Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Bush pardons Brooklyn home scammer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-23-08 11:55 PM
Original message
President Bush pardons Brooklyn home scammer
Source: New York Daily News

President Bush pardoned a Brooklyn real estate developer accused of scamming hundreds of poor, minority homebuyers - and whose father donated $28,500 to the Republican Party this year.

Bush pardoned Isaac Toussie, 36, two days before Christmas in a gesture of mercy that outraged ex-customers who said they were duped into buying overpriced, defective homes.

"We're in the middle of a mortgage crisis this is somebody who was alleged to have participated in predatory lending practices," said Peter Seidman, a lawyer who represents 460 people who say they were fleeced.

"To pardon Isaac Toussie is a kick in the teeth to homeowners struggling with mortgages they can't afford."

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2008/12/23/2008-12-23_president_bush_pardons_brooklyn_home_sca.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. He also pardoned a bunch of people in for pot "crimes."
No, he should never have pardoned Toussie, but I guess if there's a GOP contributor involved and Toussie only ripped off poor folks...

Uh, :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrynXX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. and still no Leonard Peltier :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 09:01 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. Now there's a reason
I could have strangled Clinton with a smile on my face.

Peltier will likely rot in prison until the FBI guys who railroaded him are all gone to their great reward in the sky.

We can't disgrace them, you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. Thanks for remembering him too Warpy .
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WriteDown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. I am so glad there are others who remember him.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Can someone give me a good reason for the pardon power
I guess it's a check on the judiciary, but one person vs. a panel of judges or a jury?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Don Siegelman.
Edited on Wed Dec-24-08 12:23 AM by pnwmom
Of course, Bush would never pardon someone who was railroaded, like him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud progressive Donating Member (358 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. you're god-damn right i'll give you a good reason.
so the whores in any party can reward their tricks. need i say more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. I think it should be limited
I think the founding fathers had nothing but kind motives when they put this in the Constitution. But it's been abused far too often - such as with Ford and his unholy deal with Nixon. And now Bush is sticking his middle finger up at us with his pardon powers. I think there needs to be some sort of limitations on the ability of any President to pardon others. Such as requiring them to wait a certain amount of time, requiring that those found guilty of crimes are required to serve a portion of their sentence, and so on.

I know it would take a Constitutional amendment, but that sounds like a much better amendment than writing bigotry into the Constitution through some marriage amendment (which is the favorite fantasy of 75% of the GOP).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. It's a throw back to royalty. Not a check or a balance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 04:54 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. That's precisely what the anti-federalists said about it
I take it you aren't a Hamilton fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #21
38. I'm more of a Jeffersonian
by nature.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Benjamin Franklin is my personal favorite
He was ahead of his time on slavery and other issues. Hamilton was too authoritarian, although right about the need for a strong federal government. And Jefferson while very correct about individual liberties and separation of church and state had a ridiculous vision for the American economy that involved slaughtering Native Americans and slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #41
47. Yes, Ben Franklin. "The only dead president who was never president!"
They were 100 years into the 200 years Indian Wars, as well as a good 100 years into plantation economy in the south at the time.


I was speaking of the authoritarian/libertarian (classical libertarian with a small l) dichotomy more than a literal endorsement of hero worship, although I'm sure they both had their strong partisans at the time.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
20. Alexander Hamilton argues for it in Federalist #74...
Essentially saying that justice is too cruel if the law must be applied blindly without the ability to make exceptions for certain circumstances. Additionally he felt it would be expedient for the President to have the power so that he could negotiate with potential rebellions promising them clemency, which Washington actually did with the Whiskey Rebellion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
44. Yeah but as we have seen with Nixon, Reagan and Bush Sr
its also been used to cover up the crimes of the president and making him nearly immune from facing punishment for crimes he might commit while in office, makes me wonder if the founding fathers considered it being used in such a manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sarah Ibarruri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
29. It needs to be done away with, just like lobbying nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush's Marc Rich pardon
There had better be a media pile on like there was in 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheEuclideanOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
24. Not Likely - Remember Scooter Libby's commutation?
All the same people that piled on with the Marc Rich pardon suddenly had an endless supply of excuses as to why it was okay to Communute Libby. The good thing about it is that it highlights the hypocracy of the Repbulican party so nicely. There has not been a single thing that the Republican's took a "principled" stance against when Clinton did it that they didn't excuse when Bush did it. If Bush got a blowjob in the Whitehouse, the Republican party, in perfect coordination would be arguing that it helped to keep the country safe so it was okay. They might even support retroactively changing the rules to permit it. It would be retroactive only until first day following the end of Clinton's term though. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shardik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. $28,500.00 ? Wow, it's cheaper to make a bribe than to hire an attorney. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Might have been the down payment.

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. "this is somebody who was alleged" ...
The guy plead guilty in 2003!!!

The victims' federal suit charged the Toussies lured "inexperienced and low income inner city minority first-time buyers into purchasing homes that they could not afford." The homes were overpriced by up to 50% and often defective, and the cost of mortgage payments was hidden, the suit said.

"The Toussies also fraudulently advertised sponsorship by the NAACP, alleged praise from black celebrities such as Maya Angelou, Whoopi Goldberg and former Mayor David Dinkins...none of whom made any such endorsements," the suit alleges. Toussie's lawyers denied the allegations and said "many plaintiffs were complicit" in the fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. He ought to be pardoning those Border Patrol agents - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. No shit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
13. And the guy's now working as a real estate consultant??? Yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidthegnome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Not surprising
If it worked once, it should work again. All he has to do is find people (the vast majority of Americans) who are unaware of his twisted scheming. Get out of jail free card... how nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 02:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. Color me shocked
or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
16. Aren't you supposed to repent to get a pardon? His lawyer is claiming he is innocent.
Edited on Wed Dec-24-08 03:28 AM by McCamy Taylor
That is not repentance. He is buying a pardon and then will go around bragging that he was innocent. So Bush is saying in effect "I don't like the job my own DOJ did. That guy was innocent."

If he is innocent, he is supposed to appeal--or get a pardon from the next administration saying the last one railroaded me. This is like what Scooter Libby got---a phony prosecution by the Bush DOJ that did not really want to protect consumers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 03:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. I hate the shock factor in these stories...
...why are we ever surprised? And is there really some legitimate legal/constitutional arguments for abolishing the pardon power? Perhaps a slight curtailment would be in order. I for one certainly don't think we should get rid of his clemency/commute power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
18. True to form
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
19. '..."To pardon Isaac Toussie is a kick in the teeth
to homeowners struggling with mortgages they can't afford."...'

Of course it is! That is exactly why he got a * pardon. Isn't that what rethugs are all about? * gives the finger to all struggling under his monumental f#ck-ups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
22. Bush damn well BETTER pardon Michael Milken now!
Milken got busted on technical violations largely so Rudy Giuliani could hang the biggest scalp of them all from his belt. Isaac Toussie got busted on genuine Financial Fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
23. Just about everyone on the planet has been kicked in the teeth by the boy monkey.
Welcome to the club.

"To pardon Isaac Toussie is a kick in the teeth to homeowners struggling with mortgages they can't afford."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
25. He scammed the poor; he deserves a GOP medal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
26. "No high-profile lawbreakers were on the list."
"Charles Winters, a Miami businessman considered a hero in Israel, was listed in a batch of 19 pardons and one commutation that Bush issued before leaving for Camp David to spend the holidays. No high-profile lawbreakers were on the list."


http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-politics-whitehouse/20081223/Bush.Pardons/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Ah, the American M$M: Licking the boots of tyrants since 1980 (and who knows how long before THAT)
:puke:

Just doing their job. Keeping the peasants calm, running interference and spraying squid ink into the waters for their Masters.

I am still amazed. I always thought, up until now, when I have seen it so many times with my own eyes there can be ZERO DOUBT, that State Criminals would have to use Nazi-level violence and intimidation (and threats to family members, women and children, etc.) to get this level of complicity.

Was I EVER WRONG!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smiley Donating Member (602 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. No you were not wrong!
As we all know the media is a waste of time as far as telling us the truth about anything. The powers that be enjoy spoon feeding us with only what they feel we should know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:57 AM
Response to Original message
27. That one hell of a return on a $28,500 investment!
Priceless...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
30. How perfectly Republicon
ptoooey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
31. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
32. Tip of the iceberg, I bet. Just wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
37. There he goes again ...protecting America from terrorists. Freaking ASSCARROT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
40. I wish everyone could read the story in the Daily News(first post).Bush's true legacy..
Edited on Wed Dec-24-08 01:08 PM by Stuart G
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I am not sure I read this correctly...the asshole unpardoned the pardon..
Edited on Wed Dec-24-08 06:08 PM by Stuart G
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/24/bush-revokes-pardon-of-sc_n_153399.html

I actually do not believe this..but he does things people don't believe..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Yep, it's true. I just posted about it over in General Discussion.
Crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
43. PARDON WAS REVERSED TODAY!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-24-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Really? Last I recall reading on CNN was that it was just being looked into because it hasnt been 5
years since the guy got out of prison and the guidelines I guess are that the person has to have been out of prison for 5 years before they will consider passing it on to the president, which brings up a question.
If a persons on death row or serving life then how can they ask for a pardon even from the president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
48. The Constitution says nothing about reversing a pardon. Bush has broken the law, again!
The power to pardon is absolute! The Constitution does not give a President the power to reverse or annul a pardon, and rightly so, for a future President may come in and reverse a pardon given by one of his predecessors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-25-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. Another do-over bush can't do?
"asked if he still would have gone to war if he knew that Iraq did not possess those weapons "That is a do-over that I can't do.'' "

from here:

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/12/bush_iraq_war_a_doover_i_cant.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC