Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Archbishop Desmond) Tutu Urges Obama to Apologize to Iraqis

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 10:46 AM
Original message
(Archbishop Desmond) Tutu Urges Obama to Apologize to Iraqis
Source: NY Times

Archbishop Desmond Tutu warned Thursday that President Obama risked squandering good will from around the world if he failed to take concrete steps like apologizing for the Iraq war. Archbishop Tutu, 77, a Nobel Peace Prize laureate and the retired archbishop of Cape Town, also urged Mr. Obama to support the International Criminal Court and “come down hard” on African dictators. He wrote in an article for the BBC’s Web site that the high hopes surrounding Mr. Obama’s presidency could turn sour. Mr. Obama “could easily squander the good will that his election generated if he disappoints,” Archbishop Tutu wrote. “It would be wonderful if, on behalf of the nation, Obama apologizes to the world, and especially the Iraqis, for an invasion that I believe has turned out to be an unmitigated disaster.”

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/20/world/africa/20briefs-TUTUURGESOBA_BRF.html?ref=world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama's not the one that
should be apologizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. As the President of the United States he should be apologizing on behalf of the country.
Bill Clinton apologized for slavery despite the fact that slavery ended nearly a century before he was even born, as President he was the spokesperson for the nation so he was the only person that could offer the apology on behalf of the nation.

I agree with you that there are other people who should be apologizing as well, and I would extend that further to say many of those people who should be apologizing should also be going to prison. In Obama's case however he does not bear any direct responsibility for going to war with Iraq so it would not be a personal apology coming from him, it would be an apology on behalf of our nation. I agree with Tutu, Obama should issue that apology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bif Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why should he apologize
Bush and his gang of thugs should be down on their knees, begging for mercy.
Even thought they don't think they made a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. maybe because he is President of the United States?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. This war went on for five years under the administration that started it. Where has
Archbishop Tutu been all that time?

Has he asked Pope Rat Zinger to apologize for his OWN participation in both Hitler Youth AND the massive Catholic church cover up of pedophile priests? No? Maybe the Archbiship should look to getting his own glass house in order before presuming to tell Obama what to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. As far as the Hitler Youth goes. No one should ever have to apologize for being the victim of Child-
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 11:42 AM by Wizard777
Abuse by a government. That's not the gotcha you might think it is. You should learn more about the Hitler youth before you embarrass yourself any farther.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Depending upon how old Ratzie was at the time, you may have a point, but making your point
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 12:57 PM by No Elephants
does not require an unprovoked personal jab. Or does it?

Of course, age was not an excuse for Ratzinger's participation in the pedophile priest cover up. And there still is the matter of Tutu suddenly concluding that Obama owes Iraq an apology when Tutu said nothing for five years about Bush apologizing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
27. That's part of the point. Never mind personal jabs. Children who were not in the Hitler Youth were -
beaten by those who were. Sometimes severely. This was more than encouraged by the Hitler Youth leaders. It was the children's duty. They didn't exactly have a legitimate "choice" in joining. If because of lineage you ranked in the right place on the chart established by the Nuremberg Laws that ultimately provided for the holocaust. You were in like it or not.

How ever I don't disagree with you on the other point. Since he exercised diplomatic immunity to avoid having to appear in court. He should be refused entrance to the USA as provided for in Diplomatic law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. How 'bout America apologizes by the public trials of the bUsh Cartel?
Only (some) Americans don't know the crimes committed by George W. bUsh & co.

Let's make it all public to all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. that would be a really good idea....
it took the chileans and argentinians years to ferret out their criminals and cambodia`s trials are just beginning.it may not happen for several years but i`m hoping that i may live long enough to see the trials begin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. I think that's wise. We should first determine exactly what we should be apologizing for.
Anything else would be an insincere and empty lip service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. I'd really like to know how the rest of the world would feel about that...
I mean, it's got to be obvious to Obama that most Dems would like to see justice done. But apparently, because he feels it would be misconstrued as an act of revenge, he doesn't want to pursue it.

Maybe if he realized that the rest of the world wants the Bush Cartel held accountable, Obama might change his mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
5. i think he should....
there is no reason why we should`t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. he should apologize in behalf of the US
it would go a long way to healing relations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. And by "he," do you mean Bush or Obama? And what makes you think an apology is going to go a long
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 01:05 PM by No Elephants
way toward healing relations (a) while we are still occupiers? or (b) ever? If someone killed my husband and/or children and destroyed my home, an apology from his nation's leader is only going to make me spit.

I doubt anyone thought about an apology from Obama for the invasion of Iraq. The suggestion puts Obama in an impossible position. Again, given Tutu's silence on the subject for five years under Bush, I really question his motives bringing it up now.

Not to mention...who gave Tutu authority over U.S. foreign policy? Was that part of his ordination or something? Did he major in apologies by heads of state at seminary?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. this isn't about blaming Obama...
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 01:11 PM by fascisthunter
it's about an American leader reaching out and apologizing on behalf of a nation, a nation which invaded Iraq under false pretenses and still occupies to this day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. You think apologizing during an occupation is a great idea? Do you think
Tutu's calling for that is a great idea? Something about this sudden "inspiration" on the part of Tutu stinks to high heaven, no pun intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. yes I do Thinks it's a Wonderful Idea
and I think you are too biased to ever agree with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I see. Someone who holds my opinion is too biased and someone who holds your opinion is
objective. Riiiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. you replied to me, and I answered your snarky question
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 03:51 PM by fascisthunter
... as politely as possible. If you don't like it, feel free to place me on ignore, because your chiding isn't going to work. If anything good comes from this will be the fact that this article gets a kick each and everytime we post.

You are extremely defensive over the implication that Obama is somehow being blamed. I don't see it... but when your that far up someone's ass, you just can't see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No your other reply was not polite and this one is worse. I am not at all defensive about
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 04:02 PM by No Elephants
Obama. That is something you made up from whole cloth. I have criticized Obama all over this board, and argued with his less critical devotees. This has nothing to do with Obama, in my view. It is a statement that Tutu made. I see it as Tutu overstepping and being disingenuous on several counts.

And frankly, I think apologizing for invading and occupying a country while you continue to occupy is one of the dumbest ideas there is. However, I can recognize that as my view without attacking you personally. Apparently, you can't. Pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. Considering we illegally invaded their country on lies and slaughtered hundreds of thousands...
...of innocent people, YES, I do think it's a good idea.

It's literally the very least we can do as a nation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's a darn good first step....
Edited on Fri Feb-20-09 02:57 PM by chknltl
...along a long, long road.

I agree with Archbishop Tutu.

If your kid broke a neighbor's window wouldn't you want him to first apologize for breaking it before fixing it?

What if you and your kid occupied that neighbors house when he broke that window, would you think it better to ignore the broken window or better to apologize for it getting broken by the kid?

Didn't Colin Powell say something along the lines of "You break it you own it."?

Well in this country, governed by a representative government, We The People broke that country Iraq. It is true that we occupy this country we broke but our occupation does not negate the fact that we broke it. Apologies are in order, as are repairs! The world is watching, we will be judged by our actions and our relationship with that world depends on our actions.

If one wishes, one could look at it from this selfish viewpoint: Our choice to ignore the fact that our country broke Iraq could lead easily to further acts of terrorism against our citizenry. Would you truly blame a citizen of Iraq who lost his home, his job and his family due to our supposed 'war against terrorism', for seeking new employment with Al-Quida? Would you blame him if he strapped on a small nuke (provided him by his new employers) and detonated it in your local mall? "Don't let the smoking gun be a mushroom cloud...." (again, a selfish way to look at this matter!)

The apology is important, quite necessary imo., but it is only the first step. A thousand shoes to our own heads if we chose to ignore this step and the many others our nation should take to fix what we broke.

(edited for a punctuation repair)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. This is not like apologizing before you fix the window. It's like apologizing as you continue
breakiing the windows. It's like my standing on your foot and apologizing while I continue to stand on your foot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Is your problem with the apology one of timing?
What if you and your neighbors were standing there watching as your kid kept breaking their windows? What harm is there in apologizing to them for your kid's rampage just prior to your stopping the kid? Do you think that there is a better point to offer up an apology? I suppose I could understand that doing both at the same time might make some sense...


(I'll be back later to continue this discussion if you like, sorry to post and run but I've got to get back to work now-c)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Let's take the kids out of this. Imagine that I have been bouncing up and down on your
gut, HARD, as though you were a human trampoline, for five years. Further imagine that I have someone been able to simultaneously do the same to your spouse, kids, grandkids, neighbors, etc. And, somehow, as a result of my bouncing on all your guts, many around you have died and are continuing to die, many have become homeless, over a million have become refugees, selling their children into slavery and other horrors. While continuing to use all of you as human trampolines, I am saying, "I'm really sorry about bouncing up and down on all your guts." Yet, I have not stopped bouncing up and down for a second.

What would you think of me, my sincerity and my apology?


That hypothetical is just for openers. What happens after I apologize? What kind of position have I put the U.S in? In what kind of position does apologizing--which acknowledges wrongdoing--put Bushco and my own administration? Criminally? Financially? Internationally, with nations other than Iraq? Etc. It is not a simple thing.

As I said, I think, just by raising it, Tutu has put Obama in an impossible position, and only weeks into his Presidency. (This is not personal to Obama. It's about the President. It would not matter if the current President were Mickey Mouse or that other, dumber, less appealing rodent.)

Beyond that, I just think Tutu is way out of line on this. It really is not his place. And more than a little hubris. And, if he feels comfortable pronouncing on how leaders should ehave, he might look around a lot closer to home first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 12:57 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. I'm not sure you answered my question...I'll try again:
Sorry I can be a bit slow at understanding what folks sometimes are trying to say in these discussions, so I'll ask again:

Is your issue with an apology from the American Government to Iraq one of timing? (ie: Do you think it should come after we stop the crimes we are doing/have done to Iraq or do you think it should come while we are stopping those crimes?-I gather, from reading your replies, that you are against the apology happening prior to our doing anything about those crimes.) I am asking this because I am not sure where you stand on the apology, if it's a timing issue, a Desmond Tutu issue or even if you think an apology is needed at all.

Now that I've a little more time to reflect on things, I'd like to respond to your next post with my feelings and thoughts on this topic.

"........While continuing to use all of you as human trampolines, I am saying, "I'm really sorry about bouncing up and down on all your guts." Yet, I have not stopped bouncing up and down for a second. What would you think of me, my sincerity and my apology?" Well of course I would doubt the sincerity of the apology under those circumstances. Under those circumstances, the cessation on your part of the jumping up and down on our guts business would need to be concurrent with the apology for me to even start to believe in it's sincerity.

"What happens after I apologize?"
(I'll interpret this to mean "What happens after President Obama apologizes?") Well that depends on our President and his Administration of course. IMO the next step after the apology should be a statement by the President that we will be rapidly shifting gears and focusing our efforts on repair. There is much to repair in Iraq on many levels, a triage list is in order here. I would suggest humanitarian aid should be quite high on this list with seeing to the urgent needs of the millions of expatriated refugees topping it. Getting Iraq's hospitals, electric, water and sewers back online and the rebuilding of all Iraqi infrastructure using American funding and Iraqi labor would also go high on this list.

Eventually someone needs to clean up the depleted uranium oxide contaminants that spoil Iraqi lands. That is a HUGE one on my list of the horrors that needs addressing in Iraq. Also, if we truly expect a democracy in Iraq, (not that this is any of our concern imo, it is NOT our country to do with as we please), a rebuilding of the Iraqi middle class needs to happen.

"In what kind of position does apologizing--which acknowledges wrongdoing--put Bushco and my own administration?" Again this depends on what comes next. An apology and a continence of any crimes that we may be yet committing will do us little good. OTOH if after that apology we undertake steps to repair what we broke like I suggested earlier, that would put President Obama in the position of being a great humanitarian! I think having someone like that as our POTUS would be something we as a nation, could take a whole lot of pride in! I think that we would find a great many nations coming to our aid in that repair of Iraq as well because of the noble and selfless actions of our President. I agree that an apology is an admission of wrongdoing. We did indeed commit some ferocious wrongdoings and an admission of this is a good first step.

"Hello my name is America and I am addicted to...." (OK somewhat off topic)
Kicking an addiction requires that the addict first admit that there is indeed an addiction!!! As a nation this apology could be a first step to resolving an ongoing problem-a problem all but invisible to our fellow countrymen but not so invisible to most folks everywhere else, (and especially visible to our victims). We did a great many wrongs to the Native Americans, we did wrong by the Japanese Americans, we did a horrible wrongness to the peoples of both South and North Vietnam and as you point out we've done a nightmarish wrong to the citizens of Iraq! Ignoring this only allows the 'addiction' to continue. That addiction of course is one derived from greed and fear and arrogance. It's time we stopped being the bully nation, it's time to admit that we have made some terrible mistakes in the past and that we as a nation have learned from these mistakes. It's time we let the world know that We The People shall not let the horrors of another Iraq or another Vietnam happen again.

As to the position an apology would put this and the prior Administrations in: This would show the world that the Obama Administration sees the Bush Administration exactly as how most of the civilized world sees the Bush Administration: as a gang of International war-criminals who chose to ignore select sections of the Geneva Conventions while perpetrating a war against the citizens of Iraq in order to enrich further their close corporate chums. If President Obama should issue this apology, it will take some of the responsibility for the crimes committed by the Bush Administration off of the shoulders of We The People and place that responsibility on the shoulders of the crooks!

Do you like sharing in the crimes committed by the Bush Administration? I doubt you do and nor should We The People be held fully accountable either. Many of our fellow members of the electorate were duped by the bush crime family's propaganda program. There was a whole lot less of us believing those lies in this last election which is why in part that things worked out as they did. When We The People choose to ignore the crimes committed by OUR President, I believe that We The People become complicit in the eyes of our President's victims as well as in the eyes of much of the world.

Do you recall what happened to the citizens of the towns near the death camps in Post WWII Germany? Should We The People share such a fate because of the bush crime families crimes? Another-words who would you rather the Iraqi victims be angry with, the American citizens or the bush crime family? This apology followed up by a rapid repositioning of our efforts in Iraq will go a looooong way imo to soothing Iraqi and world animosity currently aimed our direction.

Furthermore it lays the grounds for a much needed Congressional investigation into those wrongdoings. Most of the citizens of our nation would be spellbound by the daily news of such investigations in the same way that we were once, as a nation, captivated by the OJ Simpson trial. Many of us on the left would cheer on the investigations knowing that Bush and his gang are guilty. OTOH, many on the right would see this as a chance to prove that we on the left were wrong! The facts could be laid bare for all to see! As our democracy requires an informed electorate, this then would be the information crucial to our future democratic process and equally crucial to the prevention of another near hostile takeover of our government. The end-product of the investigation would go a long way to healing and reuniting our nation, regardless of how the investigation turned out. (Most of our fellow Americans now think that OJ was indeed a murderer regardless of him being found not-guilty!)

"Beyond that, I just think Tutu is way out of line on this. It really is not his place." Well that's gonna have to be in the 'agree to disagree' category for us. IMO any citizen of this planet is equally qualified to ask President Obama to do what Archbishop Tutu asked. It matters not to me if the request comes from Osama Bin Laden or from a little old lady in Osh Kosh-if the Emperor is parading down the street in his birthday suit I don't think it should matter who is first to bring it to his attention.

I can see where one could argue that position or status is important and Archbishop Tutu's position is one which commands more attention than a homeless vet wandering the streets of Albuquerque. This to me means that the Archbishop's message will get out to more folks than that homeless vet's message would. I would have to agree with you if you called me biased because I am in favor of the message. Had I disagreed with the message I might have thought otherwise so I'll even own up to maybe being a hypocrite in this case. The message, imo, is an important one-one that needed to get out and I am glad it came from one of his stature in the world. I hope more folks follow his lead.


It appears that you and I are equally appalled at what has gone down in Iraq, which of course is a good thing to be in agreement with, but we are not in agreement on how to do something about it. I feel that an apology and then a rapid shift to a repair of the damages we did is a sensible course, one which will bear us much fruit in both the short and long runs. I suspect that you would like to see some sort of accountability accorded the crooks who perpetrated these crimes too but I am still not sure if your issue with the apology is one of timing or if you even feel any apology is warranted at all.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. Obama voted against this mess..
he owes no apology to anyone.

But Bush Co on trial and make those fuckers apologize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. He was not in the U.S. Senate when the Iraqi War Resolution was taken, so he
did not vote against it. He did make a very public speech against it at the time. People argue that was not the same as being in the Senate and voting against it. However, he was considering/intending a U.S. Senate run when he made the speech, so it was not a risk free move.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burrowowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-20-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
29. Obama should apologize for the Nation!
And should pursue Bu$hCo criminals, Remember Nuremberg!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-21-09 03:48 AM
Response to Original message
31. it's not going to happen
for better or for worse-usually worse-the US doesn't apologize for its actions on the world stage


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC