Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lawyers: Gay marriage ban aim was to deny stature

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 08:51 PM
Original message
Lawyers: Gay marriage ban aim was to deny stature
Source: Associated Press

Lawyers: Gay marriage ban aim was to deny stature
By Associated Press

Lawyers for the city of San Francisco are firing back at gay marriage opponents who want an appeals court to overturn the judge who struck down California's voter-approved ban on same-sex unions.

In a brief filed with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Monday, the city attorney's office said Proposition 8's sponsors failed to make a sound case for preventing homosexuals from marrying while leaving intact their rights to raise children.

The lawyers argued that the 2008 ban's only purpose was to deny same-sex couples of "the honored stature" of marriage and to avoid having anyone "view gay relationships as 'OK.'"

Read more: http://www.salon.com/wires/us/2010/10/18/D9IUF40G0_us_gay_marriage_trial/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Proletariatprincess Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-18-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. Makes me proud to be a San Franciscian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnypneumatic Donating Member (461 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. hey Associated Press, update your style guide
we are "gay people", not "homosexuals"
"homosexual" is an offensive clinical term, dating back to the time when the being gay was considered a mental illness.
that was eliminated in 1973...
I am a gay human being, I am not "a homosexual" thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. it's really that simple. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L.Torsalo Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. It is obvious;
to deny a group rights is to deny them the status and stature that such accreditation brings. It's called discrimination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-19-10 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Gay judges cannot decide cases involving gays? Fine--if hetero judges cannot decide cases involving
heteros. Now, THAT would create jobs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC