Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bill Would Make Some Airport Screening Sexual Assault

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
The abyss Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 07:49 PM
Original message
Bill Would Make Some Airport Screening Sexual Assault
Source: wmur: New Hampshire


CONCORD, N.H. -- Lawmakers and residents engaged in heated debate Tuesday over a bill that would make random airport security pat-downs and body scans criminal in New Hampshire.


The bill (HB628-FN) "makes the touching or viewing with a technological device of a person’s breasts or genitals by a government security agent without probable cause a sexual assault," according to the introductory text of the bill.


Read more: http://www.wmur.com/r/27035604/detail.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mojorabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The abyss Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. At least it's a start...
Frankly - I want to see the entire homeland insecurity apparatus ground to dust. But that isn't too likely anytime soon :(

Start small and go-for-it.

Maybe the granite state will start a trend! "Live Free or Die".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Strangers touching me like that would give me a panic attack.
I'm a hard exam for a nice MD. I don't want to be touched for no reason. Nor do I want to be irradiated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sound like a good idea to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apnu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. The way the quote is structured it suggests that government security agent's can't look at porn.
"... viewing with a technological device ..." (that's a computer or smart phone).

Not trying to get into a debate on porn, just pointing out a badly worded sentence that can be applied beyond (private home activity) its intended scope (public TSA patdowns and scans).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyHawkAZ Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Relevant text...
"(d) When the person, acting in his or her role as a security agent of the federal, state, or local government, touches the genitals or breasts of any other person or touches or views with any technological device the genitals or breasts of any other person without probable cause for such touching or viewing. For purposes of this subparagraph, the following shall not constitute probable cause: discussing or possessing a copy of the Constitution, discussing the security apparatus of an airport, being on the premises of an airport, possessing an airplane ticket or any other type of ticket for access to mass transportation, driving a motor vehicle on a public way, or ownership of firearms."

I think viewing porn on their break, while kinda icky to think about, would not fall under them acting in their official capacity, and their at-home activities are not covered by the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sounds good to me....K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LadyHawkAZ Donating Member (800 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. YES! YES! YES! YES! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-01-11 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Pfft. Probable cause is so antiquated.
Edited on Tue Mar-01-11 09:51 PM by laconicsax
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
10. Go for it New Hampsire! PS I love your "Live Free Or Die" license plates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. I would like to see a BIG rebellion about these scans, to at least get the freak'n TSA to...
...modify the searches.

Yup...right now it feels kinda like rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. How 'bout a bill recognizing it's a violation of the Fourth Amdt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Finally.
Edited on Wed Mar-02-11 10:41 AM by sarcasmo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirkGently Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-02-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
14. Worth a shot. The TSA is much weaker on "probable cause" than it assumes.
Edited on Wed Mar-02-11 05:43 PM by DirkGently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC