Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pastor Terry Jones to appeal ruling in Dearborn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 09:50 AM
Original message
Pastor Terry Jones to appeal ruling in Dearborn
Source: Detroit Free Press

The Rev. Terry Jones is to file an appeal today in Wayne County Circuit Court over a Dearborn court's decision against him last week that thwarted his plans to protest outside the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, an attorney said Monday.

"It was a clear violation of the First Amendment's right to free speech," said Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel for the Ann Arbor-based Thomas More Law Center, which is representing Jones.


Read more: http://www.freep.com/article/20110426/NEWS05/104260398/1001/news?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+freepLocalNews+%28freep.com+|+Local+News%29



I don't support Jones' views in the slightest, and I think his legal representatives are politically-driven polarizing bigots.

Having said that, I support this appeal because the original judges ruling is a free speech disaster that basically gives mobs who threaten violence the power and right to limit the free speech of others.

I fully expect the appeal to be successful all the way to the SC, if necessary. I hope the ACLU gets directly involved.

- B
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, Jones is a dirtbag
This is a matter of free speech and he should be allowed to protest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. We desperately need to avoid giving legitimacy to the Hecklers Veto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cleanhippie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. agreed. there is no free speech unless we protect speech we disagree with.
Jones is scum, IMO, but he has the same rights as we all do to protest whatever he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. True
But, the reality is that the community also has the right to protect its citizens from any possible dangers that might be the results of that protest.

From what I read he was just being asked for a peace bond.

Peace Bond
It is a court order where it requires a person to deposit a sum of money as bond that would guarantee that he/she would not bother or threaten the other person and will not commit a breach of peace. If the same person is found to bother or violate such agreement, the bond will be forfeited and it can lead to arrest as well.


It's like insurance...if there isn't any trouble, then you get your money back.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #6
11. You wrote:
the reality is that the community also has the right to protect its citizens from any possible dangers that might be the results of that protest.

The intent of the ruling was not to protect bystanding citizens from danger.

The only people purported to be in danger were Terry Jones and any protesters who joined him who the court felt might be in danger from illegal violent acts committed by people opposed to their views.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Cool. So, we can apply it to voting too, amIrite?
If your candidate wins the election, you get your money back....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. So if someone objects to what you want to say enough to smack you down
Only a person with the money has the right to speak?

The Supreme court has been quite negative about this theory.

Demonstrating is not bothering or threatening. What the county did was to make it illegal for this guy to protest. Worse, it arrested him before he even did anything. This is the most serious type of anti-free speech activity, and the SC will not tolerate this.

Personally I think Jones should have his ass kicked - there's something about demonstrating outside of places of worship that generally sparks my NO-meter - but it is essential for the rule of law that it not be the government which kicks his ass.

Bragi is quite right that such theories and actions were used to try to suppress the southern civil rights effort. And this is why I cannot believe this is happening now, after all this should have been settled.

I might not like it, but I'll defend anyone's right to picket or demonstrate peacefully. And no one should be arrested for speech or expressive conduct that has not been offered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dogtown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Complete agreement.
Still, I hope the appeal costs those jerks a fortune.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Probably won't cost Jones anything
I think Jones is basically a pauper. However, the legal foundation that is backing the appeal is a right wing anti-Sharia group that is probably well-funded by the Kochs or some other dubious right wing source.

I figure their money will be happily spent in exchange for all the PR their cause will get as a result of the appeal of this court ruling.

That's why I want to see the ACLU get involved. They can focus on the rights issue without defending and promoting the views being expressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Free speech...Yeah!
But, IMHO... because of what we know about the situation...

this is yelling "FIRE!" in a crowded theatre.

Pastor Jones can protest in a less volatile area.... like the Westboro protesters. His protest is not the issue... the issue is location.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. This is nothing like yelling fire in a crowded theatre
This is someone whose right to free speech was curtailed by a judge because it was felt that people opposed to his views would engage in illegal violence.

In short, Jones' right to free speech is being curtailed by people threatening violence against him.

If this ruling had stood in the 1960s, then violent racists would have been allowed to silence Martin Luther King.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Ah, "Free-speech Zones", amIrite?
Edited on Tue Apr-26-11 11:46 AM by PavePusher
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nykym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. So let him speak and hold his protest
No bullhorns or microphones, no shouting, voice levels must be kept to a minimum and will be monitored, no signs larger than 8.5" x 11". no blockage of traffic patterns, no littering etc. etc. Make it as difficult for him to carry out his protest as Bush did to protesters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. So Bush should be our standard for free speech tolerance?
I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
14. So how much does he want for damages?
I'm sure he's in it for the money.

So the city didn't grant him permission to cause a traffic jam on a road with five churches on Good Friday? The city offered alternative sites, but not in a spot that would block traffic.

And now he's represented by Tom Monaghan's (Domino Pizza) Thomas More Law Center, a rabid Catholic/Christian source of lawsuits.

http://www.thomasmore.org/default-sb_thomasmore.html?607348584

I'm sure Monaghan, the lawyers, and Terry Jones will make out like bandits on this deal. Hell, maybe Jones will be able to afford a suit to wear to court. Or at least a leather jacket without all the scuff marks.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bragi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. What makes you think $ motivate him?
Jones is virtually a pauper and there is no evidence I can see that he is motivated by money. He seems to be motivated simply by his Bible-based extreme Xian religious views.

Thanks for the info on the Thomas More Centre. I agree it looks to be a radical Xian front group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-26-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I hope there's no big money involved
the city doesn't need the expense. The cop overtime etc from his visit last week was pegged around 50k.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC