Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Automakers Skid in J.D. Powers' Initial Quality Survey of New Cars

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
mahatmakanejeeves Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 03:23 PM
Original message
U.S. Automakers Skid in J.D. Powers' Initial Quality Survey of New Cars
Edited on Thu Jun-23-11 03:27 PM by mahatmakanejeeves
Source: ABC News

U.S. automakers, led by Ford Motor Co., plunged in this year's closely watched J.D. Power and Associates' Initial Quality Study of new vehicles while Toyota's Lexus brand topped the list.

Lexus' top-selling LS sedan had the fewest problems reported by new car purchasers in the past year. Honda, Acura, Mercedes-Benz and Mazda were next in having the fewest initial problems.

Ford, which has seen a resurgence in sales in the past several years, had a dismal performance, falling to No. 23 from fifth place last year, mainly based on problems with the in-dash, touch-screen monitors found on many of its Ford and Lincoln models. Still, Ford didn't score as low in quality as bottom-rated Dodge, Mitsubishi and Suzuki

Automakers are increasingly loading their cars with technology that boosts mileage and offers new features; and consumers are finding them frustratingly difficult to use.
....

The full J.D. Power survey.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/us-automakers-skid-jd-powers-initial-quality-survey/story?id=13914749
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uh-oh. As my dad used to say, "Every power anything on a car
is another thing that will break." Now, with touch screens and electronics throughout a car, you're playing with very expensive fire. Everything that breaks is gonna cost you a pile. As the car ages, more an more systems will fail.

The day of the 10 year old car being a reliable option is about over, I'm afraid, as these new cars get older. Damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 10 year old car = 10 year old computer.
Cars are so much more now than motors attached to wheels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clayton72 Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And those gizmos go obsolete fast
I was trying to tell my dad about how great GPS's are and my uncle tried to support my position saying he loves the GPS built into his Cadilac, it's just annoying how they got to keep changing map CD's when they cross the county line... say what?!? 10 years might as well be 100 with the way the technology changes. I'm not buying another car until I can plug it in. I'm done with gas.

And TV wise, I'm going to wait for the 3D TV's you don't need glasses for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boppers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. LOL, GPS with a CD?
Must be a pre-flash model?

My solution has been to buy older cars, and buy the compute components separately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. MacWorld editors recommend iPads over many tech options offered by automakers
Better value
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yep, a standalone GPS is much better....
when the Garmin is obsolete, toss it and get a new one without any fuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. You know, you can upgrade.

Unlike most automobile components, you can replace the GPS without compromising the rest of the vehicles. And autos are going to be made more and more with soft- and hardware upgrades in mind.

That also means software "patches."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Too late. Cars have been bundled with electronics for a couple decades now.

. . . and reliability has been going up, not down. You never used to see any car ending it's life with 3-4 hundred thousand miles on it. That's not so unusual now. (That's about 15-20 times around the planet.) Moreover, many times if they end their lives, it's because they've either been totaled out in an accident or they're rusting out.

Electronics are probably one of the more reliable systems automobile systems, provided the electronics are good to begin with, and practical. Ford's system apparently isn't either. I just had an on-board electronics repair done on my eleven-year old Saturn. The first one in its life. It cost $175.

The computer system probably sells retail for less than a second rate laptop would, and they make connecting up the system as easy as plugging in a USB device, only with a lot of things in they way.

Also, as anyone who remembers the cars of the 70s and 80s would know, today's computerized vehicles run much better. Electronics have improved them.

In other words, I think your warning is all sweat and worry and not supported by anything factual, you Dad's expectations notwithstanding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. I still love my Cad and Chevy pickup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. I can't support doing computer-aided design while driving.
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-24-11 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Corruption Winz Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm a Ford guy....
and I find it hard to take this as a big "take that" moment when it comes to other American companies. Good lord. 23 is the best we can do?

OKay.. So, this is one more thing that we simply don't do better than the rest of the world.

Greatest country in the world....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuddnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't put much stock in JD Powers.
I've had dealings with some of their "#1 in customer service" companies, such as Dish Network. I've never wanted to reach through a phone and strangle someone more, in my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. "in-dash, touch-screen monitors"...
useless gimmicks, in my opinion. My next car will be a Ford (or a Chrysler 300 if my wife gets her way)- I grew up in Cleveland, and if our neighbors didn't work in the Chevy plant, they worked in the Ford plant. I cannot buy a new imported car- I just cannot bring myself to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Ford is right at the industry average, 116, without Lexus.
You throw out the freakishly low score of the boutique manufacturer, and that is the mean average. Somebody else can check my math.:dunce:

But if you somehow weighted these numbers to account for volume, or lack of it for some manufacturers, it might be interesting. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
14. One important thing to note
is that almost all cars now are more reliable (at least initially). I recently bought a car made by a company with a spotty reliability history, but I took a gamble and I haven't had a single issue yet with the car (almost on 10k miles). Granted, this particular car was on the JD's top three list for its respective category, but I think that company's overall placement is due to their quality problem at their Mexico plant.

I know another person with another car by a lower ranked company and it has done fine (no issues at around 10k miles).

All that said, I still couldn't see myself buying a current or recent Chrysler/Dodge (though I've heard decent things about the 300). I just don't like anything they have to offer.

I ultimately wouldn't be dissuaded from buying a Ford or certain GM models just due to this survey alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC