|
Edited on Fri Mar-04-11 05:05 PM by happyslug
The one who is called in to show that what someone saw was NOT a Cougar. About ten years ago a Cougar was reported at Coopers-dale homes of Johnstown (Cooperate Homes is a Public Housing Project of the City of Johnstown right at the end of the Conemaugh River Gap, the deepest river gap in the East, which brings Coopers-dale homes right next to Allegheny Mountain which is nothing by trees and hillsides for miles).
Thus reliable Cougar sightings have been seem but it is easy to make an mistake, for example I once saw a cat sitting in a ball field by the local bike trail as it enters the little Conemaugh river Gap. At first glance I thought it was bigger then a normal cat, assuming it was a bobcat or a Lynx. As I went closer, it moved and once it moved you could tell it was just a regular house cat. Mistakes like that happens.
On the other hand, we have had reports of Eastern Cougars for decades. Most of the Appalachian mountains were clear cut about 1900 so where a cougar could live was reduced drastically just before the ban on Hunting any "game" animal without a license became effective. Cougars take decades to increase to a level where they are over populated, and thus no such overpopulation has occurred in the East. Cougars can start to have kittens at age 2, but most kittens die before their are one year old. Many other die as they separate from their mother at about age 2. Thus replacement levels tend to be slow, taking decades to recover. In fact hunting seems to increase the number of cougars (basically, cougars are territorial, one cougar to a territory, male and female territories overlap but not two males or two females). Hunting knocks of Cougars, thus opening up their territories to other cougars. Constant killing of Cougars keep the territory open so you end up with more cougar per square mile when cougars are hunter, then in areas where Cougars are NOT hunted and thus establish territories and drive "excess" cougars away.
Just a comment that non-hunted cougars are less tolerate of other Cougars then Cougars in areas where it is legal to hunt Cougars. In the east you have no hunting of Cougars, and thus incentives for Cougars to have large ranges.
The fact that a Cougar only lives about 20 years and given the two year cycle most Cougar females goes through when they have kittens, that leaves 10 cougars per female as the maximum a female can produce. Given 1/2 are going to be male, that female cougar produced only five new female in her life time. If you accept that one of those female will replace their mother, every ten years you will see an increase of only 300% (Four females instead of one female). That sounds like a lot, but given the need to learn to hunt in new territories, not enough for a rapid explosion in population (Deer also live about ten years and produce ten offspring, half of them males, but Deer are NOT hunting its food, it is grazing, graze is not only more common then meat, it is also safer for most animals to obtain, thus less deaths and injuries when obtaining graze then meat).
Wolves, are different then Cats, in that Wolves, like dogs, are omnivores i.e. can live off plant AND animal food. Cats MUST have meat, thus Cats MUST hunt. Wolves only have to hunt if no other food is available, thus can decline hunts at times when Cougars MUST hunt. This gives wolves a little better ability to survive and reproduce (That Wolves are pack animals are another factor in their favor). Bears and Coyotes are also omnivores, and thus can survive and opt out of hunting if the risks are to high. Cougars do NOT have that option. Thus reproduction tends to be much slower among the Cats then Wolves, Coyotes and even bears.
Another factor is since 1900 and the last true clean cut in the Eastern US, the trees have been left to grow back. By the 1930s enough had grown back to make the eastern us a upland game bird paradise. By the 1950s that had ended and you had second growth trees with plenty of food for White Tail Deer, and thus you had a white tail deer paradise. By the 1980s that white tail deer paradise was dieing out, being replaced by mature woods and Turkeys (Pennsylvania hunters have complained of the drop in White Tail Deer since the 1970s when Deer population peaked and started to drop in rural Pennsylvania, while booming in urban and suburban Pennsylvania). This all reflects the clean cutting of the Woods about 1900s and the slow regrowth of the forests since that time (Most Pennsylvania Woods are in or are entering the Mature forest stage, a bad stage for deer).
Now, if we assume minimal number of Cougars in 1900, the numbers would have increased to about 1970, then start to drop as the forest gets to mature for deer. The Scary part is Cougars may have held their own since 1970, reducing the number of deer in Rural Pennsylvania leading to the drop in deer in Rural Pennsylvania (A find the State Game Commission does not want to find, for the Game Commission is under attack now for the drop in deer in Rural Pennsylvania).
Just pointing out some facts that can be involved in under-counting and non-counting Cougars in the American East. In many ways, the Rural East was not cougar territory till about WWII (As late as the 1970s you could still see the abandon homes of rural Pennsylvania workers who had to abandon those homes in the 1930 to look for work elsewhere. These were subsistence farms i.e. farms worked to feed the family, while the men (and women) went to larger farms to work (or other rural employment centers, Pennsylvania had a huge rural population tied in with industry located in rural Pennsylvania).
Thus it is possible for Cougars to exists in the Eastern US, but the numbers were low in 1900 and could not really recover till the 1950s (When second growth forest became the norm in Pennsylvania). By the 1980s when Mature Forest became the norm, it became harder for Cougars to find their meals AND they had to change tactics do to the change in the forest (Not easy, when you learn to hunt from your mother). Adjustments take time, and with the growth of the forest more adjustments had to be made then was normal.
My point is the clean cutting of the forest, the spread of second growth forests and then the maturating of those forests, lead to differed patterns of what walked those woods. Each required different hunting techniques that had to be learn on the job as oppose to from each cougar's mothers (Do to the change in forests over the last 100 years). This all kept the lions numbers down, but also permitted them to survive. Only time and the acceptance that such a clean cutting is NOT good for the state as a whole will permit Cougars to make the required adjustments and even that will take time.
|