Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coleman all but concedes, but will appeal court ruling

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Mister Ed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:55 PM
Original message
Coleman all but concedes, but will appeal court ruling
Edited on Tue Mar-31-09 07:03 PM by Mister Ed
Source: Minneapolis Star-Tribune

Coleman legal spokesman Ben Ginsberg all but conceded that the Republican lost the seven-week trial and was prepared to appeal to the Minnesota Supreme Court.

"It is pretty much of a longshot with that few ballots being put in play," Ginsberg said, comparing the Republican's odds of winning the trial to someone betting on the winning team in the NCAA basketball tournament. "We are disappointed. But we feel the court is wrong and we will appeal."

Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., made the following statement today: "Sen. Reid is looking forward to the final resolution of this case by the Minnesota courts so that Al Franken can finally be seated as the new senator from Minnesota."

Read more: http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/senate/42221767.html?page=1&c=y



Harry Reid's spokesman seems to be promising that the Senate will seat Franken if the Repubs try to drag this into federal courts after Minnesota courts have made their rulings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. But we feel the court is wrong and we will appeal.
Fuck you Norm & Company
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. somebody has probably already brought this up...
but does anybody remember when the very thought of Gore demanding a recount was a threat to the foundations of American Democracy, and probably Western Civilization Since The Greeks?

Because... Deadlines! OMFG, there were deadlines!

Now, we've got the GOP pounding its shoe and saying they'll cheerfully appeal this thing all the way to the supreme court, even if it takes the next 20 years.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. actually, I believe that was Coleman's argument ...
before Franken started pulling ahead, instead of conceding the contest before the votes were counted ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Coleman's intitial position was that Al should waive his right to a recount to save money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. We remember with breathtaking clarity.
AND LET THIS BE A LESSON TO DEMOCRATS IN THE FUTURE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Deadlines were for electoral votes. No equivalent to that in Senatorial elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. You know
Nothing says the Minnesota Supreme Court will even take the case...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. He will probably sue for psychological damages now.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. OK, in Minnesota, Supreme Court review is discretionary -- the Supreme Court
gets to pick and choose which cases it will hear. Here are the criteria:

Subd. 2. Discretionary Review. Review of any decision of the Court of Appeals is discretionary with the Supreme Court. The following criteria may be considered:

(a) the question presented is an important one upon which the Supreme Court should rule; or
(b) the Court of Appeals has ruled on the constitutionality of a statute; or
(c) the lower courts have so far departed from the accepted and usual course of justice as to call for an exercise of the Supreme Court's supervisory powers; or
(d) a decision by the Supreme Court will help develop, clarify, or harmonize the law; and

(1) the case calls for the application of a new principle or policy; or
(2) the resolution of the question presented has possible statewide impact; or
(3) the question is likely to recur unless resolved by the Supreme Court.

http://www.courts.state.mn.us/?page=511#civil

We shall see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Here they go with appeals- MN Supreme Ct then SCOTUS. Another 5-4 or 6-3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kay1864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. My guess is that SCOTUS will refuse to hear the case
This ruling affects only Minnesota, not the US. (yeah, it's the "US" Senate, but it's still a state election, not a national one)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Seems to be promising, that's Harry.
Please prove me wrong Reid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Exactly. Nothing will happen.
Well, I hope it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. i hope Coleman ends up in prison, fucking loser
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-31-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. pony-up those legal fees
tool-boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. Democrats in short supply on the SCOTUS and even scarcer on the MN Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
17. YOu know the GOP will do anything to retain Minnesota...
Wellstone....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC