Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton aides told Bush team Al Qaeda posed worst threat facing the nation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
scottxyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 02:43 AM
Original message
Clinton aides told Bush team Al Qaeda posed worst threat facing the nation
Clinton Aides Plan to Tell 9/11 Panel of Warning Bush Team on al-Qaeda

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/20/politics/20PANE.html?pagewanted=1&hp

Senior Clinton administration officials called to testify next week before the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11 attacks say they are prepared to detail how they repeatedly warned their Bush administration counterparts in late 2000 that Al Qaeda posed the worst security threat facing the nation — and how the new administration was slow to act.

They said the warnings were delivered in urgent post-election intelligence briefings in December 2000 and January 2001 for Condoleezza Rice, who became Mr. Bush's national security adviser; Stephen Hadley, now Ms. Rice's deputy; and Philip D. Zelikow, a member of the Bush transition team, among others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 02:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have heard that this was in an interview on the History channel
Some time back, I guess about a year ago. Clinton, Mr President, said that they repeatedly warned about the al-Qaeda. In the Suskind book about Paul O'Neil, it is stated that on Jan 30, 2001 the plans were being made to attack Iraq. Wesley Clark said that he was contacted by the administration to say that Iraq had something to do with 9/11 and he refused. Shortly after that he stepped down from his post as NATO commander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. I read about this in the "Operation Ignore" section of Al Franken's book.
I had to put the book away for at least a week while I mulled over the ramifications. Either Bush was extremely incompetent, or there's something to the LIHOP idea. Either way, Bushco dropped the ball. Either way, they are at least in some way responsible for the lives lost on 9-11. It sickens me that they have used these lives to further their own imperialistic agenda. It sickens me that they are still using 9-11 and its victims to further their political aims.

They should be ashamed, but instead they flaunt the image of the dead. Sick! Sick! Sick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. "They should be ashamed..."
They should be more than ashamed... they should be emprisoned! :grr: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalManiacfromOC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. just a little comment....
Al Franken's book is the best piece of literature ever :D and im reading Price of Loyalty now. Also a great book. Both prove bush's slowness to react.... why do people consider him to be a good president for security? i thought he'd rather stay in Florida like on 9/11. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
willat Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
31. Iraq
"These people have no clue, they have no idea about the meaning of terrorism and the meaning of freedom," said Urfali, who said his family has lived in exile from Iraq since 1958. "These protesters talk in the name of Iraq and none of them are from Iraq, none of them lived in the terror."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 03:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. and if Kerry's team is on the ball, this will be all over the news for
weeks to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. Finally! I knew it!
I knew there was a reason big dog was holding out on his book! Boy, does he have a story to write! Bring it on, Bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gunit_Sangh Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I liked this comment

"But given the witnesses' prominence in the Clinton administration, supporters of Mr. Bush may see political motives in the testimony of some of them. "

Telling the truth under oath = political motives


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Put Condi on the stand.
There's one way to find out for sure. Put Condi on the stand. She'll either corroborate the allegation, or she'll perjure herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. she'll lie
and bushco under the dirction of rove will turn into a giant chameleon to get out of this.
it will be up to folks like us to keep the heat on. there are some democratic senators who will look for blood with this and they will need our support. as well as kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Of course she will lie
but it's so much fun to watch her when she does. She turns into a little booble head and she gets really nervous, blinking and talking faster. She's one of the worst liars I've ever seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IconoclastIlene Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. Truer words were never said.
We have been watching this bobble head for way to long; I'll be glad to say goodbye Condie...best of luck someplace else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Make sure to call them - you can do it TOLL FREE.
See my sig line.

It wouldn't hurt to call a republi-CON or two, just so they know that the "entire country" is NOT in lockstep with these fiends. They'll scoff at one person. They'll hesitate if it's a bunch of people. They'll get scared if there are legions of us - if they know we are on to them.

Please call, First Thing Monday Morning, if you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. She refuses to give sworn testimony
Which is essentially saying "I intend to lie."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #21
33. Who does she think she is..
swear the bitch in!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kool Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. Now you know why she refuses to testify
under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
8. WooHoo! Let the tapdancing begin!
However will the Regime keep this shit from coming out?

:evilgrin:
dbt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calimary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
26. They'll succeed if folks like us do nothing about it.
And as long as we let our reps do nothing about it. And we let our media do nothing about it.

The battle is on. Note my sig line, for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. they'll rely on their bootlickers to discredit the testimony
hannity, o'reilly, rush .... the usual suspects.

the fact that condi and her crew were told that about al-qaeda has been reported. franken's book, i believe, cited the time magazine and nyt stories that originally reported it.

the clinton folks' testimony may put it in nice, big capital letters so the boneheads in the mainstream media will, first of all, understand it. then, gee, maybe REPORT IT!?!?!?!?!

it's a pretty damning statement about the bush administration and where their priorities were.

we have got to get those bastards out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nicecakes Donating Member (126 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Too bad Clinton could not serve a third term
None of this would have happened if he was in command. In fact, he would have finally used that drone to missile AQ like bush should have done. When the Clinton library is completed it will clear up all the bad press that he has been served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalManiacfromOC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. well.......
thats why Gore was running
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
16. Star Wars Defense
I heard Clinton say that he told bush the first priority should be AQ, but bush wanted to build a Star Wars type missile defense system. Remember that?

Sandy Berger also told Rice that AQ was the biggest threat to the US, but she said that they felt that Iraq was the biggest threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yavin4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. If Gore Was President, 9/11 Would Not Have Happened
The intelligence community took their eyes off of AQ and focused on Iraq in order to please the new boss. That's how the terrorists got through.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Possibly. But one thing for sure is
we would not now be the enemy of the world and we would all be much safer as a result of not creating breeding grounds for terrorism all over the globe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale_Rider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. Why Is Bush And His National Security Team Acting So Guilty About 9/11?
Why Is Bush And His National Security Team Acting So Guilty About 9/11?
http://www.uspoliticstoday.com/news.php?nid=3889

Early in 2002, national security advisor Condoleezza Rice said "no one could have predicted that they would try to use a hijacked airplane as a missile…” to bring down the World Trade Towers.

Early in 2004 she is fighting hard not to have to repeat that claim under oath.

Because it was a lie.

In the immediate aftermath of the attack on New York and Washington most Americans were ready to believe that Osama Bin Laden hit us with a sucker punch that no one could have seen coming. The evidence is now overwhelming that the punch was telegraphed in advance and that gross incompetence let that punch land and do its terrible damage.

Just before Christmas, and under-reported by the press, was this startling statement by Thomas Kean, chairman of the independent commission investigating 9/11:

"This was not something that had to happen."


They knew of the threat and thousands of Americans died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
20. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-20-04 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
25. The bushie administration
was so arrogant that they wouldn't give any amount of validity to anything from the Clinton Administration. I just hang my head at how sad the entire situation is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
27. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
29. Philip D Zelikow - Executive Director 9/11 Commission AND
Consider this passage from a piece in today's Times ...

They said the warnings were delivered in urgent post-election intelligence briefings in December 2000 and January 2001 for Condoleezza Rice, who became Mr. Bush's national security adviser; Stephen Hadley, now Ms. Rice's deputy; and Philip D. Zelikow, a member of the Bush transition team, among others.
One official scheduled to testify, Richard A. Clarke, who was President Bill Clinton's counterterrorism coordinator, said in an interview that the warning about the Qaeda threat could not have been made more bluntly to the incoming Bush officials in intelligence briefings that he led.

At the time of the briefings, there was extensive evidence tying Al Qaeda to the bombing in Yemen two months earlier of an American warship, the Cole, in which 17 sailors were killed.

"It was very explicit," Mr. Clarke said of the warning given to the Bush administration officials. "Rice was briefed, and Hadley was briefed, and Zelikow sat in." Mr. Clarke served as Mr. Bush's counterterrorism chief in the early months of the administration, but after Sept. 11 was given a more limited portfolio as the president's cyberterrorism adviser.



Now we know about Rice and Hadley, her deputy. But how about Zelikow? He's a former NSC official from the first Bush administration and a close associate of Rice's. The two of them even wrote a book together.

He was in the key meetings where the warnings -- seemingly ignored -- about al Qaida came up. He seems like someone you'd want to talk to to find out what they were warned about and why they didn't take the warnings more seriously.

Well, you don't have to look far to find him. He runs the 9/11 Commission. Zelikow is the Executive Director of the Commission, which means he has operational control of the investigation under the overall management of the two co-chairs Tom Kean and Lee Hamilton.

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com /

Clinton Aides Plan to Tell Panel of Warning Bush Team on Qaeda


Mr. Zelikow, the director of the Miller Center of Public Affairs at the University of Virginia and a co-author of a 1995 book with Ms. Rice, has been the target of repeated criticism from some relatives of Sept. 11 victims. They have said his membership on the Bush transition team and his ties to Ms. Rice pose a serious conflict of interest for the commission, which is investigating intelligence and law-enforcement actions before the attacks.

Mr. Clarke said if Mr. Zelikow left any of the White House intelligence briefings in December 2000 and January 2001 without understanding the imminent threat posed by Al Qaeda, "he was deaf."

Mr. Zelikow said in an interview that he has recused himself from any part of the investigation that involves the transition, to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest. He said his participation in the Qaeda intelligence briefings was already well known. "The fact of what occurred in these briefings is not really disputed," he said.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0320-07.htm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michael_j_martin Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
30. Kind of old news
The fact that the Bush regime knew of an immanent threat to America from Al Qaeda and did nothing about it has been reported many times. The fact that the Clinton administration handed them documents outlining steps to take to prevent the attack has also been reported.

The real shocking stuff that is coming out is that Bush and Chaney are personally intimidating senators to help them cover up exactly what they knew. Sen. Tom Daschle is quoted as saying "in recent months the President on one occasion and the Vice President more than once had urged him to block any congressional investigation of this" (knowledge of an imminent terrorist attack).

You can hear the entire report if you go to www.cbsnews.com and then paste this into your address line:
illegal codevlaunch('clip=/media/2002/05/16/video509385.rm')

I have tried to get to this clip directly from CBS News links, but access to this clip seems to be blocked. Only after I copied the link and manually pasted it into the address was I able to see the report. I'm not suggesting a cover-up by CBS, I am expecting some bad web page administration.

The video made me ill after I watched the whole thing. If the Bush regime has learned anything from Nixon and Regan, they will have destroyed any evidence by now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michael_j_martin Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:39 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. Correction
That line did not paste correctly, here is the correct report line:

illegal codevlaunch('clip=/media/2002/05/16/video509385.rm')
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michael_j_martin Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. One more time
When I try to post this it does not post correctly, probably due to the HTML support on this board. You need to type the word javascript followed by : and the word vlaunch then this line('clip=/media/2002/05/16/video509385.rm')

Sorry about the technical difficulties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snazzy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. Here ya go--
http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/videoplayer/newVid/video_display_new.html?/media/2004/03/20/video607609.rm&vidId=3415&title=60$@$Preview$@$Richard$@$Clarke$@$&hitboxMLC=60minutes

Don't blame the CBS webmasters for bad webmastering; they know what they are doing, just have other motives... That link is a little complicated because they want to pop up a window (and really long!). Plus you need a cbs cookie I think. Don't we all!

And Welcome to DU (someone always beats me to that!).

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corgigal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
36. Maybe it's time
for the 9-11 widows and other seekers of truth to picket Condoleeza's home. I like to see her have them arrested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-21-04 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
37. That's all well and good, but a guy's gotta have a vacation
It gets tedious, sitting in the horizontal position eating pretzels in the WH all day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC