Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

N.Korea Gets New Premier

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:12 PM
Original message
N.Korea Gets New Premier
Source: Chosum Ilbo (a S. Korean daily)

North Korea in a rare extra parliamentary session on Monday promoted leader Kim Jong-il's brother-in-law Jang Song-taek to vice chairman of the National Defense Commission, the top policy-making body. Prime Minister Kim Yong-il was fired over a botched currency reform late last year and replaced with Choe Yong-rim (81), the chief secretary of the Pyongyang branch of the Workers Party.

Kim Jong-il made a rare appearance at the session and personally proposed Jang's appointment.

Vice premiers Kwak Bum-ki, Oh Soo-yong and Pak Myong-sun were also fired and replaced with Kang Neung-soo, a Workers Party director, Kim Rak-hee, a party secretary in South Hwanghae Province, Ri Tae-nam, a party secretary from South Pyongan Province, and Jeon Ha-chol, a former politburo member.

The minister of machinery production Cho Byong-joo and minister of the electronics industry Han Kwang-bok were also appointed as vice premiers

Read more: http://english.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2010/06/08/2010060800633.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is like I, Claudius.
And somewhat like Republican Primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Or the Klingon high command
In any case, I suppose Li'l Kim's war threats finally alarmed the rest of them sufficiently to get rid of him at last.

The new guy will probably not be much of an improvement, but if that region avoids war, it will be worth it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's leadership that combines the WORST of communist absolutism and inherited monarchy. Ugh! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Kim Jong-il is still in charge; Kim Yong-il is someone else. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Everyone is either named Rhee or Kim
It makes keeping track of the politicians difficult sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Rhee or Kim are last names -
They're all either related or from the same regions in NK.
Chances are, they're all within a couple generations of each other and from the same region.

Haele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Well, "family" names
Not "last" in the temporal or spatial sense...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Oh, phooey, my bad
From here they all sound alike.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. You are correct
The title is somewhat misleading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kim must not be healthy
Succesion is being determined.

People mistake this infrastucture, much like any other dictatorship, the people right under the dictator are actually more important than the dictator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. He's been circling the drain for a few years now, yeah
One of his sons has been being moved into position for the last several months, but they're so secretive over there that the guy's face has yet to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Kim is a figurehead
he is the decider in disputes amongst the people below him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ahh, the utopia that is North Korea...
How are those "Workers Party" policies going? I wonder if the workers feel well represented by their leaders?

North Korea is just another tired, failed Marxist experiment showing the rest of the world exactly what not to do.

When will people finally learn that command economies will simply never work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teknomanzer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. The lessons of the last century...
1. Command economies do not work as they are stagnant and cannot keep pace with changing market demands.

2. Laissez Faire economies do not work as they allow the consolodation of wealth into the hands of a few elites who are then able to manipulate the market to their advantage.

3. Peanut butter and chocolate really are great together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Socialist market economy is best.
That's the lesson.

Socialism should take account of people's needs and wants and there must be a signal for these needs and wants - that's where market comes in. But "demand" is unjust when wealth is concentrated is few hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teknomanzer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I would tweak that a bit...
A socialist government should be concerned with people's needs and a well regulated market economy should respond to people's wants.

Health care should not be in the hands of the private sector. Televisions should not be manufactured by state owned industries - co-ops perhaps but not the government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Cooperatives vs. state-owned enterprises.
There can be a fine line between various forms of ownership. In fact, "state-owned enterprises" can be every bit as capitalist as a private firm in that a few may reap the profits, and they may act on the market as competing capitals.

I think there is a lot of value in macroeconomic planning. It served socialist economies very well up to a certain point. It worked well during the period of capital-intensive reconstruction, but didn't work well later on... the question is why this was the case. I believe that it had more to do with political questions than pure economic questions. There is no reason that planning cannot serve people's needs. FDR instituted much economic planning, with great benefit, for instance. "Command economy" is a boogey man of the neoliberals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Nonsense, McCarthyite drivel...
There is no "Marxist" government in N. Korea. You can get into big trouble if you get caught with a book by Karl Marx or Lenin in N. Korea. "Juche" is at its core anti-Marxist, anti-internationalist.

N. Korea is no more representative of "socialism" than Nazi Germany was representative of "capitalism."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tiberius Donating Member (798 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 10:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. Thank you
I'm no fan of socialism -- but to equate the barbaric, savage regime of North Korea with socialism is just inaccurate. It hasn't been anything even remotely close to socialism in probably 50 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iandhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-07-10 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kim Yong-il was fired
Where will he be disappeared to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old Troop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-08-10 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dammit - they've lost the revolutionary fervor of the Great Leader
Story of Kim Il Sung
Pyongyang, June 7 (KCNA) -- Early on the morning of April 15, Juche 43 (1954), President Kim Il Sung left for Samjong-ri of Junghwa County, South Phyongan Province (then).

During his field guidance over the ri, the President learned that there was a spring in its vicinity and turned his steps toward it.

The officials of the rural community told him the spring was in muddy land. But the President did not hesitate to go to it, saying that he had covered rugged paths during the anti-Japanese armed struggle.

Arriving at the spot, he advised the officials to use the spring water for fish breeding and fully supply fish to the people of the ri.

That day was his birthday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC