Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House votes to restrict unions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
SecularMotion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:28 AM
Original message
House votes to restrict unions
Source: Boston Globe

House lawmakers voted overwhelmingly last night to strip police officers, teachers, and other municipal employees of most of their rights to bargain over health care, saying the change would save millions of dollars for financially strapped cities and towns.

The 111-to-42 vote followed tougher measures to broadly eliminate collective bargaining rights for public employees in Ohio, Wisconsin, and other states. But unlike those efforts, the push in Massachusetts was led by Democrats who have traditionally stood with labor to oppose any reduction in workers’ rights.

Unions fought hard to stop the bill, launching a radio ad that assailed the plan and warning legislators that if they voted for the measure, they could lose their union backing in the next election. After the vote, labor leaders accused House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo and other Democrats of turning their backs on public employees.

“It’s pretty stunning,’’ said Robert J. Haynes, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO. “These are the same Democrats that all these labor unions elected. The same Democrats who we contributed to in their campaigns. The same Democrats who tell us over and over again that they’re with us, that they believe in collective bargaining, that they believe in unions. . . . It’s a done deal for our relationship with the people inside that chamber.’’

Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/politics/articles/2011/04/27/house_votes_to_limit_bargaining_on_health_care/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
inademv Donating Member (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't Mass. the home of the bluedogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. They don't watch Maddow, do they?
They didn't see her funding charts. This is simply insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. No it is not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
53. fuck the dems in Mass. Fuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #53
58. What you and your weiner dog said!
I have a half-beagle, half-chihuahua who wants a play date!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. bring him on! I can only imagine he looks awesome. :-D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. His name is Chalupa
and he's a disgusting, horny little devil about nine months old. But he's a gregarious go-getter and all about the love!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. At some point, labor just has to say enough and support other parties.
We have a country where the only ideas that gain traction come from corporate serving think-tanks.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. I think that we need to have massive nation wide/crippling strikes.
Of course I would like to 'to strike' the baggies and idjits..and set up that those who don't support unions for police and firemen don't get any service, let their damn house burn down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
24601 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
57. What a stupid idea - agree with me or I'll break my oath of office.
It with be quickest way to kill off any remaining unions.

Air Traffic Controllers - Support my union or I'll crash planes
NFL Players - Support my union or I'll fumble on purpose
Nurses - Support my union or I'll give you a fatal dose of medicine
Bus Drivers - Support my union or I'll drive us off a cliff
Teachers - Support my union or I'll turn your kids into morons - Oops, too late on that one


Sure - piss off the overwhelming majority of the population and end up with a constitutional amendment outlawing all unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #57
62. Which of course isn't what was said at all
But then, you jolly well knew that, didn't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. at some point Labor has to realize that the electoral system has failed us
-totally, and is not a path to revitalization - or even to continued existence at the current life-support levels. I saw Labor's marriage to the Ds recently referred to as "rearranging the deck chairs on the titanic." I'd liken it more to fighting over the leaky and rotting lifeboats.

The political path has failed Labor as it has failed unorganized workers in this country. Time to take another path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pasto76 Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #10
29. most union folk I work with vote republican
which is stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why would Mass Dems commit mass suicide?
Are you sure this isn't an Onion article?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. WTF??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
27. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, we American citizens are losing most of our basic freedoms
and most people only shrug.

Why do state governments thinks it's a ok to take away our right to form unions? Even the UN considers the right to collective bargaining a basic requirement of civil freedoms.

I've seen this act before, in Pinochet's Chile. Pinochet rounded up all the union members, locked them away and eventually killed most of them, with the advice of Milton Friedman. Most Banana Republics attack their Unions 1st before they can fully implement their power and control as a dictatorships or oligarchy.

Here's to being very happy that Milton Friedman is dead and wont be personally consulting on this destruction of America's civil freedoms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. from zero to crazy in 6 lines of text
no one is going to round up union members and kill them here. Well maybe Sarah Palin, but she'll never hold elective office again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Actually been going on since at least the 1850s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_labor_issues_and_events


My own grandfather was left for dead in 1934 organizing for the IWW in the west Texas oilfields. He was beaten with clubs, breaking every bone in his body (literally). 6 years in bed, and he was up and at 'em by 1940.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Your grandfather sounds like an inspiring and heroic man
It must make you proud to be related to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plumbob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. I am! After his oldest son and daughter in law were killed in an auto
accident, he and my grandmother raised their five kids, ages 6 month to 10 years, beginning the year they turned 65. He worked as a carpenter until his 86th birthday, when my youngest cousin graduated from Texas Tech.

He came to this country in 1901 from Germany without knowing a single word of English.

I really do believe he did well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
31. What an incredible story
I'd say he definitely "did well".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bitchkitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #18
46. A great man!
The kind of man we should start electing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
32. A lot of things happening lately would have seemed crazy ten years ago.
Yeah, I don't suspect the Mass. House to go rounding up labor union leaders. I was just pointing out how dictators and oligarchs attack unions first. I could have used Hitler as an example but I thought that was over the top.

Perhaps a more recent example would be Iraq. The provisional government, established by the US, arrested and jailed union leaders 1st before implementing "free" trade policies in that country. And that was done by US federal government officials.

Maybe not as crazy as it seems on the surface.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. If this act of betrayal fails to energize the Labor movement to begin building an alternative
political party Labor is essentially dead.

Nearly 20 years ago the late Tony Mazzocchi of the Oil Chemical and Atomic Workers Union worked tirelessly to launch a bona fide Labor Party but the Labor hierarchy did not want to offend democrats so the name was changed to Labor Party Advocates. It fizzled before it got off the ground because workers knew that it was all a charade. Now, we have democrats in the "most liberal state" in the country pissing on the workers who put them in office and these bastards will probably get away with it because "where else are you going to go?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Township75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
12. I guess that Wisconsin governor isn't so bad. More Dems seem to be acting like him..
all the time.

I guess we all owe hima big apology. Maybe instead of showing up with signs to protest in WI, we should all show up with big baskets of flowers and sing songs of repentence.

Oh well, as long as we keep Repubs out of power, we can feel good about ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. MASSACHUSETTS?!
It's gotta be a typo, they must have meant Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catrose Donating Member (591 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Texas has no unions for public employees
You see stuff in the horrible newspaper in Austin like "We pay our police MORE THAN ANYBOY--$50,000/year--so we should have the right to tell them they have to live within Austin city limits." (and pay huge property taxes, never mind that they couldn't afford to live in any place they'd want to) For some reason--and not all of them monetary--many police live in the surrounding small burgs or on acreage outside of the county and town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rayofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
48. Wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonperson Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. What the USA needs is a good old fashioned
Edited on Wed Apr-27-11 07:33 AM by nonperson
Labor and tax strike.

Do no work.

Pay no taxes.

Republicans and their teabagger sock puppets want a shutdown? No problem. Let's see how well they do after a few weeks of total shutdown courtesy of we the people.

Edit to add:
Same goes for Democrats that act like Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
border_town Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
19. I live in Mass
and I haven't heard anything about this, not have I heard or seen any radio or TV commercials, and I watch the news every morning. I also find it hard to believe that our Governor Patrick is going to Wisconsin at the end of this month to be the key not speaker for their Democratic meeting. This has got to be a false story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Then call your representative...
... and ask wtf they're doing, are they all on crack?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Welibs Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
20. These are NOT Democrats, they are Blue Dog Republican plants.
These guys are a bunch of phonies and when the Dems need them most they are not there. They are too busy voting for their Republican masters.

It's good they lost a pile of their seats in 2010 and hopefully they'll lost the rest of them in 2012!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
border_town Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. This still ahs to get
through the senate and then Gov Patrick. I am very skeptical this will make it. But yes I will be in touch with my local reps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seaglass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
52. Deval Patrick led the charge google it from January. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. We desperately need to build a viable
"Labor" party to combat all of this bullshit. Austerity for us, record wealth for "them."
Damn, when do we participate in this class war?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
primavera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Thank you!
I get so sick of hearing about how Dems should refrain from engaging in class warfare while Repukes have been doing nothing but that for decades!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Admiral Loinpresser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 06:52 AM
Response to Reply #23
59. + 1,000 n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
25. Stabbed in the back by our own party. Time to take away THEIR health care. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
26. I'm getting the feeling from his wikipedia file that he is crooked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
28. is it a trap?
I wonder if this bill has something in it the courts will block...that will mess up the anti-union move? I'm hoping...otherwise i just got stabbed in the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One_Life_To_Give Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
30. Why? Is this better than negotiating?
Mass's budget problems aren't surprising or atypical. Underfunded pensions and ballooning costs of health care are putting strain on budgets everywhere including MA. Yes making changes to those benefits by the system will involve a fight, probably strikes etc. And in the end the Gov't, Employees and Taxpayers will come to an agreement (although none may like it).

So what are they afraid of? They intend to unilaterally cut health-care benefits for all MA Public Employees and declare any resulting strike illegal? Yes the options available to gov't suck, but this isn't how we do things in the America I knew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
commonsensedem Donating Member (1 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
33. Explaination
Just fyi, long time lurker, never written before. I live in Ma. and have been following this issue for awhile, it has been a huge issue among those involved in municipal politics. This is NOT Winsconsin like at all. First it does not allow municipalities to unilaterally strip unions of all bargainign rights. Second it does not affect public employees who do not work for cities and towns.

What it does do: It allows municipalities to unilaterally move their union from private insurance to the same exact insurance state employees receive. The thought behind it is if the state has more people to insure the lower the costs among its members, including cities and towns. Most communities will save hundreds of thousands of dollars. Believe it or not the idea for doing this came from the same thought process that brought together unions: together they can bargain lower rates and better services for their membership, seprated, smaller unions within small towns are at the mercy of insurance companies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
34. In my 30yr career my municipal health plan changed many times....
Edited on Wed Apr-27-11 10:36 AM by Historic NY
the only thing our union contract ever had was that it would be equal to or greater than what was presently in effect. We never got diminished service & we never bargained for it. Ny State has had many different state health insurance carriers. We didn't have supplement dental or eye glass coverage but everything else was alway top notch with Empire plan. We were allowed to sign onto the local CSEA dental & eye glass portions that they provided their members at a weekly cost.

Do they have some state plan? It sounds like eveyone operates on different pages.


http://www.cs.state.ny.us/ebd/about/index.cfm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
35. House votes to restrict unions
Source: The Boston Globe

House lawmakers voted overwhelmingly last night to strip police officers, teachers, and other municipal employees of most of their rights to bargain over health care, saying the change would save millions of dollars for financially strapped cities and towns.

The 111-to-42 vote followed tougher measures to broadly eliminate collective bargaining rights for public employees in Ohio, Wisconsin, and other states. But unlike those efforts, the push in Massachusetts was led by Democrats who have traditionally stood with labor to oppose any reduction in workers’ rights.

Unions fought hard to stop the bill, launching a radio ad that assailed the plan and warning legislators that if they voted for the measure, they could lose their union backing in the next election. After the vote, labor leaders accused House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo and other Democrats of turning their backs on public employees.

“It’s pretty stunning,’’ said Robert J. Haynes, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO. “These are the same Democrats that all these labor unions elected. The same Democrats who we contributed to in their campaigns. The same Democrats who tell us over and over again that they’re with us, that they believe in collective bargaining, that they believe in unions. . . . It’s a done deal for our relationship with the people inside that chamber.’’

Read more: http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2011/04/27/house_votes_to_limit_bargaining_on_health_care/?page=full



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. FUCKERS!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. Like the UK Labor Party, the Democratic Party...
...has outlived its usefulness. We need a true labor party in this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #37
41. Yeah. Remind me again - who do the Dems represent anymore?
cause it sure ain't me! Seems to me they represent the same type rich fuckers the republicans do. Hrmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #41
44. A slightly less scary group of wealthy backers than the Rs have. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. I'd agree with that assesment
sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Here's hoping the unions vote to restrict endorsements, campaign funding and volunteers.
I'm all for withholding support from people who don't support me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
39. The Union needs to go after every one of those
Democrats who voted for this. Get rid of them and replace them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. Unfortunately this is essentially implied by Romneycare (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoralme Donating Member (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
42. Disaster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #35
43. Can you clarify your subject line to state this is MA House & not US?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Sorry, but per LBN rules you must use the exact headline of the article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. You can add a clarification in parentheses after the title
Edited on Wed Apr-27-11 01:58 PM by hlthe2b
e.g., House votes to restrict unions (MA)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. Oops--too late on this one.
Maybe some bad news will come up tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
54. MA has 2.8m workers, 414k union mbrs 58% of which are public employees. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #54
60. So why aren't they descending on the capitol by the thousands like in WI?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #60
63. Could it be that 2.6M private non-union workers don't care about 242K public employee union mbrs?
Edited on Thu Apr-28-11 04:50 PM by jody
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainlion55 Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
55. Strike!
If everbody that is sympathetic to organized labor went out and built up two weeks of living supplies and then just stayed home and played with the kids or dogs for two weeks we would bring the plutocracy to its knee's!!! :wtf: :argh: :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-27-11 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
56. This sign would play nicely on the streets of MA ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
61. I'm. Speechless.
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-28-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
65. Bipartisan effort across the country to destroy unions....
Why can't bipartisan efforts be toward bringing home the troops, or giving the rest of the country the same health care that they get off or our dime....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-29-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
67. Single payer anyone?
I am just wondering how long its going to take before we take a serious look at single payer as a party and tell the American people this is the way of the future because it will lower the cost of health care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC