Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US replaces Blackwater for some Iraq security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:04 PM
Original message
US replaces Blackwater for some Iraq security
Source: AP

WASHINGTON – The State Department said Wednesday it has signed the Virginia-based private security firm Triple Canopy to take over protecting U.S. diplomats on the ground in Iraq from Blackwater Worldwide, now known as Xe.

Blackwater, which earlier this year changed its name to Xe (pronounced "Zee"), had come under heavy criticism for its alleged role in a fatal gun battle in Iraq. The Iraqi government refused to renew the firm's license to operate in the country.

State Department spokesman Gordon Duguid said the government gave the job to Triple Canopy on Tuesday following a decision made in January not to renew Blackwater's contract.

"The department awarded Triple Canopy the ground task order for protective security details in Baghdad after a thorough evaluation of proposals from each company that had submitted bids," Duguid told reporters.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090401/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_blackwater_iraq_1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess our troops aren't good enough? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bids? BIDS? "B I D S???"
Whatdahell is a bid?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't they get it?
It's not the particular company that's the problem. It's the CONCEPT of using MERCENARIES for something that government employees should be doing. If the Army or Marines can't provide security for whatever political reason, why not the Secret Service?

Doesn't anybody in the administration watch "24"? For all its problems with believability and poor character development (what's with the president being perpetually perplexed?), the show does make a good point: DON'T SUPPORT MERCENARY ARMIES.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Actually the State Department had their own protective force
Edited on Wed Apr-01-09 05:02 PM by RamboLiberal
I remember seeing a number of years ago a program about them and their training. Guess US Govt pretty much outsourced them when the jerks like Blackwater came along.

I agree - that's a good plotline to pay attention to this season in "24" - their Blackwater is named Starkwood and the meglomaniac founder is attacking the U.S. for his own political purposes.

And anyone remember Ravenwood in the excellent TV series Jericho?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-01-09 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. "And anyone remember Ravenwood in the excellent TV series Jericho?"
Yup. And see how quickly that show was taken off the air, even after its brief reprieve?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Michigan-Arizona Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Jericho
Hubby & I never missed an episode. We felt they took it off because it hit to close to home & we can't have that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Jericho was good
I caught all the episodes in a marathon last year. I'm sure it was taken down for political reasons, because it was pretty well-produced and well thought-out. That is, until the final episode or two when it seemed to have been re-written to effect a rather abrupt ending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-02-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Amy had a segment about this today with Scahill:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC