Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Federal Judge Throws Out President Obama's Drilling Rules

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 07:32 PM
Original message
Federal Judge Throws Out President Obama's Drilling Rules
Source: Associated Press

A judge on Friday threw out Obama administration rules that sought to slow down expedited environmental review of oil and gas drilling on federal land.

U.S. District Judge Nancy Freudenthal ruled in favor of a petroleum industry group, the Western Energy Alliance, in its lawsuit against the federal government, including Interior Secretary Ken Salazar.

The ruling reinstates Bush-era expedited oil and gas drilling under provisions called categorical exclusions on federal lands nationwide, Freudenthal said.

The government argued that oil and gas companies had no case because they didn't show how the new rules, implemented by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Forest Service last year, had created delays and added to the cost of drilling.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=14294717
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Now THIS is one where I expect them to appeal.. and FAST.
I hope they do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChandlerJr Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bad day in court
1st a Clinton appointed judge rules against the individual mandate and now one of Obama's own rules in favor of Big Oil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. Judges have no right to be Presidents. This is crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KT2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Expeditied review
should have been thrown out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Activist Judge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Obama appointee. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. When the next oil spill occurs I expect this judge to go out and help clean up n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IthinkThereforeIAM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-12-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. South Dakota is in the process of changing petroleum drilling oversight...
Edited on Fri Aug-12-11 08:37 PM by IthinkThereforeIAM
...got rid of the most experienced geologist (he left the job rather than be forced to move, took a private sector job for "twice the salary") and moved the other two with experience from their base near the oil developments in northwest South Dakota, to Vermillion in the extreme southeast and to Pierre in the middle of the state. That being said, they claim to have hired a mythical, "exprienced PhD" too come in and take oversight of regulatory set up and digitalization of records. of course, it is all due to, "budgetary constraints".

Sounds ripe for fraud to me. Dick Cheney and GW couldn't have hoped for a more dysfunctional oil situation to hop into.

So more bad news for the people and more favors for indiscriminate oil drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-13-11 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. The irony is that...the states most likely to be hurt are the ones who don't want...
environmental reviews. Those states make a lot of $$$ from drilling (I'm not knocking making money..but at what cost?), so they want more and more of it, expecting the rest of the country to "fix" the oil spill or other damage. Louisiana, too.

Thing is...the environment isn't contained by state boundaries. The part of the Gulf just south of Louisiana...if you spill there, it spreads to other parts of the Gulf. The environment belongs to us all, and to future generations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC