Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dorgan Accuses White House of Unethically Politicizing Safety Warnings From the FDA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 02:54 PM
Original message
Dorgan Accuses White House of Unethically Politicizing Safety Warnings From the FDA
Source: OpenLeft

We've been aggressively covering the crazy story of the Obama administration crushing drug importation legislation that President Obama campaigned on as a presidential candidate and supported as a U.S. Senator. Now, days after the administration colluded with the pharmaceutical industry to kill the measure, one Democratic senator is making an extremely serious accusation.

The Food and Drug Administration is supposed to be one of those science-based agencies somewhat removed from politics - specifically to protect the integrity of its declarations on health and safety issues. That's why this story from the Wall Street Journal is very problematic:

There are several sets of fingerprints in the Senate chamber where (drug importation) legislation died, including some from the White House, says Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND). "They did not support this," and worked with Democratic Senate leaders to kill it in order to move the larger bill forward, he said in an interview. The amendment failed in the Senate Tuesday evening...

Dorgan said he can't get answers from the administration about what's going on, though he called the White House and FDA prior to the vote.

Last week, he said he heard rumors that the FDA was going to send a letter objecting to drug importation on safety grounds, which he has said is a bogus reason. He said he called FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, who said she knew nothing about such a letter.

He said his timeline shows that a letter, signed by Hamburg questioning the safety of drug imports, was sent 24 hours later to a few senators who opposed importation. That piece of paper became a rallying cry for other senators who voted down Dorgan's amendment.

"I think the letter was prompted, probably drafted somewhere else," like "the White House" Dorgan said.

The White House has not responded to repeated calls and emails. The FDA did not immediately comment.


Read more: http://www.openleft.com/diary/16550/did-the-white-house-political-staff-unethically-pressuremanipulate-the-fda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PearliePoo2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am sitting here feeling like I've been "gut-kicked"
What the fuck is this?
CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN?
From tears of joy a year ago....to nausea today.
Obama..my senators Murray and Cantwell? Liars.
We have been had.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChiciB1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. More Than HAD, We Are Basically Being IGNORED! I Don't Which Is Worse!! n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. same thing - being ignored is exactly the same as HAD
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 09:13 PM by wordpix
Ignoring your opposition is a tactic that says, "You don't exist. You're bugging me, but I can't even bother to swat at you."

That works until something large comes along---in this case, Obama's base is outraged and if there's one thing we can all agree on, it's lowering the price of prescript. drugs through reimportation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. In that case
Byron Dorgan is almost your Senator. His wife is from Everett.

He's one of the best guys out there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like the B.S. rumor about Nelson being threatened with base closures
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 03:50 PM by Tempest
Who are the Senators who received the letter, Dorgan?

He's full of shit, IMHO.


And since when has a story from the WSJ been considered a reliable source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
t0dd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It's becoming harder and harder to shield Obama from criticism, isn't it? nt
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 04:37 PM by t0dd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zogtheobvious Donating Member (119 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's becoming harder & harder to want to do so, unfortunately. (which I guess was your point. ;) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harkadog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I'm sure he/she is up to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. Well, the MO is starting to look familiar
especially when anyone has threatened the WH deal with Pharma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 04:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-18-09 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. this jives exactly with what Milbank wrote in WaPo right after the vote. Article here:
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 09:09 PM by wordpix
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/20...

President Obama writes a new health reform prescription

By Dana Milbank
Wednesday, December 16, 2009

On the campaign trail, Barack Obama vowed to take on the drug industry by allowing Americans to import cheaper prescription medicine. "We'll tell the pharmaceutical companies 'thanks, but no, thanks' for the overpriced drugs -- drugs that cost twice as much here as they do in Europe and Canada," he said back then.

On Tuesday, the matter came to the Senate floor -- and President Obama forgot the "no, thanks" part. Siding with the pharmaceutical lobby, the administration successfully fought against the very idea Obama had championed.

"It's got to be a little awkward," said Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.).

It's even more awkward for millions of Americans who are forced to pay up to 10 times the prices Canadians and Europeans pay for identical medication, often produced in the same facilities by the same manufacturers, simply because the U.S. government refuses to rein in drug prices. snip

One after the other, the drug industry's friends from pharmaceutical-manufacturing states New Jersey, Delaware and North Carolina went to the floor Tuesday to cite the FDA letter.

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-Bristol-Myers Squibb) warned that "you may have a heart attack" because of counterfeit medicine from abroad.

"This is a matter of life or death," agreed Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-Merck).

Carper (D-AstraZeneca) cited "remaining safety and soundness and health concerns," while Sen. Kay Hagan (D-GlaxoSmithKline) voiced "serious doubts that we can adequately ensure the safety of the drug supply."

These arguments don't hold up well, considering that 40 percent of the active ingredients in American prescription drugs come from India and China, and that the latter slipped tainted heparin past the FDA. But fright was about the best argument opponents could use to defeat a popular proposal that would save the federal government $19 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Consumers would save many times that. snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-20-09 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. Yes, thank you for that link.
And the FDA politicized? I'm shocked! Please, they live in Pharma's pocket. I remember Obama campaigning on this. Cave-ins we can believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC