and tried to buy it all, the price would rise dramatically. Even if these Chinese firms bought half of GM and Ford, that would make the bailout seem to be supporting an overseas firm. You may as well give breaks to the Japanese and European corporations that have manufacturing plants here.

They'll just loot the assets, file Chapter 7, fire the workers, and use the dealership networks to sell Melanine-mobiles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
30. Don't fret, DUers!!! We still have the "Cuban Blockade"™
We still have some "godless commie bastards"™ to push around!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aldo Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. Hey, we're being colonized!
The Ratfucklicans and their water carriers have sold us out, again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. and Tata of India bought Jaguar last year, a little reverse colonialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
34. Meh, the chinese have been measuring the drapes for a long time now...
however, they are having their own financial problems.

However, I do believe that the congress would prevent this sale from going through. I'm not that worried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musiclawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
35. I kinda predicted this in an Edmunds thread
way back when Cerberus (sp?) was buying Chrysler. I though their intent all along was to hold and sell to Cherry or Hyundai and that Ford /GM might then be willing to be bought by the Chinese. So I was sort of right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm not sure this would be a BAD thing...

Inject their capital into our businesses.

It would then be in China's best interest for the U.S. economy to thrive.


They would NEVER go to war with us, because we'd just take over their "means of production" and make it our own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #38
66. Ha ha
China has controlled the means of productions for decades.
Forget cars, they're a luxury, period. Go to a hardware store and try to get a part to fix your toilet or sink, or anything else, that isn't made in China.
China could shut this country down overnight, all manufacturing of essentials is now in China and has been for many years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
39. We don't think it is bad that Japanese companies (Toyota, Honda, Nissan) own plants in U.S.
...and hire U.S. workers...

Why would it be bad if China owned the big three?


They'd probably run the companies better than the current management.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
43. Pure fearstruck xenophobia, ain't it.
Think I'll replay those opening scenes of Blade Runner again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dreamnightwind Donating Member (863 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 05:04 AM
Response to Reply #39
68. NOT!
I'm sure our Chinese overlords will treat workers with nothing but respect and reverence. NOT!

What's up with people here, don't they see what's going down? This country has been looted, and the vultures are ready to pick through the bones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #68
73. Japanese management seems to treat their workers well here. Why would the Chinese
treat workers here any differently? I should point out that American management doesn't always treat their workers with respect and reverence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sofa king Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
44. As a former Reagan Youth Cold Warrior, I say take 'em please, China.
Really. I had a mullet and everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
45. this is exactly what we don't want - please
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
47. This Might be the Best Solution
There seem to be no American Iacoccas now, so let someone else try to implement a successful business plan for GM. The Chinese are tough, and they won't allow waste or inefficiencies.

And don't worry that they're going to increase outsourcing. Auto components are already outsourced, and the Chinese would be buying the companies with the intention of increasing their presence in the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
49. "... have the capability and intention to buy some assets..."
"Even a hundred billion $ would barely dent China’s more than $2t in currency reserves."

....see what happens when you manufacture wealth instead of pushing paper and consuming it?....is everybody ready for some healthy protectionism?

....I know, I know, the Communist Chinese are a fine group of hard-working people, but damn it, we're talking about saving American icons, symbols of the good-old USA....a Chinese Chevy just wouldn't be a Chevy....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
51. not going to happen. if you follow the money, the relationship goes the other way.
countries don't buy up countries; "investors" do.

the investors that are busy moving their capital to the developing world.

gm was created by finance capital; it's a shell.

it was never "ours".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
54. We gave them money so they could destroy are way of life
its the ultimate screw job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
56. If this happens, then I definitely will buy Toyota or Nissan.
They'll export most of the jobs to southern China, and ship us toxic, crap cars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
57. NO. NO. NO. NO.
If Obama lets this go through, I will do everything possible to get rid of him in 2012, if we still have a country.

BYW, it's GM and Chrysler, not Ford.

IMHO, this is a matter of national security, and if Washington thought that they'd get away with the Dubai ports deal, they haven't seen anything yet.

Even many union busters will draw the line at selling to China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
58. Yes, and after that, CitiBank. We LOVE shopping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
63. That Might Be Very Good News: China Rescues U.S. Capitalism
Why would they do that?

1. Because they are the only nation that can.

2. Because a global depression would have a huge impact on Chinese capitalism. It would be stopped dead in its tracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hans Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
64. Ya, so why don't we (the U.S. gov't) buy them? Lot cheaper than the bailout. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-08 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Because Free Capitalist Market Fanatics Oppose Nationalization
of industry .... excluding of course banks and financial service companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cambie Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
67. Relax
The time to act is long past. We borrowed a lot of gas money from China to give to Saudi. We had fun while it lasted didn't we? The rest is inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 06:37 AM
Response to Original message
69. If true, this is good news
The current financial catastrophe was caused in part by trade imbalances between China and the US, with China having no outlet to recycle their dollars into anything "real" and hence that money was only recycled into paper -- t-bills and mortgage backed securities -- which led to the bubble and doubts about the dollar.

If China were allowed to recycle its money back into the US through direct investment -- the way the Japanese, Europeans and Saudis have -- those imbalances would be ameliorated.

We would be an economic colony for a while, but we've been one often in the past, and this too shall pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
70. sell sell sell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
71. China? That the place that makes all the stuff!
Well I guess the USA still rocks the cartoons!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
74. Market cap of Ford is only 3.25 billion right now. Dollar store prices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
75. Yeah, scary. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
77. If ...IF China does it... what's stopping them from merging FORD&GM
and eliminating the UAW ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
83. Sounds like a baseless rumor to prop up GM/Chrysler share prices
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
87. It might be the best thing for GM and Ford.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-08 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
88. The problem is when you keep giving them dollars eventually they want to buy something.
And eventually what they can buy is any damn thing they want. If we expect the dollar to continue to hold any value we can't give it to people when we buy something from them and then tell them what they can or cannot buy with them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC