|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
rawstory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:13 AM Original message |
Obama picks Sonia Sotomayor for Supreme Court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. I Am So Not Excited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Since when does he not know how to "play for keeps?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:38 AM Response to Reply #1 |
5. Do you have any evidence whatsoever that Sotomayor will be disastrous? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:03 AM Response to Reply #5 |
72. Well at least we can predict that baseball will be well adjudicated. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. in your opinion. hardly some undying truth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. No one's opinion, including Obama's (or yours), is "some undying truth." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:22 AM Response to Reply #1 |
28. What !??!?!?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:36 AM Response to Reply #28 |
90. That post was written long before any appointment, or even vacancy, was announced |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kid a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:09 AM Response to Reply #1 |
76. wow... do you know how foolish your post is? I am so unimpressed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:10 AM Response to Reply #1 |
98. Name the really bad appointments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iowa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:27 PM Response to Reply #98 |
163. OK... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:31 PM Response to Reply #163 |
197. Pretend you're Obama and replace his appointments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:35 AM Response to Reply #1 |
112. Your "concern" is duly noted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LSK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
180. what an embarrassing post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 05:58 PM Response to Reply #1 |
215. Another DOOM AND GLOOM post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:31 AM Response to Original message |
2. AP says it's Sotomayor. SCOTUS overdue for a Hispanic and another woman, IMO, but is she the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fluffdaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:18 AM Response to Reply #2 |
26. Older then I would have like yes, Hopfully we will get 20 years of left leaning opinions out of her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:29 AM Response to Reply #26 |
34. Centrist opinions may be more likely, if descriptions of her are correct. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:11 AM Response to Reply #34 |
56. I think the biggest litmus test for whether she's centrist is her position on corporate personhood! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
livefreest (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:31 AM Response to Reply #56 |
88. NOW, THIS IS WORTH DISCUSSING |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:39 AM Response to Reply #56 |
91. The Problem with Using Corporate Personhood as a Litmus Test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:48 AM Response to Reply #91 |
92. It never "became law" in the constitution. Only a court clerk felt it should be law! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
On the Road (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:05 AM Response to Reply #92 |
96. It May Have Been True at the Time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:12 AM Response to Reply #96 |
100. If it is brought up as an issue protecting stare decisis without legislation to take it down... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlbertCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:37 PM Response to Reply #56 |
135. corporate personhood...100%? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:45 PM Response to Reply #135 |
137. Yeah, this ruling is a bit confusing to me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #56 |
172. I disagree that that is an important litmus test. Things like separation of church and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:40 PM Response to Reply #172 |
201. It is because it is NOT a constitutional protection! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:37 PM Response to Reply #56 |
222. The US Constitution is a limit on GOVERNMENT RIGHTS, not PERSONAL RIGHTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:57 PM Response to Reply #34 |
143. I agree, this goes along with our president's move towards center. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:36 PM Response to Reply #143 |
166. I don't think Obama has to move to get to the center. And I don't think it has to do only with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:25 AM Response to Reply #2 |
31. Clinton appointed her to the Court of Appeals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:31 AM Response to Reply #31 |
35. Who said she was a Republican? However, if Bush appointed her, she certainly cannot be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:54 AM Response to Reply #35 |
48. Daniel Patrick Moynihan "appointed" her, not Bush Sr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:47 PM Response to Reply #48 |
168. Please, I don't believe for a second that it was that clear cut and Bush 41 had no say at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:22 AM Response to Reply #35 |
57. I don't think you get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:06 PM Response to Reply #57 |
174. Sorry, what you are saying is simply not Constitutionally possible. A single Senator cannot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:26 PM Response to Reply #174 |
182. HamdenRice is correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 06:03 PM Response to Reply #182 |
217. The poster is knee jerking and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #35 |
165. Didn't Bush appoint Souter? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #165 |
176. Yes, and Bush's position is that Souter betrayed him, as I had posted in Reply #35. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlexanderProgressive (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:41 PM Response to Reply #176 |
223. You don't mention that Clinton promoted Sotomayor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlexanderProgressive (238 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:03 PM Response to Reply #35 |
220. Bush appointed Souter, a very liberal judge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deaniac21 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 10:52 AM Response to Reply #220 |
235. Didn't Ike appoint Warren? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #31 |
65. Moynihan wasn't much of a Democrat, either . . .!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
114. 54 is too old??? OMFG. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kegler14 (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:31 PM Response to Reply #114 |
156. She has type 1 diabetes and so is at much higher risk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:34 PM Response to Reply #156 |
199. Deleted message |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:19 PM Response to Reply #114 |
177. Given how young Bush 43's appointees were, yes, I would have preferred a younger judge. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #2 |
126. Bush also appointed Souter ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:21 PM Response to Reply #126 |
179. Please see Reply # 35. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
waiting for hope (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:29 PM Response to Reply #179 |
221. Got it - and Sandra Day O'Connor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WyLoochka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:37 AM Response to Original message |
4. At the same time as the CA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InfiniteThoughts (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
7. seems like a good choice .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Bacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:43 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Killer Joe is calling her "The Most Liberal Pick" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InfiniteThoughts (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:08 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. that's finalizes it for me ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:33 AM Response to Reply #18 |
36. He has not yet voted; and I would not base anything on Lieberman, one way or the other. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:10 AM Response to Reply #36 |
55. Um... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:23 PM Response to Reply #55 |
181. Um.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:56 AM Response to Reply #18 |
50. Yes Yes for her ~ If Boring Joe says No ,I say Yes! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbonds (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:46 AM Response to Reply #50 |
61. You do realize that Joe would say that about ANY pick Obama made. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:07 PM Response to Reply #61 |
150. I do realize ~ he is trying for the #1 Thug slot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:14 PM Response to Reply #61 |
152. That goes for almost any pick The President picks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:10 AM Response to Reply #9 |
78. that ass would say that anyone Obama chooses is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
105. OMG, The party in power gets to have its say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:12 AM Response to Reply #7 |
23. The New Haven firefighters' case will be front and center of their attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:35 AM Response to Reply #23 |
38. I hope the SCOTUS finds a way to avoid reversing her, maybe by remanding for more findings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:54 AM Response to Reply #23 |
68. Have they ever given any evidence of "reverse discrimination" . .. ??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:43 PM Response to Reply #68 |
202. Expect them to trot out arguments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
8. This will be the chance for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Odin2005 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:53 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I thought the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:58 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. It was the nicest thing that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CBR (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:06 AM Response to Reply #11 |
17. Latina... they fight hard against her, they lose the vote forever. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mystieus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:09 AM Response to Reply #17 |
97. And we have a winner!! lock thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saigon68 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:13 AM Response to Reply #11 |
24. That asshole belongs in a trunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
30. I think even the Republicans are too savvy to make a cheap remark about her ethnicity. They have |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Are_grits_groceries (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:34 AM Response to Reply #30 |
37. At this point, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:43 AM Response to Reply #37 |
42. I hope you're more correct than I am, but people on the edge of a cliff tend to watch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:56 AM Response to Reply #30 |
120. The smart ones won't make cheap ones. But how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:26 PM Response to Reply #120 |
183. Oh, I meant elected Republicans or Steele. Limbaugh and his kind--I make no comment on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #183 |
196. But isn't LImbaugh the leader of the Republican Party? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noiretextatique (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 06:42 PM Response to Reply #183 |
219. foxx and bachman are elected |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:30 PM Response to Reply #30 |
155. they were already dog whistling.. she's an affirmative action pick- not that bright... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emsimon33 (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:03 AM Response to Reply #8 |
52. lol--but too true |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
InfiniteThoughts (322 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:25 AM Response to Reply #8 |
103. Ben Nelson comment ... real funny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fujiyama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:11 PM Response to Reply #8 |
129. I can just imagine Rahm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
10. WTF! How does she represent me? The last guy inserted two white males. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JayMusgrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:58 AM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I love your humor! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:39 AM Response to Reply #10 |
39. Yep. And about damn time, too! (j/k) Fortunately, the SCOTUS is supposed to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Xenotime (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:26 AM Response to Reply #10 |
104. This is a great opportunity for progressive views to really come forward. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
15. A centrist. What a surprise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jakes Progress (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:09 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. And the republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #20 |
190. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fluffdaddy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:11 AM Response to Reply #15 |
22. Prove she's a centrist? please post links of her "centrist" opinions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #22 |
161. She is considered a political centrist by the American Bar Association Journal & the New York Time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:03 AM Response to Reply #15 |
51. Really? The head of the liberal Constitution Accountability Center has high praise for Sotomayor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:31 AM Response to Reply #51 |
59. "she is strongly opposed by conservative groups" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:08 PM Response to Reply #59 |
128. Sotomayor ruled in favor of minimum wage for homeless workers in class action suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bettyellen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:23 PM Response to Reply #59 |
153. so your opinion of her is based only on the Prez's other appointments, LOL? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 09:57 AM Response to Reply #153 |
232. "my opinion of her" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #51 |
184. Quoting conservative groups to try to prove she is liberal does not do it. They consider anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:56 AM Response to Reply #15 |
70. A woman is good . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:22 AM Response to Reply #15 |
84. I don't like far lefties either. a centralist is fine with me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:44 PM Response to Reply #84 |
185. You are entitled to prefer a centrist. However, the choices are not only centrist or "far leftie." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:58 AM Response to Reply #15 |
121. Why are you defining her as a centrist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #121 |
164. Here is why: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #164 |
171. Thanks for the link. Her decisions don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lasher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:14 PM Response to Reply #171 |
175. Keep in mind, the Republican noise machine is in high gear right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:28 PM Response to Reply #175 |
195. Thanks for all the links. Very informative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #171 |
186. Bar Associations would review all her decisions before coming up with a description, not just one or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spiritual_gunfighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:01 AM Response to Original message |
16. Get ready for Republican nut jobs |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClarkUSA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:10 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Faux News: She's "too liberal"!!! RNC gears up for fundraising and a fight. Alert the teabaggers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JayMusgrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:54 AM Response to Reply #21 |
49. Teabaggers are lining up. This will be their big issue for the year |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:05 AM Original message |
McCain was born in Panama too... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
188. Supposedly (and probably). McCain was born on a U.S. base in Panama to two U.S. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 05:01 PM Response to Reply #188 |
208. Yeah, I wonder what the right wing would do with someone like me... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iris27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:16 PM Response to Reply #188 |
231. Except Puerto Rico is US soil. No customs forms needed to mail stuff there, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 10:31 AM Response to Reply #49 |
233. Sonia Sotomayor was born in The Bronx NY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crowman1979 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:53 AM Response to Reply #21 |
67. If Faux News hates it, then you know it's good! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #67 |
189. Not really. Faux News hates anyone left of O'Reilly.There is a lot of territory between that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #21 |
145. Typical fund raising tactic. They have to say this. Did you expect them to be overjoyed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FailureToCommunicate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:08 AM Response to Original message |
19. Thank God we still have legal/intellectual GIANTS like Thomas and Scalia! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elleng (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
25. Excellent, from Raw: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dappleganger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
27. I think she's a great choice too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoonzang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
29. Too old...but whatev. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:27 AM Response to Reply #29 |
33. She's 55. That's on the outer edge, imo, but not too old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FailureToCommunicate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:39 AM Response to Reply #33 |
41. "Don't trust anyone over thirty" Or is it twenty? Wait, what did I come in here for? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:14 PM Response to Reply #33 |
191. It is old in comparison to Dummya's picks. I was hoping for someone who is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RebelOne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:39 AM Response to Reply #29 |
40. Why is she too old? She has at least 15 to 20 more years. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wickerwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:35 PM Response to Reply #40 |
134. She's also a type 1 diabetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:22 PM Response to Reply #40 |
192. It is not so much that she is too old in the abstract. It is that Dummya's appointees were so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:15 AM Response to Reply #29 |
79. Much younger and she wouldn't have enough experience. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:43 PM Response to Reply #79 |
203. How much is enough? At 45, a lawyer could have 20 or more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pnwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 06:03 PM Response to Reply #203 |
216. Clarence Thomas was woefully underqualified. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
northernlights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:54 AM Response to Reply #29 |
93. I'm 55 -- there's a LOT to be said for it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phoonzang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:18 AM Response to Reply #93 |
102. My nose has stopped running with snot years ago. Well maybe like 3 years ago, but that's beside |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #93 |
206. Realistically, your vote on the SCOTUS is going to be with the right or the left. It |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wednesdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:26 AM Response to Original message |
32. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:46 AM Response to Original message |
43. There's one huge problem with Sotomayor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:51 AM Response to Reply #43 |
46. HUGH DRAWBACK!!11 Impeach Obama - I wanted a METS fan!!1! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emsimon33 (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:05 AM Response to Reply #46 |
53. Settle only for a Red Sox fan! Yankees!!! Oh no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFW (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #46 |
131. Hey, the radical right takes shit like that seriously! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gmudem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #46 |
167. She's a Yankees fan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:29 AM Response to Reply #43 |
106. Oh man. I wish I didn't know that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MajorChode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:45 AM Response to Reply #106 |
118. I can't help but think it calls her judgement into question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ronatchig (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
44. a question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:52 AM Response to Reply #44 |
47. No. I don't think it had been founded yet when she was at Yale, plus she's a Democrat. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
193. Her time at Yale has nothing to do with it. The Federalist Society is not only for students. It is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snowdays (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:48 AM Response to Original message |
45. Nice, very nice. He had a lot of qualified people to choose from. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riona (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
54. Okay folks.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
58. Very happy with this nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
60. Another Catholic on the Supreme Court. This makes SIX out of NINE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:47 AM Response to Reply #60 |
63. Not all Catholics are FREAKS. There's such an entity as a "liberal Catholic." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:53 AM Response to Reply #63 |
66. Yes, I know. I'm one of them. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:54 AM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Cool, same here. But under DEEP COVER in my right-wing Parish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:02 AM Response to Reply #63 |
71. It would be better to have a Judge who believes in her own right to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:15 AM Response to Reply #71 |
101. You can be a Catholic and personally "pro-life" without IMPOSING those beliefs on others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:32 AM Response to Reply #101 |
110. Yes, absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:25 PM Response to Reply #101 |
154. You could be . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:33 PM Response to Reply #101 |
198. The issue is, will the Pope say you are an obedient Catholic if you are pro-choice? That |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:32 AM Response to Reply #71 |
109. Many, many, many Catholics are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:37 PM Response to Reply #109 |
200. How people self-describe is one thing. What your parish priest and/or the Pope say may |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JerseygirlCT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #200 |
218. Well, I'm pretty sure I can guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sofa king (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #63 |
141. Otherwise known as "Catholics destined for Hell." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:50 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. That is a concern... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:07 AM Response to Reply #64 |
74. I could easily say that Catholics are overrepresented on the Court . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Baby Snooks (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:37 AM Response to Reply #74 |
115. He's not perverted... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:57 PM Response to Reply #64 |
170. Well, since Catholics as a whole voted for Obama by 53%, we're not all RW antichoicers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:46 AM Response to Original message |
62. I like it! I like her. :-) NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NBachers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
73. Let the republic slimeballs try to politically invalidate her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
iamthebandfanman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
75. so we let them have TWO RIGHT WING NUTS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
77. Anyone taking bets on a successful Republican blockage of this appointment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dana_b (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:18 AM Response to Reply #77 |
82. I disagre |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digidigido (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:18 AM Response to Reply #77 |
83. Nope, even the party of no can't try to block a centrist hispanic woman and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ezlivin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:22 AM Response to Reply #83 |
85. Damn. I hope so! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:56 AM Response to Reply #77 |
95. Couldn't we take THEIR idea and go "nuclear" on them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 05:00 PM Response to Reply #95 |
207. Democrats did not fillibuster judicial appointments. I am not sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cascadiance (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 07:55 PM Response to Reply #207 |
224. Actually the Rethugs did do so for one of LBJ's appointments (Abe Fortas)... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
80. Not pleased with this pick, not pleased with Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
digidigido (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:26 AM Response to Reply #80 |
87. I understand your rant, agree with much, but respectfully disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #87 |
205. I think most of the country is center and left of center, not right. (And thanks again, Bush Cheney |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #80 |
119. Who is your choice? And, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #119 |
210. DU posters do not have the staff and outside |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:25 PM Response to Reply #119 |
227. I am not in the loop for choosing a Justice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:00 PM Response to Reply #80 |
123. She is very pro-gay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #123 |
211. That is good news. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:27 PM Response to Reply #123 |
228. link please, proof please. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:43 PM Response to Reply #228 |
229. I don't have a link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 10:42 AM Response to Reply #228 |
234. A link I saw yesterday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
81. C-Span is running a "Moot Court" where Sotomayer participated . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
livefreest (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:23 AM Response to Original message |
86. congratulations to SUPREME COURT JUSTICE Sonia Sotomayor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
89. Being that she is from Puertorican background... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 10:54 AM Response to Reply #89 |
94. she is not from PR. she's from NY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:10 AM Response to Reply #94 |
99. I am familiar with... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:00 PM Response to Reply #99 |
124. It's not that your comment is critical of Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:16 PM Response to Reply #124 |
132. If I worked in Fox News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:32 PM Response to Reply #132 |
157. What is your dissenting argument? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:20 PM Response to Reply #157 |
178. I asked for info on her rulings while you used the monotonous meme of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stanwyck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:27 PM Response to Reply #178 |
194. Start with reading all of Lasher's posts on this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ooglymoogly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 09:51 PM Response to Reply #157 |
230. What is an argument is that she is a catholic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:43 PM Response to Reply #99 |
136. Are you "familiar with" the fact that NYC Puerto Ricans are overwhelmingly Democrats? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:03 PM Response to Reply #136 |
148. Overwhelmingly Democrat is also a generalization |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:32 PM Response to Reply #148 |
158. No, it's a statistic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:04 PM Response to Reply #158 |
173. Well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 03:56 PM Response to Reply #173 |
187. And you happen to be in Florida |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:30 AM Response to Reply #89 |
108. What an amazingly useless observation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:33 AM Response to Reply #108 |
111. Racist? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HamdenRice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:51 PM Response to Reply #111 |
139. Seems so. Your "analysis" presumes that Bronx Puerto Rican political beliefs are genetic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #139 |
146. That's an extensive "analysis" of a very "meaningless" short statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #139 |
212. Neither her schools, her genes or her honors tell us whether she is neocon, centrist or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Adelante (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:02 PM Response to Reply #89 |
125. Here is one ruling - on minimum wage for homeless workers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost-in-FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:04 PM Response to Reply #125 |
127. Thank you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
superconnected (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 05:04 PM Response to Reply #125 |
209. Good post! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:32 PM Response to Reply #89 |
226. Racial profiling rocks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCloud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:30 AM Response to Original message |
107. So if the naysayers are correct, Senate will not go along. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
No Elephants (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 05:25 PM Response to Reply #107 |
213. The nomination is his call and the likelihood is that a Democratic Senate will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wabbajack_ (669 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:36 AM Response to Original message |
113. Too moderate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hangman86 (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
116. So far so good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mosaic (851 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
117. A Great Day for Latinos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
La Lioness Priyanka (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 11:59 AM Response to Original message |
122. nice. good pick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
craigmatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:16 PM Response to Original message |
130. Obama has the repubs by the balls with this pick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lone_Star_Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:07 PM Response to Reply #130 |
151. How much of the Latino votes do they now hold? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Creideiki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
133. I'm so glad we voted for a President that would nominate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevsters (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
138. Let the Obstruction Begin!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wisteria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:03 PM Response to Reply #138 |
149. All part of the game. In the end we will have a moderate female member to the SC. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earcandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
140. I love it that she came up from poverty and is a self made woman! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Wizard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
142. How long before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim Sagle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 12:59 PM Response to Original message |
144. I like this pick. It will give the Republicans a chance to hurt themselves VERY BADLY, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:01 PM Response to Original message |
147. Ron Kuby said he's never won an appeal in her court. He says she's tough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:40 PM Response to Original message |
159. Looks like a pretty safe choice.......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
T Wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
160. This pick is probably as less-harmful to progressive values as could be expected from this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Prophet 451 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:12 PM Response to Original message |
162. Solid choice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 02:51 PM Response to Original message |
169. good pick, Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HOLOS (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 04:43 PM Response to Original message |
204. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
214. Deleted message |
troubledamerican (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-26-09 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
225. "Too Dumb Sotomayor" the Neocons accuse? From the Party of Dumb GWB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
downeyr (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-27-09 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
236. I'm not stoked for this either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC