Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Two injured in HMS Astute nuclear submarine shooting

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bosonic Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:39 AM
Original message
Two injured in HMS Astute nuclear submarine shooting
Source: BBC

A man has been arrested after a shooting on board the nuclear submarine HMS Astute left two people injured.

Police were called at 1212 BST to Southampton docks where the vessel has been berthed since Wednesday as part of a five-day visit.

An eyewitness said he saw one person being stretchered off the submarine into a waiting ambulance.

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-13014640
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. "Some Things In Here…Don’t React Too Well To Bullets…Ryan."
Hope everyone is ok..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Maybe the men just wanted to stay in Tahiti...
"The women are handsome ... and have sufficient delicacy to make them admired and beloved - The chiefs have taken such a liking to our people that they have rather encouraged their stay among them than otherwise, and even made promises of large possessions. Under these and many other attendant circumstances equally desirable it is therefore now not to be wondered at ... that a set of sailors led by officers and void of connections ... should be governed by such powerful inducement ... to fix themselves in the midst of plenty in the finest island in the world where they need not labour, and where the alurements of disipation are more than equal to anything that can be conceived."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. So many great lines in that movie!
I have yet to tire of re-watching it!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. AtheistCrusader
AtheistCrusader

The hunt for red october;).. I know that book, and movie, as I have read at least 4 copys of the book to death..

And Sean Connery do a hell of a job playing Ramus in that movie... The movie could not be that great, if he had not been in it.. As i don't really like the actor playing Ryan... I know a better actor to that job... But the movie was allmoust as good as the book...

Diclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Update - one has died, other in 'life-threatening condition'
same link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nalnn Donating Member (528 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Anyone remember
A while back (a few years ago) a girl serving on an HMS Cruiser was arrested for Herorine smuggling. Apparently she had been at it for a while and had it built up to where she could move several kilos at a time onboard. She went to jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is a warship!
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuart G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. One Dead After Shooting on UK Nuclear Sub
Edited on Fri Apr-08-11 06:53 PM by Stuart G
Source: AP, Yahoo News..

LONDON – A British sailor aboard a nuclear-powered submarine apparently shot dead a crew member and seriously wounded another Friday while the vessel was on a goodwill visit to an English port, officials said.

The suspect was overpowered by colleagues and visiting dignitaries aboard HMS Astute and arrested on suspicion of murder.

Police and military officials said the incident was not related to terrorism, but offered few details about what may have prompted a sailor to open fire during a tour of the submarine by local officials, including the mayor of Southampton, in southern England.


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110408/ap_on_re_eu/eu_britain_submarine



You know....everyone needs to have a gun, yeppp...everyone, needs one...everywhere.............
and all the time...of course...

:bounce: :bounce: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I'm shocked there was a firearm on board
I never served, but I thought that since the days of yore only the captain kept a sidearm locked up in his quarters (for obvious reasons). Even for security, guns are completely needless on a ship, since any criminals onboard are going nowhere and can be easily subdued and incarcerated. The last thing thay need on a ship is a shoot out.

Americans may hate gun control, but the Navy, both here and abroad, are firm on their rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. There is plenty of armed security keeping an eye on those nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. I don't understand though
Protecting the nulear missiles from who? The crew? Hidden terrorists on board who will steal one and make off in a life raft? it's a warship in communication with the fleet. Even a Somali pirate would head the other direction for easier prey.

It's my belief rifle calibre weapons on a warship are useless for anything but mutiny, but like I said, I was never in the service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. As already established, there are no nuclear missiles involved here
It's a nuclear powered submarine, not a nuclear-armed one. However, a nuclear reactor is still the kind of thing that needs guarding when you are in port. Especially when you're having an open day, and inviting members of the public on board. So they had armed guards, of whom the killer was one (perhaps he was the only one - I don't know).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Well that would make more sense
They probably lock up weapons when underway, but I can see how a couple assault rifles might be needed in port.
I just thought it would appear ludicris to see seamen wending their way through a submarine a thousand miles from anywhere with a firearm. If a crew of a nuclear submarine ends up in hand to hand combat with an enemy, they probably already lost the battle.

Even so, a nucleat reactor is not a weapon. The fuel, though marketable, isn't weapons grade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Killing an active duty officer on a nuclear weapons platform
Edited on Fri Apr-08-11 07:55 PM by BrightKnight
is treason regardless of the "motive."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Not nuclear weapons - nuclear propulsion, with conventional armaments
and since it's being handled by Hampshire police, rather than Ministry of Defence police, and 'murder' is the grounds for arrest, I don't think they agree with you about 'treason'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. They are keeping it cool. How a nuclear powered sub is armed is not public
Edited on Fri Apr-08-11 09:32 PM by BrightKnight
information. I believe that we are to assume that any nuclear submarine has nukes at all times (regardless of how it is armed). Nuclear subs were not designed to clean swimming pools. I am guessing that you did not grow up during the Cold War.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. "assume that any nuclear submarine has nukes at all times"?
Wayyyyyy off.

Most nukes are on land, under lock and key, and heavily tracked, not sitting on a boat or ship where they could be lost if the ship goes down.... they're too expensive to risk them that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I think British nukes are all submarine based these days. n/t
I suppose some might be stored on land, but all the launchers are sub based.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. I did grow up during the Cold War, and I guess you don't know much about submarines
Edited on Sat Apr-09-11 04:20 AM by muriel_volestrangler
or the British nuclear deterrent.

The only British nuclear weapons are the Trident submarine-launched ballistic missiles. This is not a Trident submarine. It cannot launch ballistic missiles. It is a hunter-killer submarine, designed to find and destroy ballistic missile submarines, or do general submarine duties (eg a hunter-killer submarine sank the General Belgrano in the Falklands conflict).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. It's a Tomahawk thrower and I am not losing sleep. - n/t
Edited on Sat Apr-09-11 10:36 PM by BrightKnight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. Exactly - the British have no nuclear warheads for Tomahawks
You don't need to lose sleep about it, just check the situation before you post, that's all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Tough to plan a getaway right chap?
WOw that is scary

Motive is probably money or sex (not with each other).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corruption Winz Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Killing someone on a goodwill trip isn't ironic at all....
And that wasn't sarcasm, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leonardo Da Biker Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Of course there are guns
in the case of submarines because of the nukes on board. I don't know how they do things in the British navy but in the U.S. navy there are shotgun toting guards on the subs. When I was at Pearl Harbor I could board any ship I had friends on. Just walk right up the gang plank, show my I.D. to the officer on deck and ask to board, no problem on the smaller ships. Bigger ships like aircraft carriers or frigates had a marine guard detachment on board. I couldn't just board and go on my merry way. Whatever sailor I was visiting would have to come up on deck and sign me in. Not the subs. Nobody goes on them but their own crews, no visitors. When passing moored subs at the sub base you gave that gang plank a wide berth. I had no doubts anyone who didn't have any business there trying to get on a sub would be immediately blasted overboard. They are not kidding around.
Until we evolve to the point when we don't need nukes there will be guards with guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. "Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC