Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Legislators refuse Palin's demand for public vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
harpboy_ak Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 02:26 AM
Original message
Legislators refuse Palin's demand for public vote
Source: Anchorage Daily News

Legislators refuse Palin's demand for public vote

APPOINTEE: Dispute over picks may take the courts to resolve.

By SEAN COCKERHAM
scockerham@adn.com

Published: April 3rd, 2009 04:28 PM
Last Modified: April 3rd, 2009 10:48 PM

JUNEAU -- Alaska lawmakers have no intention of agreeing to Gov. Sarah Palin's demand for all senators to vote in public on her appointment of Tim Grussendorf to the state Senate. That's set up a showdown with no clear resolution, and talk of a potential court battle between the Legislature and the governor.

(snip)

Palin said Thursday she did not accept the decision by the state Senate Democrats to reject her appointment of Grussendorf to fill the seat that opened when Juneau Democratic Sen. Kim Elton resigned for an Obama administration job.

The governor, citing a 1987 legal opinion, said the decision wasn't valid because it happened behind closed doors and only among the Senate Democrats. She sent a letter to Stevens, a Kodiak Republican, asking for a public vote of the full Senate, which is composed of 10 Republicans and nine Democrats.

(snip)

Republican Senate President Stevens said he doesn't want to vote on the governor's appointee to a Democratic seat, out of fear that it would create a precedent that would come back to bite when a Republican seat needs to be filled.



Read more: http://www.adn.com/news/politics/story/747513.html



Palin appointed this DINO, instead of accepting the nomination of House Minority Leader Beth Kerttula by the Juneau Democratic District Committee. Grussendorf was registered Republican until it was rumored that Elton was being vetted for job in the Obama Dept. of the Interior. He's the pet candidate of Alaska Federation of Republican Women chair Paulette Simpson, the woman that introduced Bill Kristol to the Governess, setting her on the road to the VP nomination. His opinions on many issues agrees with the Governess, but they conflict with the opinions of a majority of Juneau residents, who have been electing Democrats to the State Senate for the past 3 decades.

Sarah is busy pissing off Alaskan legislators in both parties, by refusing to meet with them to discuss acceptance of stimulus funds, and by attempting to exercise some legislative powers. The Governess really wants to be a Queen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Man, we really dodged a bullet in November.
Whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ain't that the truth
I was nervous enough when the repukes gave Chimpy the nuclear codes, but after seeing a Youtube somewhere of Palin doing some weird evangelistic prayer with a witch doctor whacko, then my nervousness radar really started spiking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomm2thumbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 05:48 AM
Response to Original message
3. if god had wanted a public vote, god would have made it a public vote - eh Sarah?

same holds true that if god thought Sarah Palin was meant to be in office in Washington, she's already be in office in Washington.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. The process of Palin choosing Grussendorf wasn't public

Nor was the Republican replacement in the legislature she approved last year.

This is blowing up in Palin's face big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Titonwan Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wah?
Time to whip out the witchdoctor buster guy and sort this out the WASILLA way! Heog ja ja! Mewomtie dazo deezo floom! Ha Ha! I love Sarah. She's makes me laugh when I'm blue. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Somewhere on the 'net I read being a Dem for a FULL year was a requirement for the seat
and the guy sho SHE wants to be seated literally just "discovered" a few weeks or a month ago that he was registered as a REPUKE! Is Palin going to rewrite the seating requirements????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harpboy_ak Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-04-09 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The full-year requirement is a party requirement
The Juneau Democratic District Committee used the full-year requirement as one of their criteria in reviewing applicants for nomination, but it is not a statutory requirement.

The Governess, however, wants to be Queen. And she's been egged on by Paulette Simpson, the Dragon Lady of Alaska Repugnican politics, who wants to create division among Democrats in Senate District B.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC