Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reporters were given 20 minutes each to look at Bush's medical records

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:08 PM
Original message
Reporters were given 20 minutes each to look at Bush's medical records
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 10:10 PM by NNN0LHI
Just now on CNN's Newsnight. Had to go into a room take a peek and get the heck out ASAP. Whats with this stuff? I thought we were going to be able to see them? Guess not.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. 20 minutes to see how many pages?
Jesus, George, what are you afraid of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillParkinson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Why should this be a problem?
Once you get past all the blacked out pages there should only be a paragraph or two left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. 400 pages
is what I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SadEagle Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. CNN.com does say ~400 pages...
They also say, right in the blurb:

"None of the documents relate to service between May 1972 to May 1973, when Bush transferred from Texas to Alabama."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Bwahahahahaha!! This bullet is too big to dodge!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. And they said this was EVERYTHING?
And reporters got a big, fat, whole 20 minutes to look through 400 pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
26. No
The various news orgs who were reporting on this said that the documents released publicly amounted to around 400 pages. If they gave a specific number of pages in the medical records that were not released and could only be viewed behind closed doors, I didn't hear it. I doubt it was as many as 400 though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChompySnack Donating Member (612 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. PR-Nightmare for them if the press doesn't let it pass
They are forgeries and letting them out would expose that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. Your kidding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Then What Was That Stack Terry Moran Was Holding on WNT?
Edited on Fri Feb-13-04 10:18 PM by Crisco
A Prop? Heehee.

Or did I just hallucinate him standing with a two-inch-thick wad of papers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Those weren't the medical records
The medical records are being kept under lock and key. He said that someone was coming out of the W.H., summoning each reporter to take a peek at the medical records. David Gregory said so on Hardball, I think it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Insider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. really?
'cuz "BUSH ORDERED THE RELEASE OF ALL MILITARY RECORDS"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. This seems to be sticking
It has been on the news constantly. Too bad for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poppabear36 Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. yeah, like -
No WMD's, Halliburton ripping off American tax payers, Cheney's secret energy meetings, Bush failure to prevent 9-11, Bush stonewalling 9-11 committee.
Uhm - do you want me to continue?
This issue goes to character.
Once Joe Publis sees the issue of Bush's character, he no longer gets a pass on any of these other issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shadder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Oh look, another one
I'd welcome you, but what's the point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. Supposedly
they released 400 pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mouse7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-04 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
16. All the medical records are pre-1972, not needed anyway
Nobody has really questioned what Dumbya did prior to his refusal to take a drug test in 1972. There are no medical records after Dumbya refused his flight physical. This situation will not turn on the investigation of said medical records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. All pre-1972? I would have sworn that a doctor's exam was required
for separation from service. Maybe that was just retirement, but I think it was ANY separation.

In fact, I remember it being one of the things that could hold you over your ETS date. No medical records clearance, no ETS. If your medical records were 'lost', they had to be reconstructed BEFORE separation.

Hmmmm.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #20
33. You can waive it for normal discharges
They do encourage you (very, very strong encouragement) to take the preseparation physical if you're getting out on Chapter 4 (separation due to completion of obligated service--the standard "you did your four years, thank you very much, good luck in your civilian career" discharge most people receive) or Chapter 16 (force reduction due to overstrength), but any other chapter of the Administrative Separations regulation or any chapter of the Medical Separations reg requires it.

It's very hard to claim service-connected medical problems after discharge if you don't take the physical, which is why it's so recommended.

However, if you choose to waive the physical, they send you and your records to a doctor. He looks through them and decides whether you can waive the physical--if you were on sick call once every six weeks, he'll probably say no. If you never went on sick call, he'll probably say yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
17. So they should make the most outrageous claims possible. . .
about what they think they saw, and force BushCo to prove them wrong.

Later, they can claim the brevity of the initial look confused them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. Seriously- How many times can they make this claim?
How many times have we heard that this is all the documents?
5? 6? It's amazing how childish this has become.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
21. I hope the reporters had a strategy going in...like they each look at
however many pages and the next person looks at the next pages, etc. At the end they could compare notes. This sounds like it would never happen, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. You beat me to it.
Great minds, etc....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
22. Maybe they didn't want them to notice any failed drug tests
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
23. NBC News tonight made an interesting point.
That when the White House releases something newsworthy on a Friday afternoon it is usually something they would rather not disclose at all. They pointed out that when something hits the media late on Friday it won't get much coverage on Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 09:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
35. I don't think that the Friday news dump trick works anymore.
What is happening lately, is that they try to bury this stuff by releasing it late in the day on Friday. It peculates around on the internet, where it either gets verified or discredited. By Monday, if the story still holds up to scrutiny it makes it into the mainstream press.

Besides, the WH is no longer in control of the news cycle. This story and all their other scandals are now coming to a head and the public is finally waking up. Everyday is another major revelation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
24. Here's the link to what's in the papers
Edited on Sat Feb-14-04 02:56 AM by kskiska
Many Gaps in Bush's Guard Records

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A40964-2004Feb13.html

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=364127


Then there is his medical history, set out in more detail than many Americans might want to know. He had his tonsils removed as a young boy, had appendicitis when he was 10 and at 14 had an operation to remove a cyst from his chest, leaving a scar. At the time he applied for entrance into the guard, he had a hemorrhoid, the location of which was charted with military precision.

more…
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/02/14/politics/14MILI.html?ex=1077426000&e ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
25. MSNBC reported this morning-- no records from the critical
period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. CNN reported the same thing just a few minutes ago n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
29. Anybody else getting Watergate Flashbacks from this?
Are you hearing the sound of stonewalling? Is someone from the regime being allowed to twist slowly, slowly in the wind yet?

Does the phrase "I am not a crook" begin to ring any bells?

:evilgrin:
dbt

(The hell of it is that the press has been in bu$h's back pocket for so long that they may let him skate yet again!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #29
36. More like Floodgate this time
And unfortunately they are the Floodgates of Hell that are being opened this time.

The Watergate scandal was contained to the WH. Floodgate is of global proportions. This is just the tip of the iceberg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 07:44 AM
Original message
## Support Democratic Underground! ##
RUN C:\GROVELBOT.EXE

This week is our first quarter 2004 fund drive.
Please take a moment to donate to DU. Thank you
for your support.

- An automated message from the DU GrovelBot


Click here to donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishnfla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
30. This Calhoun guy is on our front page this am (Daytona paper)
69 years old, freshly and copiously Grecian formula'd up for the big race! Claims he saw the chimp 6 times between May and Oct. '72. Bragging how he voted for -gulp-Goldwater! Complain how his revelation is ruining his weekend (Daytona 500)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. Why does someone read training manuals at a postal unit?
Does that make any sense?

the F102 had already been decommissioned. I understand that TM's an such are still put out for maintenance reasons and the like but how much reading could there be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
31. This seems really familiar
...OK someone with a better memory... isn't this what happened with Iraq's weapons program files? Fill in the gaps for me, if you remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-04 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. Reminds me of the 5 minutes enviro groups got about the Energy policy
The story came out that Dick didn't even meet with enviromental and consumer groups to discuss his energy policy. Dick sent staffers to talk to each group, or to have 5 minutes each, in a room with several of them and they hadn't even been given the policy as it was at that stage to comment on . They basically came in and read their mission statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC