Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nato strike 'kills Saif al-Arab Gaddafi', Libya says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Viva_La_Revolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 05:46 PM
Original message
Nato strike 'kills Saif al-Arab Gaddafi', Libya says
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 05:55 PM by Viva_La_Revolution
Source: BBC

A Nato air strike in the Libyan capital, Tripoli, has killed the son of the Libyan leader, Colonel Gadaffi, a government spokesman has said.

Colonel Gaddafi himself was in the house which was hit by the strike, the spokesman added, but he was unharmed.

His son Saif al-Arab was killed, as well as three of the Libyan leader's grandsons.

Read more: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13251570



BreakingNews Breaking News
Update from Tripoli: Moammar Gadhafi was in house hit by NATO missile, escaped injury, Libyan official says - AP

ShababLibya‎ Ibrahim Musa al Gaddafi - spokesman for gaddafi regime claims NATO killed Saif al Arab Gaddafi (younger son) tonight as his house was hit

NATO strike kills Gadhafi's son, Saif al-Arab Gadhafi, Libyan official says - Reuters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EmmettKelly Donating Member (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hurumph, the almighty Ronald Reagan could only get
an adopted daughter, that pales in comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
71. A daughter who was adopted posthumously by Gaddafi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #71
119. lol. it was a three year old, if adopted "posthumously" does that make the murder more righteous?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. BBC link
A Nato air strike in the Libyan capital, Tripoli, has killed the son of the Libyan leader, Colonel Gadaffi, a government spokesman has said.

Colonel Gaddafi himself was in the house which was hit by the strike, the spokesman added, but he was unharmed.

His son Saif al-Arab was killed, as well as three of the Libyan leader's grandsons.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13251570

as well as three of the Libyan leader's grandsons.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
72. Moussa Ibrahim said they were nieces and nephews of Saif al-Arab
Ibrahim would not give the names of the three children, who he claimed were killed, except to say they were nieces and nephews of Saif al-Arab and that they were younger than 12. He said they are not releasing the names yet to protect the privacy of the family.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/04/2011430224755721620.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is just fucking sad. You go to assassinate Saddam, or Qaddafi, or what ever fuck wad your mad a...
and before you know it, wedding parties are getting bombed by predator drones. How many fucking civilians do you have to kill to take out one dictator? Hell Saddam is dead and we are still over there killing civilians. This country is fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. agree.
i just take no satisfaction whatsoever from this news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Hunh Ghadaffi is not innocent in this event
His oppressive regime has killed thousands of it's own citizens. His citizens have taken up arms against him. His military was bombing by air and helecopters a resistance that had handguns and rifles. Ghadaffi had the chance like other Middle Eastern Leaders to stand down and accept the fact that their citizens are done with them. HE made the decision in his war on the citizens.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8423934/Libya-claims-of-rape-murder-and-kidnap-as-vengeful-Gaddafi-troops-renew-assault-on-rebel-held-Misrata.html


Ghaddaffi using cluster bombs on civilian populations?
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42610762/ns/world_news-mideast/n_africa/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-13251570

Ghadaffi could have gotten his grandchildren out but he didn't. Why? Because he was going to use any means necessary to crush the civilians who don't want to be his slaves anymore. The grandkids should have never been sacrificed by this madman.


Junior should have taken him out years ago but that didn't happen because just like all of the other dictators they were in bed with him.

There is no easy answer, I am not a big fan of violence and war. I do believe in evening the playing field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Devil_Fish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. The children are Innocent. That's mainly what I'm sad about. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Not for some.
Guilt is hereditary, or can be displaced to the first bad guy in line. Whatever happens, it must be placed at the feet of somebody that we know is guilty, already, so as to shelter those we like and feel sorry for.

If a little kid reaches for candy after being told no and his father lands a good one so that it breaks his skill, there's always the chance the father will say, "If he'd just done what I said, he'd be okay now, so it's his own damned fault."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. It's not that difficult to recognize that assassination is wrong. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
59. The worst kind of person in the world -
is one who puts himself in a position of power over others against their will. The usual eventual thing then is a war to depose a tyrant, where armies of regular people are assembled and arrayed in the field against each other to fight and kill and destroy in merciless battle until "the balance is tipped" and too few are left alive on one side or the other. Then if the tyrant (who has meanwhile been living quite well in his palaces) wins, books and songs are written, and he becomes the hero of the age. If the tyrant loses, then he probably negotiates a comfortable retirement somewhere out of the way.

In either case, in the destroyed villages and cities, while burying the the many dead on all sides of violence, disease, famine, accident and misery, the devastated families ponder whether assassination is really all that wrong.

Again, the worst kind of person in the world is one that puts himself in a position of power over others against their will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. You could say the same thing for the political elite of NATO
that decided to manipulate the Libyan uprising.

Obama, for instance, is at a party right now, no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #59
120. oh, please. libya was not overrun with "violence, disease, famine, accident & misery".
Edited on Mon May-02-11 01:04 AM by Hannah Bell
unlike, say, congo, where the us has engaged in decades of proxy war & millions of deaths.

the freaking hypocrisy of all this pious handwringing is soo fucking disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #120
125. I was speaking of the leaders of war in general
and the "morality" of targeting those responsible for war, rather than the people who follow them. I know you have fixed opinions, but in bending the statement into something you can disagree with you do miss the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
47. I think you really ned to do a deeper dig on the geo-petrol genesis of this, as well as tribal......
dynamic relations in Libya, the standard of living there (amongst the highest in Africa), Libya-Chinese-Russian recent alliances (that the west hates) and the US/UK using al-Quaeda in the eastern part of the country. Also, the quite possible set-up of Libya for the Lockerbie bombing (to cover up CIA rogue drug running ops in Lebanon and Syria), whilst you digging.





Lockerbie evidence 'planted by CIA'

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/lockerbie-evidence-planted-by-cia-1586487.html

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

from the The Week (UK)

How Megrahi and Libya were framed for Lockerbie

Alexander Cockburn: Amid all the fuss about Megrahi’s early release, there remains strong evidence he didn’t do it

http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/66187,news-comment,news-politics,how-abdelbaset-al-megrahi-and-libya-were-framed-for-lockerbie-bombing

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lockerbie Diary: Gadhaffi, Fall Guy for CIA Drug Running (Scoop from The Independent- New Zealand)
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1103/S00072/lockerbie-diary-gadhaffi-fall-guy-for-cia-drug-running.htm

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8407047/Libyan-rebel-commander-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html

"Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi's regime.

In an interview with the Italian newspaper Il Sole 24 Ore, Mr al-Hasidi admitted that he had recruited "around 25" men from the Derna area in eastern Libya to fight against coalition troops in Iraq. Some of them, he said, are "today are on the front lines in Adjabiya".

Mr al-Hasidi insisted his fighters "are patriots and good Muslims, not terrorists," but added that the "members of al-Qaeda are also good Muslims and are fighting against the invader".

His revelations came even as Idriss Deby Itno, Chad's president, said al-Qaeda had managed to pillage military arsenals in the Libyan rebel zone and acquired arms, "including surface-to-air missiles, which were then smuggled into their sanctuaries"....................


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

flashback 2 years (including Young Turks video) more US support of terrorist groups

Saudis and CIA back Khalid Sheikh Mohammad’s Jundullah in Pakistan and Iran?

http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/02/07/saudis-and-cia-back-khalid-sheikh-mohammads-jundullah-in-pakistan-and-iran
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

flashhback to 2007 (BBC)

Libyan Islamists 'join al-Qaeda'

Zawahri called for North African leaders to be overthrown
A Libyan Islamist group has joined al-Qaeda, according to an audio message on the internet attributed to the radical network's second-in-command.
Ayman al-Zawahri purportedly said the Fighting Islamic Group in Libya was becoming part of al-Qaeda.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7076604.stm

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

flasback to 2002 (Guardian UK) French intelligence experts revealed how western intelligence agencies bankrolled a Libyan Al-Qaeda cell

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2002/nov/10/uk.davidshayler

MI6 'halted bid to arrest bin Laden'Startling revelations by French intelligence experts back David Shayler's alleged 'fantasy'about Gadaffi plot

British intelligence paid large sums of money to an al-Qaeda cell in Libya in a doomed attempt to assassinate Colonel Gadaffi in 1996 and thwarted early attempts to bring Osama bin Laden to justice.
The latest claims of MI6 involvement with Libya's fearsome Islamic Fighting Group, which is connected to one of bin Laden's trusted lieutenants, will be embarrassing to the Government, which described similar claims by renegade MI5 officer David Shayler as 'pure fantasy'


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




The Power of Nightmares, subtitled The Rise of the Politics of Fear, is a 3 part BBC documentary film series, written and produced by Adam Curtis.
The films compare the rise of the Neo-Conservative movement in the United States and the radical Islamist movement, making comparisons on their origins and claiming similarities between the two. More controversially, it argues that the threat of radical Islamism as a massive, sinister organized force of destruction, specifically in the form of al-Qaeda, is a myth perpetrated by politicians in many countries—and particularly American Neo-Conservatives—in an attempt to unite and inspire their people following the failure of earlier, more utopian ideologies.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5lByw7kvS0&feature=related part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ai6LhnW4Oa8&feature=related part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HvzR8w1z2g&feature=related part 3

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

remember, the USA seeds of al-Qaeda started in 1978 and 1979, under Robert Gates of the Carter regime, now he has been the Sec of Defense under both Bush and Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #47
104. ^ WOW ^ Stockholmer, you put it all together!
Thank you for the effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
65. Thanks for posting Madmaddie, I could not agree more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dokkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. There will be more of this
If theres anything the americans know how to do, it is killing brown people from the sky and dumping depleted uranium rounds in their city so even when the they miss the shot, generation of their enemy would suffer the consequences.

Death from the sky weeewt!!
USA USA USA USA USA USA

Am going to be sick for a while now :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stockholmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
30. +1, sadly
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
38. As if we know more about killing than the MidEast!
Wake up! Take a history course. ANY history course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #38
81. The United States has leveled entire countries on numerous occasions.
You are the one in dire need of a history lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #81
100. You beat me to it - a great point
At a bare minimum, 288,000 muslims in the last 30 years. Probably closer to 1 million.

http://walt.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/11/30/why_they_hate_us_ii_how_many_muslims_has_the_us_killed_in_the_past_30_years

And that's just for starters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnie624 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #100
102. Thanks for the link.
A person might concoct a semi-coherent argument for supporting the West's policies in the Middle East (which have always been about controlling resources), but to claim the countries there have killed more people than the U.S. government is odd. One doesn't have to be "anti-American" to recognize the fact that when the U.S. military drops bombs on other countries, lots and lots of people die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #38
112. What did Libya do to us ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #112
124. You mean, other than downing an airliner over Scotland? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
88. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Yep.
It's disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
37. Yeah. We're the only ones who ever did anything like that.
A whole lot of sons and grandchildren are being lost to Libya in this fight. Gaddafi and his family had a fine time for a long time. Frankly, I think it's NICE that there's a price to pay for that.

They had the chance to leave. They decided to fight to the death. This is what that looks like. Death. Root and branch.

It was fine by them to kill as many as it took to remain in power. Payback's a bitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #37
73. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
108. I agree. Doesn't matter to them if kids are killed or anything
All of NATO just seems to be another arm of the Military Industrial Complex. Also, why Gaddafi so important?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #3
115. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. I should think they'll let the dogs loose in the morning.
I would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. How anyone could be pleased about this or find this a way to deal with former "friends of America"
Well... when we Americans become KILLERS...we will suffer more killings of our own people.

If this is true...it's how low the Western World/NATO/UN's has sunk to support WARFARE AND KILLING of INNOCENTS...instead of Diplomacy.

We are indeed heading to WWIII...It's too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
105. KoKo, you see what I'm afraid to predict.
Nobody in the world trusts the USA. Our government 'befriends some leader or dictator, then turns on them whenever convenient.

Remember Karzai said something like that about 2 years ago? He's been hedging his bets with the Taliban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can we believe Libyan spokesman? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Are you having a laugh.
The live footage is all over UK TV news. The journalists have all been invited to go there at daybreak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
medeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
101. experts skeptical in Daily Beast
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. ...as thousands on both sides put their lives on the line
their own lives and the lives of their families, all over the f*k'd up mind of a dictator who won't leave and calls his countrymen dogs and cockroaches...

I have to say, being pretty thoroughly anti-war, I have no particular sympathy for the guys at the top who pen out the orders in their perfumed marble palaces, and who's decisions pit tens of thousands of regular people in struggles to the death with tens of thousands of other regular people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
29. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. pretty hole
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 06:49 PM by jakeXT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
15. Too bad for the kids
their father was piece of human garbage that deserved to die.

Now get that lucky SOB Muammar!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. Kadafi son, grandchildren killed in airstrike
Source: LA Times

Kadafi son, grandchildren killed in airstrike
Los Angeles Times | April 30, 2011


Libyan leader Moammar Kadafi survived a NATO missile strike Saturday that killed his a son and three grandchildren and wounded friends and relatives, Libya's spokesman said.

Kadafi and his wife were in the Tripoli house of his son, Saif al-Arab Kadafi , when it was hit by at least one missile fired by a NATO warplane, according to Libyan spokesman Moussa Ibrahim.

The one-story house in a Tripoli residential neighborhood was heavily damaged.

Read more: http://link.latimes.com/r/BLQF5E/71ZIS/NJ3GHN/N3M2W/EKX8Z6/XL/h
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Incitatus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It is clear that they are targeting him. Kadafi is going to die. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. And it's a mistake.
We've done it before, when it could be deemed personal, in trying to off Saddam.

Now that assassination is official NATO policy, there's no moral high ground if somebody decides the just and good thing to do is kill Cameron or Sarkozy, Obama or Merkel--or any of their kids. After all, fair's fair.

Of course, it's only fair if we do it. It's beyond reprehensible if they do it. We get to decide universal morality, after all, and how the universe is when rightly ordered. Even if we have to do the ordering (around).

At least NATO should have the moral conscience to do it in a weaselly way, with poison or exploding potted plants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. I understand what you say and agree...this is a terrible time we live in..Blood Lust..No Controls..
There's not much one can look to these days. It's kill or be killed...who is next? If Obama and his Children were taken out...would there be cheering over this? What if folks see us the same as we are supposed to see them and decide that "WE" are the enemy?

We are NOT THE RULERS OF THIS WORLD...and any Civilization/Empire who ever THOUGHT they WERE RULERS...are now in the History Books as FAIL! FAIL!

This is NOT the AMERICA I WAS TAUGHT about...CONSTITUTION/BILL OF RIGHTS! THIS IS SOMETHING EVIL that has taken hold and it's why we of some Moral/Ethical Persuasion need to FIGHT BACK against this kind of Action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. As opposed to what other time?
Really, has NOBODY here read a history book? ANY history book?

How about the Bible? Checked that out for moral warfare?

You've got to stop taking tests with Cliff Notes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #31
94. Who would kill Obama, and why, vs. who would kill Khadaffi, and why?
False equivalence makes the argument reduced to absurdity. Is Obama at war with US citizens in the south, dropping bombs on Atlanta, rolling tanks through Florida?

Also, the US has a moral right, and legal obligation, to prevent mass slaughter of people by madmen. It's in the Constitution, BTW. The whole thing about "treaties", and our UN treaties, in particular... which obligate us to act to prevent slaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #94
113. What did Gaddafi or his grandchildren do to us ?
we just killed his grand kids. Forget analogies.

The Constitution and the UN do NOT say you can assassinate heads of state, let alone miss and kill children.

How do drones and cruise missiles fired from thousands of miles away "prevent slaughter" ? Seems like just the opposite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #113
116. How old were you on December 21, 1988?
I'm guessing very young, or you weren't following the news.

Are you also asking what did Osama Bin Laden ever do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #116
121. which was after we tried to kill him in 1986.
Edited on Mon May-02-11 01:09 AM by Hannah Bell
so obviously "lockerbie" isn't the answer to that question.

good to know the "international community" is ok with assassinating other country's leaders.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #121
123. The question was not "what has he done lately".
...and when they are given an opportunity to surrender to a court of law, without escalating to violence, it isn't assassination.

It's suicide by cop.

It's quite popular among the mentally deranged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #94
127. If the South took up arms against this president, what
would the US military do about it??

The Consitution DOES NOT give a US president permission to assassinate leaders of other countries, PARTICULARLY when they are not attacking the US.

All of our treaties underscore that we must abide by agreed-upon laws. What law permits extra-judicial assassinations of foreign leaders? Please link me to that law!

Btw, when Bush even hinted at such violations of the law, the 'left' was outraged and called him a 'dictator'. Since when did we come to the conclusion that Bush was right after all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
45. Yup. No "command and control center" excuse here.
NATO wants him gone. Wonder if he'll take the hint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #45
95. You don't think the leader of the armed forces is a valid target? The top soldier?
He puts on a soldier uniform, he makes himself a legal target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
106. Igel, you have just explained why fundamentalist Islam is gaining converts.
Middle Eastern and North African Muslims have nowhere to look but to Allah for justice. They feel persecuted in this world. They are very smart about the history of Western Imperialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. (LA Times update) NATO strike kills youngest son of Libyan leader Moammar Kadafi
From the Associated Press
April 30, 2011

.Libyan leader Moammar Kadafi survived a NATO missile strike Saturday that killed his youngest son and three grandchildren and wounded friends and relatives, Libya's spokesman said.

Kadafi and his wife were in the Tripoli house of his 29-year-old son, Saif al-Arab Kadafi, when it was hit by at least one missile fired by a NATO warplane, according to Libyan spokesman Moussa Ibrahim.

"The leader himself is in good health," Ibrahim said. "He was not harmed. The wife is also in good health."

"The attack resulted in the martyrdom of brother Saif al-Arab Kadafi, 29 years old, and three of the leader's grandchildren," Ibrahim said.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-kadafi-son-killed-20110430,0,6137491.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
44. "29 years old and his three children" ...his wife was spared.
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 07:57 PM by KoKo
Okay..... I wonder what kind of bloody scene that was. Did the three children die instantly or in agony..writhing in pain, suffering until the lights went out for them?

Death is not always instant. Children's deaths are particularly hard to deal with unless one is a psychopath who gets off on that kind of thing.

This seems to be something terrible as more news comes out. I don't know how Nato can justify this. But, they will and in a day or two no one will remember any of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freshwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Same thing done by Reagan. Deja vu.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Wow! That's really escalating things.
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 06:54 PM by MineralMan
I wonder whose idea that was. Since he was not killed, he'll be out making propaganda over this as soon as he can. Not a good result.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
36. Making propaganda? Who was killed? Who is spinning killing?
HUH?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Yes, making propaganda.
I know who was reported to have been killed. I'm spinning nothing. My opinion is that we should stay the fuck out of the Middle East altogether. That has always been my opinion.

This little sortie did not work out well. Such things rarely do. It was a bad idea.

Please direct your anger more appropriately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I have no idea what we are doing there?
We need to be out of there now though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
79. My country murders children.
Edited on Sun May-01-11 12:04 AM by Octafish
I thought I voted to put a stop to this.



What happened to change my, eh, expectations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #16
83. "according to Libyan spokesman Moussa Ibrahim"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
24. This is a terrible thing which has been done..it will be on all our heads and souls.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. WHO THE FUCK do we think we are?
What a bullshit, slapdash, slipshod, on-the-cheap, addle-headed little imperial fiasco we've decided to sustain. Happy SIXTH WEEK of this crap, and we can't mount a coherent effort here.

So we killed his son and three of his grandsons. Are we proud of that? Meanwhile, in Benghazi, the fundamentalist hobby-heroes fire their guns into the air, delighting in the possibility that the great Satan is in trouble.

There are mothers and siblings here, and even though they've enjoyed the fruits of wealth, their family members are dead. This guy's not Saddam. His sons aren't like Uday and Qusay. He's actually done things for his people, and much of the revolutionary outcry is from people in Benghazi and other Cyrenaican cities and towns who lost loved ones when their relatives went on a fundamentalist frenzy against Qaddafi 16 years ago.

I guess they can fire their guns into the air in infantile enthusiasm now that the Qataris--and certainly others--are so thoroughly violating the embargo.

Here is what our President and other leaders need to understand: privileged as we are with such great power, we need to be good stewards of the world's dreams. Okay, fine, stop laughing. Here's the real issue: if we're going to mount a WAR, which is what this is, we need to do it in the most effective way. This is ugly. This is sloppy and selfish.

I'm going to go hug the kids right now, and FUCK YOU to all those who cry crocodile tears about the saving of the many thousands who never got killed in Benghazi. These are real deaths. Sure, they're children of privilege, but they're deaths nonetheless.

We suck as a nation for this, and we will pay for it. This will reverberate in untold ways, and any R2P sanctimoniousness will be undercut in so many ways by this.

Remember why Bill Maher got such flack from ABC? It was because of his line about being cowardly for killing from the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. K&R..for your taking time to show the consequences of actions...
Remember, thought that few people read long posts, thoughtful posts, in this time, here on DU.

But, in these times, who of good conscience should or can remain SILENT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
42. The defense of dictators is always impressive.
And the fundamentalists who lost family? Too damn bad for them.

WHAT are you smoking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
54. I claim...WHAT?
Pretty sure I didn't say what you think I said.

Saying something is "impressive" is "trashing"? Really. Well, I am impressed that anyone could decide that killing dictators and their families is wrong but no biggie to kill fundamentalists when they have been annoying which is what was posited by the poster to whom I replied. Seemed to rip the moral high ground right out from under him and I think it's fair to notice that.

And since this discussion is all about the morality of killing whoever, it does seem to fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #42
58. Tears for theocrats?
Those who would force their worldview on others aren't "good"; they're nasty, selfish and primitive.

This man, for all his many faults, has been inclusive. Religionists HATE "others" and demand their exclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #58
68. INCLUSIVE? GADDAFI INCLUSIVE? TELL THAT TO THE BERBERS.
TELL THAT TO THE MUSLIMS.

TELL THAT TO THE AFRICANS HE BLAMED FOR ISSUES IN THE EARLY 2000s.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #42
110. It's hard to justify claiming the moral highground at this point
Had we not intervened, there's a strong likelihood the revolution would have been put down by now.

Maybe not, of course, since I don't have the soothsaying ability of so many of the interventionists.

The "rebels" need to take some responsibility for taking up arms when they didn't really have the numbers or ability to win, and they should also take responsibility for fighting in urban areas without allowing safe passage for civilians. They're essentially using human shields in Misrata, although nobody seems to want to hear the term used against a group that is so morally unquestionable.

We started this. We have the ultimate responsibility. We also have the responsibility for the children in Misrata, and I do feel bad for them as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #32
69. Where were you with the 20 verified children deaths in Misrata?
You know, from cluster munitions. Oh right, you blamed the fucking rebels for Gaddafi's use of extreme force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #69
84. The rebels take no responsibility for putting others at risk
Human shields.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #84
98. See? The double standard is hilarious.
Misrata indiscriminately shelled with cluster munitions = focused strikes on an insurgency.

NATO attacks a military compound = Gaddafi family home was attacked (nevermind the pictures show that the house was built like a fucking bunker).

The rebels moved the vast majority of the Misratian population away from the fire zone.

Gaddafi, if the report is to be believed (and I still don't know if it's true), brings his grandchildren to the center of his military compound.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #32
103. Maher's comment was that it was BRAVE to suicide-kill. Not the opposite,
as you suggest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #103
126. Here's the quote; it's what I said it was
"We have been the cowards. Lobbing cruise missiles from two thousand miles away. That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building. Say what you want about it. Not cowardly. You're right."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
34. I am keeping my perspective about this.
That son of a bitch was just as guilty as his father of murdering the people of Libya. I wonder how the families of those who have been murdered by the Gaddafi regime feel about this? I wonder how the families of the two journalist who were killed feel about this? I wonder how the families of Pan Am flight 103 feel about this? I don't care who's son he was, he has been playing a direct part in slaughter of innocent humans and I am thankful that he can no longer do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #34
40. Your perspective is a rationalization for murder.
It's wrong when Gaddafi does it. It's still wrong when we do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #40
50. I appreciate what you are saying and I do agree, murder is wrong.
That said, should the world just sit by and watch? I hate war, God knows I hate war. However, it is the high, unfortunate cost of liberation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. Do you feel Iraq has been "Liberated?" Vietnam, Korea were liberated when we lost those wars?
Are we Americans "LIBERATED" by your standards.

Should the Iraqi's, Vietnamese, Koreans and Libyans have decided THEMSELVES...who would liberate them?

Do we Own their Countries or do their CITIZENS own their countries.

Would it be Okay if someone decided America needs Liberation? Would you have condoned Bush and Laura and their kids being killed for stealing an election, driving our economy and world's economy to the brink by supporting more and more deregulation?

Should we have been Liberated from Bush? How about Nixon? How about McCain/Palin ...if they had won.

What if the Global Economy thought that American Banksters had taken everything down and decided to hunt down and kill off American Banksters, HedgFunds and Stock Market Traders and started picking off them and their wives and killing their children?

Would we think that was justification for their evilness?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firebrand Gary Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #52
55. Thank you for completely ignoring what I said.
It must be nice to live in your idea of freedom. Yes, our own country still has issues. We do still make mistakes, it is expected. Remember that we are a young democracy. No matter how we slice it, the world can be a dark place.

AGAIN, I HATE EVERYTHING ABOUT WAR.

Just because I feel that way does not change the FACT that many innocent people are still being killed by the hands of their brutal dictators. These people will never have the opportunity to fight for their livelihoods so long as they are beaten down and submissive by an oppressive regime of Gaddafi's size.

As for the rest of your commentary, I'd appreciate as a fellow progressive that in the future you would refrain from the attempt of marginalization you encroached upon. The silly Bush, Nixon, McCain/Palin liberation point is ridiculous. WE ARE NOT KILLING OUR OWN PEOPLE!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #55
85. Well buckle up, because Gaddafi is going to kill everyone and everything he can
as he goes down. Count on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arrowhead2k1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #34
53. I wonder how the families of the victims of the regimes of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 08:28 PM by Arrowhead2k1
who have been murdered by their respective regimes feel. We don't raise a finger to help them, we keep supporting those regimes.

This is about US/NATO interests and a vain attempt to rearrange the balance of power in their favor. Nothing more. Anyone who thinks our forces are there to actually help poor people get better rights for themselves is just buying into the bullshit. 3 children were vaporized today thanks to NATO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
41. That is horrible. We killed his son and three grandsons. Three innocent
children. My God! What kind of monsters are we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. Normal kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. Hyperbole much?
I don't have a lot of patience with high horse righteousness.

I'm a whole lot more interested in WHY NATO chose to bomb an obviously non-military target after making a military excuse the last time.

Is it possible it was done as a warning to Syria which is getting quite bloody? Or is NATO getting sick of the mess and figured the quickest way out is just to kill the bastard?

I'm always sympathetic when targets hide themselves among "innocents" and depend for their safety on the humanity of their hunters. Aren't you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harmonicon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
56. Yeah, I guess assassination isn't illegal anymore... who knew? nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
60. HAS THIS BEEN VERIFIED?
By some source not associated with Gadhafi?

If it's true, I can only say that Moammar should be hung for hiding behind the children. Those children should have been removed from harm's way weeks or months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #60
64. No. This is only going by what Gaddafi's spokesman Moussa Ibrahim is saying.
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 09:51 PM by Turborama
No bodies have been shown, no evidence apart from rubble and big holes in the small house the footage is coming from.

Skepticism should not just be directed at Susan Rice, NATO, etc, people who are hearing this news should be skeptical of Gaddafi's propaganda machine, too.

For a start, I don't believe Gaddafi Senior was in that small house in a residential district. He's most probably safely tucked away in one of his bunkers at night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #64
66. +1
Gaddafi was not in that house. There's no evidence whatsoever to support that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #64
74. First reports can be wrong, that's true.
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 11:09 PM by EFerrari
However that doesn't explain why NATO is bombing a house in a residential district. That hasn't been disputed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #74
75. NATO confirms strike but not Gadhafi’s son’s death
TRIPOLI: NATO says it struck a government building in Tripoli but can’t confirm that one of Moammar Gadhafi’s sons was killed.

Sunday’s statement comes hours after an airstrike that the Libya regime said killed Gadhafi’s youngest son Seif al-Arab and three of the Libyan leader’s grandchildren. Gadhafi escaped unharmed.

NATO says it struck a “command and control building in the Bab al-Azizya neighborhood” Saturday evening, insisting all its targets are military in nature and linked to Gadhafi’s systematic attacks on the population.

Lt. Gen. Charles Bouchard says he is aware of unconfirmed reports that some Gadhafi family members may have been killed and he regrets “all loss of life, specially the innocent civilians being harmed as a result of the ongoing conflict.” - AP

http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/NATOconfirmsstrikebutnotGadhafi__8217_sson__8217_sdeath/Article/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #74
76. "First reports" can not only be "wrong", they can also be fabricated &/or embellished with lies. n/t
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 11:21 PM by Turborama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. Right, like claiming this house is a command and control center.
There's a lot of BS flying in both or maybe every direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #77
78. We don't know whether it was or not. As I said above, skepticism should go both ways. n/t
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 11:31 PM by Turborama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
62. good job NATO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
63. The USA keeps digging a hole

Oh yeah...sure it was NATO and all but...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
67. It was reported in February that this son had defected and was taking refuge in Benghazi
Edited on Sat Apr-30-11 10:58 PM by Turborama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #67
87. It was reported by PressTV. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #87
90. And this story about NATO killing the same son is sourced directly from Gaddafi's spokesman. n/t
Edited on Sun May-01-11 01:31 AM by Turborama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #90
93. Yep. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #87
91. Also, I don't know if you noticed but that 1st link was from The Independent (UK)
The UK's most anti-war broadsheet newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #91
92. They reported a rumor, not a fact. "It was said that".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #92
99. At the moment, it's only a rumor that one of Gaddafi's sons & 3 grandchildren were killed by NATO
By that standard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #99
114. By the standard of reading what is written?
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:35 AM
Response to Reply #114
117. No, "It was said by ---- fill in blank ----" (Moussa Ibrahim in this instance) = a rumor.
Edited on Mon May-02-11 01:05 AM by Turborama
It is and will remain a rumor until there is verifiable proof.

Rumor

A rumor or rumour (see spelling differences) is often viewed as "an unverified account or explanation of events circulating from person to person and pertaining to an object, event, or issue in public concern" (33)<1> However, a review of the research on rumor conducted by Pendleton in 1998 found that research across sociology, psychology, and communication studies had widely varying definitions of rumor.<2> Thus, rumor is a concept that lacks a particular definition in the social sciences. But most theories agree that rumor involves some kind of a statement whose veracity is not quickly or ever confirmed. In addition, some scholars have identified rumor as a subset of propaganda, the latter another notoriously difficult concept to define.

A pioneer of propaganda studies, Harold Lasswell defined propaganda in 1927 as referring "solely to the control of opinion by significant symbols, or, to speak more concretely and less accurately, by stories, rumors, reports, pictures, and other forms of social communication" (1927:9).<3> Rumors are also often discussed with regard to "misinformation" and "disinformation" (the former often seen as simply false and the latter seen as deliberately false, though usually from a government source given to the media or a foreign government).<4> Rumors thus have often been viewed as particular forms of other communication concepts.

Full Wikipedia entry with references: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumor

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muskypundit Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-11 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
70. Wouldnt be surprised if it was just his son killed
Take anything from Qaddafi with a grain of salt. Just like the piles of civilians 'killed by nato airstrikes' they gathered who had obvious gunshot wounds, it wouldn't surprise me if no children actually were killed. Just like it wouldn't surprise me if children did die. Thats part of the mess, when there is no source of trustworthy info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
80. Are we completely insane?
Where is the threat from Libya?We are wasting our money on a war that is none of our business.Why do we sit on the side lines when Israel invade another country,but we invade Libya because they are having internal problems,sheer madness?.We wonder why the Arab(Muslims) countries hate America,put on your thinking caps America?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #80
82. "We kill Arabs don't we?
The insanity continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #80
86. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #80
89. In a word, yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJvR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:47 AM
Response to Original message
96. The devil...
...protects his own.

Ah well better luck next time, although I suspect Gaddafi is going to be lurking in hospital and school basements from now on. The bombing of top officials should be expanded, why kill nobodies who are only following orders, more or less enthusiasticly, when you can nail the guys who actually gives the orders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinNY Donating Member (59 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
97. Thought this was suppose to be a no-fly zone only?
Obama said Qaddafi wasn't targeted, remember? Now we're killing little kids.

I was at Syracuse when 35 fellow students were killed over Lockerbie. The ones I knew wouldn't want this.

How many more Lockerbies have we just inspired?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #97
107. In our names the militarists have created a thousand Guernicas of pain and despair.
In our names the militarists have created a thousand Guernicas of pain and despair.

LostinNY, you are right. Violence begets violence, not peace. Not unless 'we' are willing to do the unspeakable and nearly exterminate all the enemies 'we've' made. because 'we' are surely not making friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
109. Did "Change" in '08 mean we'd change to more wars and brutality?
Can't blame that idiot Bush for this one. Time to elect an anti-war president. The last one was Carter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
111. Lots of antennas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #111
118. Good catch. Also constructed using heavily reinforced concrete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cqo_000 Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-02-11 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #118
122. Saif al-Arab death confirmed
ROME: The most senior Catholic official in Tripoli on Sunday confirmed on Italian television that Libyan strongman Muammar Gaddafi's son Saif al-Arab had been killed and appealed for a ceasefire.

"I confirm the death of the son of the leader," Giovanni Martinelli, the bishop of Tripoli, told the Sky TG24 channel.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/Bishop-confirms-Gaddafi-sons-death-calls-for-ceasefire/articleshow/8138218.cms



French surgeon Gerrard Le Clouerec, who does not work for the Libyan government, was asked to independently identify the bodies of Saif al-Arab and two children. He said all three had died due to a blast. He said the children's faces had been obliterated by the blast so they were difficult to identify.

Le Clouerec said he also saw the body of a young man of about 30, with a beard and a thin moustache whose face matched a photograph he had been shown of Saif al-Arab.

http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFLDE71Q0MP20110502?sp=true

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC