Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's partial history

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cayanne Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 02:25 PM
Original message
Bush's partial history
"Stringent military screening program may explain gaps on president's record"

http://www.spokesmanreview.com/breaking-news-story.asp?submitDate=200431401040

Poor George...he's got more questions to answer for. According to todays article, a previous disclosed document obtained by the Spokane Spokesman-Review, Bush's pilot code was among those covered by the Human Reliability Program. This program may have been used to stop Bush from flying Texas Air National Guard jets in 1972.

snip...
Military rules used in 1974 to ground two Washington Air National Guard airmen with access to nuclear weapons also applied to a Texas Air National Guard unit where Lt. George W. Bush was a fighter pilot.

Snip...
The Boston Globe, on the forefront of the issue, reported Feb. 12 that Bush's acknowledged 1972 suspension from flight status for failing to take a required physical should have generated an investigation and subsequent trail of documents, which have not been found.
Snip...

A second previously unreleased document obtained by the newspaper, a declassified Air Force Inspector General's report on the Washington case, states that human reliability rules applied to all Air National Guard units in the 1970s. From 1968 to 1973, Bush was assigned to the 111th Fighter Interceptor Squadron at Ellington Air Force Base in Houston.

Snip...
‘‘The Human Reliability Program, in a nutshell, applied to every U.S. Air Force and Air Guard pilot in any aircraft they would fly,” said Marty Isham, a former Air Force briefing officer.
But if the human reliability rules were invoked, as they were in thousands of other cases, Bush may not have voluntarily stopped flying.
There is no mention of the Human Reliability Program in the documents released by the White House.

"James Hogan, a records coordinator at the Pentagon, said senior Defense Department officials had directed the National Guard Bureau not to respond to questions about Bush's military records."

Air Defense Command


There's a lot more to read in the article.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow! That's a lot to absorb in one reading.
A lot of it we've seen before, but this Human Reliability Report is new to me. Very interesting and very damning. More than anything else, it shows the Bushies deliberatly obfuscating military records.

Jr is toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Junior aWol never flew a jet solo. I stick to my gut feeling until proven
Edited on Sun Mar-14-04 03:16 PM by dArKeR
otherwise!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozvotros Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wow...
Lots of great stuff there. Would make great reading for a doubter on this subject. I liked the mention that those defending him are people that Bush promoted, hired or who were involved in his bogus admissions and promotions. Best of all is the new revelation that he was considered unfit to handle nuclear weapons in the Human Reliability Program. Clearly as a lying, prevaricating, drug addled SOB, he remains unfit. Can the HRP provisions be invoked now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pfitz59 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Missing a Flight Physical is cause to lose one's wings!
In Navy its called: FNAB ("fee-nab") Fleet Naval Aviator Evaluation Board. Should have convened within a month or so of missed physical. Where's Shrubbie's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fight_n_back Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. If he couldn't be trusted with Nukes then?
why shgould we trust him with such a HUGE amount of nukes now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
6. fabulous, courageous reporting
I hope all of you will follow the links to "contact us" and send these two reporters some thanks and congratulations. They've done more to advance the story than anyone in Washington D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-04 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. the most fascinating result of this investigation so far is the blocking
of any freedom of information releases of bush's nat'l guard record... what is the whitehouse using to justify this eggregious violation of the law... some trumped-up national security issue?

oh... let's see if i've got this right... bushco considers it a breach of national security if he is removed from office by Kerry being elected. will that stick?

under these mafiosos, probably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC