Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Donald Molloy Blocks Deal To Lift Wolves' Endangered Species Protections In 2 States

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:46 AM
Original message
Judge Donald Molloy Blocks Deal To Lift Wolves' Endangered Species Protections In 2 States
Source: Huffington Post

Judge Donald Molloy Blocks Deal To Lift Wolves' Endangered Species Protections In 2 States

BOISE, Idaho -- A federal judge has denied a proposed settlement agreement between the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and 10 conservation groups that would have lifted endangered species protections for wolves in Montana and Idaho.

U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in Missoula on Saturday rejected the agreement that could have led to public hunting of some 1,300 wolves in the two states.

In the 24-page decision, Molloy cited the court's lack of authority to put part of an endangered species population under state management and expose that population to hunting, noting "Congress has clearly determined that animals on the ESA must be protected as such," and the court couldn't "exercise its discretion to allow what Congress forbids."

He also said he couldn't approve the settlement proposed in March because not all the parties involved in the case agreed with it. Part of the argument for the settlement was that it could end litigation, but Molloy noted that was unlikely given the opposition by some to the proposed settlement.


Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/04/09/judge-donald-molloy-endangered-wolves_n_847104.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is a complex issue.
Conservation groups supported the settlement that Molloy struck down, because what will happen now will be worse. However, Molloy's decision was probably legally correct and maybe better overall for the Endangered Species Act.

The problem is that now the 'wolf rider' in the budget bill will probably go through (it would have been irrelevant with this settlement, I gather), and that will be a worse situation than what was negotiated in the settlement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Key point
The agreed to settlement was reasonable and supported my most of the participants. This decision will force things into a binary situation and most likely conservationist will lose ground in the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC