Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Potash Co. of America retirees losing insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:12 AM
Original message
Potash Co. of America retirees losing insurance
Source: Associated Press

Potash Co. of America retirees losing insurance

Posted at: 02/20/2011 5:05 PM
By: The Associated Press

CARLSBAD, N.M. (AP) - Potash Company of America retirees will lose their health insurance as of April 1.

A court-appointed seven-member board of trustees that oversees the PCA Retiree Trust and Double D Insurance says $7.5 million put in trust for retirees in 1993 has been spent.

Trustee George Bartlett says the high cost of health care for the aging retirees and widows of retirees, coupled with the banking crisis of 2008 and 2009, took a financial toll on the trust.

The trust office will close March 31. Trustees urge retirees to submit medical claims as soon as possible so payments can be made before the office closes.

Read more: http://www.kob.com/article/stories/S1982971.shtml?cat=504
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. God, I'm a retiree and this is my worst fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. Wonder what size fund needs to get wiped out to get a lot of people mad.
Edited on Mon Feb-21-11 11:03 AM by jtuck004

Would have been more trouble if it was their pensions...

The government can loan $23 trillion to banks, then pay them hundreds of billions in bailout funds as interest. This little thing was $7.5 million. And just couldn't save it, huh?

Now a bunch of 65, 70, 75 years olds out of care? Dependent on Medicare only now, I think.

More of the story at http://www.currentargus.com/ci_17434842

Prior theft of money, then this little fund was established for about 740 employees. Now down to 140. Those with assets will have to
buy Medicare D somewhere - according to one of the pensions folks about $100/mo. Which does no good if you have not an extra $100/mo.

That's sad, but at least they have Medicare if they are at retirement age and had a income for social security, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northoftheborder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. This is the beginning of the end of employee insurance.
Maybe an opportunity to at least expand Medicare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. sounds like they speculated with the people's
money. They should be charged with fiduciary crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. but, EVERYONE did that.
Even the brilliant geniuses at Harvard speculated, and they lost several billions in the process.

There are hundreds of towns and municipalities that were given "sound advice" on what to do with pension, rainy day, and infrastructure moneys. And they followed that advise. Now those funds are empty. (while the wall street experts who convinced them to take their advice are still reaping, nay, RAPING America for hundreds of billions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. we need to clen that cesspool. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. that we do. and soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good! That'll teach 'em to be part of the other 98%!
If there are any pennies left, they should send them to national elected Democrats as a thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
on point Donating Member (613 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. Many funds were said to be 'overpaying' in good times, so redirected payments to execs and dividends
Edited on Mon Feb-21-11 10:41 AM by on point
This could have been seen a mile off. I know I saw it coming. When times were good, stocks booming etc, many trust funds were told to use high rates of return as 'normal' and so reduced their contributions. The money then went in many many cases to bonuses for the executive staff - 'look how they saved the company money' it was said at the time!; or were paid as dividends to stockholders. These never should have been paid and the funds should have stayed the course so that they had enough money.

Frankly, I think this constitutes fraud. They promised employees the money as part of their labor contract and didn't put aside enough money.

I also wonder about these companies, like GM, that declared bankruptcy so they wouldn't have to make good on employee contracts, but yet didn't see fit to cancel exec multi-million dollar pension schemes and benefits.

Another case of fraud I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ljm2002 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Apparently contracts with labor aren't worth the paper they're written on...
...while contracts with executives and banksters and high-flying hedge fund managers are sacred and cannot be broken, ever.

That is the current state of contract law in this country, and it s.t.i.n.k.s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raouldukelives Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. + 10000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That's why I left the corporate world decades ago. . .
They were using pension funds to pay for R&D and corporate bonuses back in the '70s. Anyone who believed they would honor their commitments when times grew tough (or even through good times, once they realized what a cash cow they had on hand) merely lived a pipe dream. The numbers were always against us -- too many of us counting on the integrity of a few of them. It was never going to end satisfactorily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalEsto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Trust" is an oxymoron
It's obvious that you can't trust a company that creates a trust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-21-11 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
11. Wall Street and this pension's managers get a free pass...
Again, while retirees pay the price.
These trustees should be held accountable, but they won't.
Shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC