Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. denies asking other nations to attack Wikileaks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:29 PM
Original message
U.S. denies asking other nations to attack Wikileaks
Source: CNET News

The U.S. State Department has denied asking other countries to open criminal investigations into Wikileaks co-founder Julian Assange.

"We have not approached any country to encourage them to do anything," Philip Crowley, assistant secretary of state, told CNET. The main Wikileaks.org Web site is located in Sweden.

Crowley acknowledged that U.S. officials have "had conversations with a variety of countries" about Wikileaks, but said those discussions were limited to expressing "concerns that we've had."

That conflicts with a report earlier this week on TheDailyBeast.com, which said the Obama administration is "pressing Britain, Germany, Australia, and other allied Western governments to consider opening criminal investigations" into Assange and to limit his ability to travel freely.

Read more: http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20013507-281.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. those discussions were limited to expressing "concerns that we've had."
"And if they happen to take action based on our "concerns" (including veiled threats), its no fault of ours."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dadzilla Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. "denied asking other countries"
Officially that is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. A VERY misleading...
subject line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Per LBN rules the OP used the title of the article linked to in the subject line n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SDuderstadt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sorry...
I was aiming that at CNET, but did so clumsily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. It's ok, I thought that's where you were coming from and didn't take it any other way n/t
Edited on Fri Aug-13-10 01:31 AM by Turborama
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. Translation: US did ask other nations to attack Wikileaks
The Ministry of Love is the Ministry of Torture. The Ministry of Truth is the Ministry of Lies.

We are living in Oceania!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-12-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. C'mon, folks
Edited on Thu Aug-12-10 11:10 PM by DFLforever
What do you expect them to say... we're using all the influence we have to shut this guy down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKDem08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. um...didn't candidate Obama say something about transparency?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Transparency is good,
Well maybe not in foreign affairs.

But it's no substitute for an ability to read between the lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. hmmm....... nah, we wouldn't do that ...
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BadgerKid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-13-10 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. Original article only mentions "officials"
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-08-10/a-western-crackdown-on-wikileaks/

Why the f* would "officials" talk to TheDailyBeast? Something doesn't smell right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC