Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC Producers Asked Not To Highlight Cramer/Stewart

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:20 PM
Original message
MSNBC Producers Asked Not To Highlight Cramer/Stewart
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 07:20 PM by kpete
Source: MediaBistro

Friday, Mar 13
MSNBC Producers Asked Not To Highlight Cramer/Stewart

A TVNewser tipster tells us MSNBC producers were asked not to incorporate the Jim Cramer/Jon Stewart interview into their shows today. In fact, the only time it came up on MSNBC was during the White House briefing, when a member of the press corps asked Press Secretary Robert Gibbs if Pres. Obama watched. Gibbs wasn't sure if the president had, but Gibbs did. "I enjoyed it thoroughly," the Press Secretary said.

On Cramer's network, CNBC, the subject has only come up twice today, including when master marketer/CNBC personality Donny Deutsch brought it up briefly around 1pm on "Power Lunch." "I'm a huge Jon Stewart fan," said Deutsch, "He does what he does he does his job. But I'm also a huge Jim Cramer fan. He sticks up for the little guy, he cares, he puts his neck out, and I respect that. I respect both those guys."

Cramer appeared on his regular "Stop Trading" segment during "Street Signs." But the Daily Show did not come up. With anchor Erin Burnett in Washington, the discussion was about banking policy and the Federal Reserve, ending with Cramer saying, "Ben Bernanke's got the magic." (A far cry from Cramer's "Wake-Up" call to Bernanke in August '07.)

Insiders tell TVNewser Cramer will talk about Stewart tonight on "Mad Money" (6pmET & 11pmET).



Read more: http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/nbc/msnbc_producers_asked_not_to_highlight_cramerstewart_111307.asp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. KO hasn't mentioned it yet. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. He would be dissing his employer, but, I don't think that would really stop him.
I could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. C'mon Keith! Rachel? Anybody?
Can't risk the job in a bad economy? Wish someone would take some names and kick some butt? Well HERE'S a thought...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Rachel did reference it ...last night....in an amusing way.
It was more like "That thing we can't mention".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, it would stop him. KO is a team player. If GE does it, it's ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moundsview Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Where else is he going to make 4 million a year?
Those jobs don't grow on trees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. KO doesn't have to say anything
The whole thing speaks for itself. Its better if Keith just lets this boil over on another burner. If he jumps on the wagon then he becomes just another 'liberal media' anti-capitalist going for the easy kill, or so the FAUX news gang will portray it. Its much better to spread it around. Also why poke the NBC peacock when he doesn't have to? He can focus on stories that are not being told. I don't want the corporate execs to have any more ammunition to cancel his show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Other than the occasional giggle or snide comment about Pat Buchanan
I've never seen KO or Rachel go after any of NBC's own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Olbermann: Rick Santelli (CNBC) Worse Person in the World:
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 09:38 PM by Garbo 2004
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. To all replies: I did say, I could be wrong.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's still getting plenty of air time on other networks
I saw plenty of coverage of it on CNN and ABC today. If NBC doesn't want to diss themselves, I can live with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's not so much Cramer got his ass handed to him
as much as it is the massive fraud and theft and theivery that is being uncovered by Jon Stewart calling out the dirty trickters and shining a light on the deception that is being perpetrated on America and Americans by the hucksters and snakeoil salesmen. For every Madoff that gets uncovered, there are 500 more that are still running their own Ponzi scheme abetted by the shills on M$M and their paid lackeys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUlover2909 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rachel is talking about it now.
8:28 pm CST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. The same shit must be happening on FBC and all
of these other "Your money" shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. It makes sense. I'm good at smelling BS and the vast majority of those "investment" shows are BS. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. fuckin p@wnd..
Edited on Fri Mar-13-09 09:43 PM by frylock
eat it, you turd buckets. i'm lookin at you, joey scabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
17. If Wall Street and the banksters won the argument, clips would have been played so much
all over each and every cable/network news station that we would be sick of it.

Since the average joe's viewpoint won, the media is silent.

Kinda proves Jon's argument doesn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-13-09 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. Here are some comments from Keith Olbermann on this...
The assumption that we would automatically do a story on a story Jon Stewart did is not a good one.

There is no interaction between his show and mine, and while it's possible that we did some significant segments on any of his previous smackdowns or vivisections (as good as they might have been), I don't remember when that would've been. So it's either not happened, or it hasn't happened in a long time.

Also the premise of corporate no-touch orders to keep what happened "quiet" is silly. That horse (in fact, an entire stable-full) left that barn as soon as the video hit the internet. My understanding is Rachel's doing a little something on this.

There is also - and of course I know this from being on the other end - the element of competitive gamesmanship about this. If there had been anybody of Cramer's heft on Fox Business, subjected to Stewart's hammering, I don't know that ABC, CBS and Fox would've been quite so interested in covering it. Conversely, I recall Stewart doing a lot of hammering of Foxies and it's not like I've turned all of those into 10-minute segments on this show.


and this:



I've been at the Mets game all day (65+ / 0-)

So I'm reading the TVNewser post for the first time.

Frankly, the guy who posted this, the site's Associate Editor, Steve Krakauer ("SteveK"), is well known around the industry as being entirely in Fox's pocket.

His "MSNBC producers have been told" not to mention this, is, frankly, bullshit.

Have a look at his posts on this otherwise successfully neutral site: they are Fox News and Fox Business Channel press release rewrites, and anonymous criticisms from "industry sources" of people at CNN and MSNBC.

The Fox Business stuff is particularly egregious and particularly relevant to this. If a newspaper with a circulation of 500 people runs a feature on somebody on that channel, SteveK summarizes it, posts a picture from it, posts a link to it. I mean, seriously, if there's been any publicity for this channel that has yet to get a measurable audience after a year on the air (that means they're under 15,000 viewers), that hasn't gotten a link on TVNewser courtesy SteveK, it'd be a shocking upset.

Rachel could get the cover of Newsweek and he wouldn't link to it.

So, did Stewart do a good job? Obviously. Did we get ordered not to run it? Nope. Was stirring up rumors about a ban in the interest of a Foxophilic blogger with the credibility of a bush league Drudge? You bet.

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2009/3/13/182441/605/333#c333

It seems he posts at Dkos sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rolltideroll Donating Member (410 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
32. Thanks
That puts it rest for me, good job on the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. MSNBC Producers Asked Not to Highlight Cramer/Stewart
Source: Media Bistro

A TVNewser tipster tells us MSNBC producers were asked not to incorporate the Jim Cramer/Jon Stewart interview into their shows today. In fact, the only time it came up on MSNBC was during the White House briefing, when a member of the press corps asked Press Secretary Robert Gibbs if Pres. Obama watched. Gibbs wasn't sure if the president had, but Gibbs did. "I enjoyed it thoroughly," the Press Secretary said.

JCramer_3.13.bmpOn Cramer's network, CNBC, the subject has only come up twice today, including when master marketer/CNBC personality Donny Deutsch brought it up briefly around 1pm on "Power Lunch." "I'm a huge Jon Stewart fan," said Deutsch, "He does what he does he does his job. But I'm also a huge Jim Cramer fan. He sticks up for the little guy, he cares, he puts his neck out, and I respect that. I respect both those guys."

Cramer appeared on his regular "Stop Trading" segment during "Street Signs." But the Daily Show did not come up. With anchor Erin Burnett in Washington, the discussion was about banking policy and the Federal Reserve, ending with Cramer saying, "Ben Bernanke's got the magic." (A far cry from Cramer's "Wake-Up" call to Bernanke in August '07.)

Insiders tell TVNewser Cramer will talk about Stewart tonight on "Mad Money" (6pmET & 11pmET).



Read more: http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/nbc/msnbc_producers_asked_not_to_highlight_cramerstewart_111307.asp



A friend, who is a vice president at a PR firm sent this to me. He said that
this is an insider site for those who work in PR and the media.

Thought everyone here might be interested in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. yes, we've all been discussing this for hours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanboggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Excellent
I guess they figured out who won that match, too. :evilgrin: Thanks for this tidbit of info which made me smile - again :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. Well, it's not the New York Times...
...but sometimes it's intriguing to read what
the insiders are saying in publications that
most of us might not stumble upon.

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Rachel mentioned it on her show briefly
and she said that Cramer got grilled by Stewart. She also showed the clip about Gibbs talking about it.

Keith said nothing about it but I don't recall him having anyone from CNBC on his show to talk about economics. He usually has Paul Krugman and some other economic experts on to discuss those issues. Wonder if Keith thinks Cramer is an idiot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasquatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. To the front page with this news
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #23
27. It won't get on the front page, that was Jon's point

The news doesn't show what the public needs to know. It only shows those things which are favorable to Wall Streeters and Chamber of Commerce types.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
26. After watching Schuster and Keith, I had a feeling this was the case.
Rachel, however, mentioned it ;)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
28. San Francisco broadcast stations aired it
I saw a lengthy piece saying everyone's talking about it; it featured the "so's cocaine and hookers" video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. That light you see in the distance is the sun setting on Cramer's financial advisor career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. The Corporate Mafia doesn't like being embarrassed and outed.
Edited on Sat Mar-14-09 03:00 AM by TheWatcher
Especially not on Comedy Central.

Anyone still doubt that the Media is Bought and Paid for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Exactly. MSNBC has now left no doubt who won the showdown. Bravo, Jon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ryanmuegge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-14-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
33. Big surprise. All of these "serious" media idiots are slime.
They're all a bunch of gossip mongers who are just as reprehensible as the politicians that they cover.

It's good that Jon Stewart and Colbert are willing to call out the CNBC a-holes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC