Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Merrill Says It Discovered Trading "Irregularity" (Update2)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jordi_fanclub Donating Member (388 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:45 AM
Original message
Merrill Says It Discovered Trading "Irregularity" (Update2)
Source: Bloomberg

March 6 (Bloomberg) -- Merrill Lynch & Co., the securities firm acquired by Bank of America Corp., said it uncovered an “irregularity” during a review of its trading operations.

The bank informed regulators immediately of the discrepancy in “certain trading positions”, Merrill Lynch said in a statement from London today. The bank said it’s working with the authorities to investigate further. A spokeswoman for the bank declined to comment further.

Merrill Lynch may have lost hundreds of millions of dollars on currency trading and credit derivatives last year, the New York Times reported earlier today. The losses did not “spill into plain view” until after Bank of America investors had approved the $33 billion takeover in December and Merrill Lynch disbursed $3.6 billion in bonuses to bankers, the newspaper said. Bank of America later sought additional government funding.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=awR18y2Q7QLU&refer=home



The extensions of Wall St FRAUDSTERS are still alive but not so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now how do you lose hundreds of millions and not know about it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Ask Rumsfeld about the2.3Trillion in 2003.
:shrug:

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
D-Lee Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Think about a go-go era disco man in the 1960s as a typical banker
Edited on Fri Mar-06-09 02:53 PM by D-Lee
(maybe with some nose candy) ... get rid of the thought of a grey-haired, grey-suited responsible tightfisted banker.

You need to re-conceptualize to understand what has happened because of "bank" de-regulation.

That thought pattern helps me a lot!

If that image doesn't do it for you, think about someone with a really big gambling addiction.

After all, a banker who approved a $500,000 mortgage for someone making $40,000 per year definitely is not operating on old-style banking principles ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. I uncovered an irregularity, too. It's beginning to look as though I robbed a bank. No problem!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I'm getting the feeling the banks
are robbing us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Merrill has been convicted three or four times for trading irregularities

It is no surprise that their whole system is set up to hide the results of traders acting badly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. sure ,whatever--then begs more money to loot and pay huge bonuses
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can someone explain in plain English what this means?
Are they saying euphemistically that they may have broken the law or something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Looks Like it Was an Individual Trader
who lost a large amount of money and tried to cover his tracks rather than 'fess up.
Three weeks ago, risk officers discovered that a London currency trader who had recorded a trading profit of $120 million for the fourth quarter may instead have lost a large amount, the New York Times said, citing an unidentified Bank of America executive.

The newspaper identified the employee as Alexis Stenfors, 38. He told the New York Times the matter was a “misunderstanding” and is co-operating with the probe.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Oh, thanks.
It's hard for someone like me who isn't in finance to grasp, in view of all the current financial scandals, numbers of dollars being thrown around in the billions and trillions, ... to grasp why this is making news or what the significance of this is. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Glad You Asked
The part of the article that was posted didn't really say anything. I figured someone was mokeying with bid and ask prices or something.

It's not the first time this has happenned and it may not have been Merrill's fault. Just an overaggressive trader who lied to keep his job.

I work in finance in the telecom industry and I have difficulty interpreting a lot of the news these days. The banking industry is very specialized. Can't imagine what it's like for most people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I can only guess that Merrill didn't take enough Imodium-AD and down the money went.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kojak Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. Only hundreds of millions? *yawn*
This guy needs to be fired as he's just a rank amateur. His pals are probably laughing at him right now as they're busy hiding billions in a Lichtenstein bank account.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Confiscate ALL Assets from those who committed Fraud
and then throw their over-priviledged ego-centris fascist asses in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
13. Irregularities and discrepancies huh?
Well, how about we just write you a big fat check. Does that help fix these Irregularities and discrepancies?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. Something smells really fishy on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-06-09 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. More London skullduggery
"The newspaper identified the employee as Alexis Stenfors, 38. He told the New York Times the matter was a “misunderstanding” and is co-operating with the probe. He remains a Merrill Lynch employee. Calls to his office in London and mobile phone from Bloomberg News weren’t answered."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC