Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Soldier gets month in jail for refusing deployment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:17 PM
Original message
Soldier gets month in jail for refusing deployment
Source: Houston Chronicle/AP

Soldier gets month in jail for refusing deployment
By ANGELA K. BROWN Associated Press Writer
Aug. 5, 2009, 12:26PM

FORT HOOD, Texas — A Fort Hood soldier was sentenced Wednesday to a month in jail for refusing to deploy to Afghanistan over his beliefs that the war violates international law.

Spc. Victor Agosto, 24, of Miami, pleaded guilty to disobeying lawful orders and was sentenced at the central Texas Army post. The judge also reduced his rank to the Army's lowest level, a private, which also was part of the maximum penalty he faced in his plea agreement with the military.

Also, Agosto cannot be discharged at a level lower than other-than-honorable conditions, an administrative discharge. A discharge was not mentioned in the hearing, but Agosto is expected to be released from the Army after completing his jail term.

Before he was sentenced during the hourlong military hearing, he told the judge he should not be jailed because he posed no threat to anyone.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/6561589.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Politicalboi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. If only more would do this
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 01:32 PM by Politicalboi
Who would they send? 30 days in the hole to have a clear conscience is a deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
33. An "other-than-honorable" discharge
will stick with him for the rest of his life. there is no way to expunge that label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Geez, he should have questioned Obama's birth certificate instead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. So the birfer gets re-assigned and this guy gets jail?
That figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. well...
the birther case was different. The birther had volunteered to go and he was still within his legal time limit to retract his request to be deployed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
27. Yes, the birther was different. The birther acted in total bad faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The Birther was not active duty
He was a reservist that volunteered for an assignment. He had the option to "un-volunteer" any time up until he reported. Since he never actually reported for active duty the Army considered his lawsuit a voluntary withdrawal of his request for assignment.

He never actually refused to obey orders - he was simply asking "clarification" of Obama's status as CinC. The Army rightfully refused to play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. and that was with an interesting timeline ...
According to Wikipedia:

hooked up with Oily Taintz 2/1/2009 ...

requested the 1-year Afghanistan assignment 5/8/2009, to begin 7/15/2009 ...

filed the lawsuit 7/8/2009 ... (hmm, instructed on how to proceed by O.T.???)

case dismissed 7/16/2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. It was very much a set up
that's why the Army refused to play along - they didn't want to give him a platform to bash the CinC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Now why would he refuse to be deployed...and then go for a plea agreement?
either you have the balls to stand up for your beliefs, or else ...WHY do it HALF WAY??which is exactly what he did...wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Amy interviewed him about an hour before his trial. He said
he didn't go for CO status because he's not against all wars. It was a good interview.

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/8/5/hours_before_court_martial_army_resister

Audio, video, transcript at link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
29. Why does a plea agreement render him "ball-less"? Your conclusion is odd.
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 06:09 AM by No Elephants
And, the existence or not of testicles has nothing to do with courage, either.

I don't know anything about this man's testicles, but he seems to have plenty of courage, both physical and moral. He signed up to serve and is not looking for either a discharge or a way out of combat missios. And I am sure his moral stand is not going to make his life in the military easier--and he knew that when he took his stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. The precident is pretty clear
the "other-than-honorable" discharge and 30 days in jail or if he fought and lost (and he would have lost), a dishonorable discharge and 10 years in Leavenworth...seems like a nobrainer to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. you made my point for me...thanx...
So the guy refused a direct order, after he VOLUNTEERED himself into the service, while knowing what the consequences would be...IMO, IF it was important enough for him to refuse to deploy, then he should have taken whatever the resulting punishment was and proved just HOW important that decision was to him...he should not have been allowed a plea bargain...no brainer??? you are correct..it was a no brainer(in more ways than one)...he got out of going, and then he got out of paying for HIS DECISION TO DISOBEY an order, by using a plea bargain...so how about all the guys who went, and never gave a thought to disobeying the order to deploy???

I was a military wife for 10 years, way back...MY HUSBAND would have never gotten away with such a thing...had he disobeyed an order to report for duty somewhere, (it used to be called going AWOL)...the minute he was found, he would have been arrested and taken to the lock up....there would have been NO plea bargain...there'd have been a courts martial and they'd have sent him to Leavenworth and thrown away the key...AND he'd have gotten a dishonorable discharge to boot...even those who had been drafted would not have gotten away with this sort of thing..let alone someone who willingly entered the service and as of HIS enlistment date...AGREED to do what he was told..but then..things have obviously changed, and not necessarily for the better...

Disclaimer: I have never been for this "war" and have felt it was a mistake all along...I am sorry that our guys have gone over there and died as a result...I am sorry for the ones who come back mentally or physically damaged and still have their whole lives ahead of them...However, I don't believe that once they volunteer, they should be let off as easy as this kid has been..I am sure, no one held a gun to his head and told him to volunteer...HE CHOSE to do so..Just like he CHOSE to disobey a direct order to report for duty...and I don't think he should have been rewarded for conduct unbecoming, because to me that's what it is...nor is it fair to the rest of his fellow soldiers...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. I don't disagree
and had this long hard conversation with my own son before he enlisted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey, would you rather spend a tour in Afghanistan or a month in jail?
And with the latter, you also get out of the army!

Well, duh, I wonder which is better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
28. I would rather spend ten years in jail than a month killing in Afghanistan--or
anywhere. But then, I did not sign up for the military. This guy did--and he refuses CO status. So, you really don't know what HE thinks is better, which is all that is relevant to his story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. Unless CO status was offered as a plea option
it is almost impossible to attain. He has already stated he isn't CO or he wouldn't have been in the army in the first place. CO status is almost an impossible defense outside of the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
florida08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. the article stated
He said he had remained on post and went to work every day since refusing to deploy after learning a few months ago that the Army was keeping him beyond his enlistment date. He said he did not use drugs or go absent without leave, as other soldiers have done to avoid deployment.

Now in an all volunteer army they should have an out or alternatives when they've served their time but of course they don't. They can just keep extending or repeat your tours regardless how stressed you are. At least they won't give him a dishonorable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. Is this the one Orly was advising?
Good...! And can we deport her ass while we're at it for slandering the President and advising active military personnel to disobey orders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. No that idiot is a reservist who volunteered to go, then
protested going because of the bc issue. It was a set up to bring a lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
12. You cannot convert a man's heart which is rooted in the tree of justice.
Jail will only make him stronger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Soldier Who Didn’t Obey Orders Is Jailed
Source: NYTimes

HOUSTON — A soldier at Fort Hood who fought his deployment to Afghanistan and stopped obeying orders was sentenced to a month in jail and demoted to private in a military court on Wednesday morning.

Victor Agosto, a 24-year-old signalman with the III Corps, ripped a patch showing his specialist rank off his uniform after an emotional hearing in front of an Army captain in which he had told the court he believed the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan violated international law, his lawyer, James M. Branum, said. Later, about 20 antiwar protesters cheered Private Agosto as he was taken to jail, the lawyer said.

“He’s not opposed to all wars; he is opposed to this war, because it is not a war of self-defense,” Mr. Branum said.

Under a plea agreement, Private Agosto will be discharged after he serves his time in jail in Belton, Tex., Mr. Branum said.

Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/06/us/06soldier.html?hp



He stood up for his beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Takes some guts to go jail for your beliefs. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I wonder what part of his beliefs made him join the military
seems kind of unhinged, don't you think?

If he's so much against it, why join at all?

Bizarre, in my mind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzNick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Sorry, but he signed for it
And the war in Afghanistan was approved by UN resolution 1386.

Understood it was a peace keeping mission originally, but there is legitimacy anyway.

I know a few kids who signed up and are being sent there, some disagree, but are doing what they signed for.

And yes, I served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I am not argueing that he should be allowed leave the military whenever he wants,
I just saying it takes some guts to put "your money (or freedom) where your mouth is."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #17
25. Legitimacy or not, it is not a war of self-defense. Besides, UN Resolution 1386 doesn't
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 05:17 AM by No Elephants
say Afghanistan is to become a puppet or client of the United States for as long as the US prefers.

Resolutio 1378 was adopted as one of several UN responses to 911. At what point does the rationale of hunting down the perps of 911 in Afghanistan wear out?

All that aside, if this guy truly has a conscience problem with Afghanistan, then he has a conscience problem and that is all that matters. If he is willing to go to jail to obey the dictates of his conscience, so be it. That is a lot more honorable in my eyes than requesting an assignment in order to challenge Obama's right to be President in court.

On the birther's theory, Obama, not being President, cannot order him to go anywhere or to do anything. So, his accepting reassignment proves how bogus all his actions were. In my view, he should be in jail.

Thank you for your service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. War of self defense? I guess fighting the Germans in WW2 would have been out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:11 AM
Response to Reply #20
30. Since the issues involved are nothing alike, I don't know how you can jump to that conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #30
37. Just wondering about the statement. Quite strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annm4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. He is very brave and I'm proud of him
He did two tours and was due to be out tomorrow. He was stop lost to Afghanistan.

that is BS. F the freaking Pentagon. No one signed up for this BS. They changed the contract on them and then call them cowards and other things cause they don't want to go back.

I have a cousin and know another guy who have been life long military. One is 46 the other 40.. neither have gone to Iraq or Afghanistan. one has been in Hawaii for the past 5 years.

I'm glad he only has to do 1 month. I hope more refuse, and I wish a was a politician so I could try to make sure they still get all there benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #22
42. I was wondering if he was stop loss-ed......
Stop loss is akin to slavery in my book. You honoured your end of the deal and the army doesn't honour theirs. So they keep you there tour after tour. You have done your duty and they won't let you go. I could see him having a change of heart-people do. When I went in I was single. My daughter was born just months before the first Gulf War and they would have had to have to had armed guards drag me away (breast feeding moms can get really ugly really fast).

I found out (when the Gulf War first started) that even though I was in the IRR and had been for a long time (past my initial commitment) I could still be called up and made to serve due to my occupation-even though I had been out of service for 8 years. Well I got my butt out, never re upped, and didn't leave a fore warding address. I kept a low profile for a long time and although I could be grabbed again, the older I get the less desirable I become.

Stop-loss-ed and forced to do tours....the judge should have given even a lighter wrist slap but what he did was ok. He is a hero in my book for standing up for his rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big_Mike Donating Member (274 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
19. He got off too lightly
It could have and, IMHO, should have been much harsher. He should have been given at least a couple of years. Somebody must have thought he was otherwise a good troop. Yeah, they slammed him with a Summary Court-Martial. Only someone guilty or a fool takes a Summary Court, since the person preferring the charge against you is the judge convicting you. If he thought he was right, he should have refused that and gone for a trial by jury with a Special Court-Martial. However, at that level, he could get a Bad Conduct Discharge, or if it was moved to a General Court-Martial, a Dishonorable Discharge.

Basically, he got an Article 15 on steroids. He skated on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dschis Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Yep
I guess he wanted to get in the press. A lot of you don't know it, but when you sign up for thee years you are actually signing up for six years. Used to be you served the other three as inactive reserve, but they could call you up at any time. I seen that in the Gulf War Senior.

But then I'm retired and they can call me anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:15 AM
Response to Reply #24
32. How long you sign up for has nothing to do with the issues in the OP. The man is not
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 06:31 AM by No Elephants
saying he's not subject to being called to active duty, nor is he refusing combat missions anywhere but in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
31. Baloney, Big Mike. 212 posts since before July, 2003. All righty, then.
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 06:39 AM by No Elephants
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. I agree with mike, Lots of people hated
our participation in IFOR/KFOR, lots of people said the same shit. Illegal to send NG overseas (really people said that), fuck bill clinton, etc, but at the end of the day everyone showed up, and bitched over there about a different range of topics.

Orders are given or taken, not negotiated. You join the military and figure this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
40. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 04:09 AM
Response to Original message
23. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
26. Guess this thread drew the cons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
39. More heroic than any armchair chickenhawk who denounces him.
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC