Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Union: Contractors weaken Federal Protective Service, placing feds at risk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 06:19 PM
Original message
Union: Contractors weaken Federal Protective Service, placing feds at risk
Source: Federal Daily

Federal building security is just not what it should be. So says yet another federal employees’ union, 15 years after terrorist Timothy McVeigh destroyed the Alfred P. Murrah Building with a truck bomb, killing 168 and injuring nearly 700.

The union that represents the Federal Protective Service tasked with guarding federal buildings recently reiterated to Federal Daily, an 1105 Government Information Group site, its continuing concerns about FPS’s less-than-optimal security software and other potential security weaknesses.

Since that time, the leadership of the 150,000-strong National Treasury Employees Union—pointing to recent tragic attacks on federal buildings—also has complained, telling Congress that FPS relies far too much on private contractors armed with too little training, too little funding, and too little proper management to actually carry out its mission.

“Attacks on Internal Revenue Service offices in Austin, Texas, and shootings at a Las Vegas federal courthouse and at the Pentagon have once again raised concerns about the vulnerability of federal buildings and the safety and security of federal employees who work in them around the country,” NTEU President Colleen Kelley told the House Homeland Security Committee on April 15. “These attacks, in which two federal employees were killed and several others seriously injured, serve as a grim reminder of the great risk that federal employees face each and every day in service to this country.”


Read more: http://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2010/04/20/federal-protective-service.aspx



Lead in: Too much contracting, too little funding for security could lead to another devastating attack reminiscent of Oklahoma City

For more, go to: www.nteu.org.

About the Author

Federal Daily, an 1105 Government Information Group site, features news and resources for federal and postal employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, they have a point, I guess.
Austin probably isn't a great example to use, though. Not much to be done about crazy people flying planes into buildings. Anti-aircraft guns on the roof of every federal building? Not happening.

Their complaint, which is fair, is that the huge increase in private security contractors at federal installations since 9-11 has been accompanied by a decrease in the folks that are supposed to be supervising them. They are overworked and unable to cope with the job. We should do something about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downwinder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 07:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Look at how easy it was to get into the Federal Building in NOLA. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Synicus Maximus Donating Member (828 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-20-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. But McVeigh was never in the building the bomb was exploded
outside of the building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC