Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

IAEA chief: should have 'howled' louder on Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 02:34 PM
Original message
IAEA chief: should have 'howled' louder on Iraq
Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON, Aug 10 (Reuters) - The head of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency said he should have "howled harder" on Iraq and that the war was the most "dissatisfying moment" of his life.

Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, in responding to 10 questions in Time magazine, also said the jury is out on whether Iran was developing nuclear weapons.

One of the main justifications for the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 by the administration of President George W. Bush was the assertion that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. No such weapons were found in the years since the war began.

"The most dissatisfying moment of my life, of course, was when the Iraq war was launched. That hundreds of thousands of people lost their lives on the basis of fiction, not facts, makes me shudder," ElBaradei said.

Asked what had been a "bad judgment call" on his part, ElBaradei responded: "I should probably, before the Iraq war, have screamed and howled harder and louder to prevent people from misusing the information that was made available by us."

Read more: http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N10338932.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, you should have, Mr. El-Baradei
I think there was some miscalculation on the part of a lot of people about just how evil the Bush administration was. The Bushistas were often credited for good faith negotiations where there was absolutely no reason for doing so. I think Mr. El-Baradei was gulled into thinking that the Bush administration was operating on the up and up. Now that the true dimensions of the evil that is anything associated with the name Bush have become apparent even to the gullible, it's a damn shame they weren't listening just a little closer to us folks who were shouting at them that they were dealing with evil. Nope, just a bunch of dirty fucking hippies over here; can't believe for a moment that those nice Republicans in the Bush administration aren't all operating with the best of intentions.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. funny the stones people grow when they no longer would have to suffer consequences from doing the
right thing when it mattered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. It wouldn't have helped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. You can make up for it by howling even a little about Iran. Do your job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasi2006 Donating Member (544 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. It would not have mattered. Ask Condi
Saddam had complied with what they asked of him in his 12,000 page report on the destruction and status of Iraq WMDs. 8,000 of those pages never made it to the public. The administration was locked and loaded for invading Iraq. Period!! If you ask me, what we did to Iraq and Saddam and his family were war crimes of the highest order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well gee, that makes up for a MILLION DEAD IRAQIS, huh?
NT!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-11-09 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
8. The UN inspectors were in Iraq, doing their job, when W announced his invasion was imminent:
nobody stood up. The UN barely had time to pull its inspectors before the bombing started

As soon as W had his authorization, the machine was in motion

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC