Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nato must extend stay: NTC

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jakeXT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 01:00 AM
Original message
Nato must extend stay: NTC
Source: The Peninsula

DOHA: Libya’s National Transitional Council has urged Nato to continue with its presence in the country saying that it fears that a defiant Colonel Muammar Ghadafi might do something unexpected.

Nato is mandated by the UN Security Council to stay in Libya until September 27.

Addressing a meeting of chiefs of staff of the armed forces of the countries that participated in anti-Gaddafi military operations in Libya, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, NTC Chairman, said yesterday that thanks to Nato large-scale massacre of civilians in his country was avoided.

“Libyan rebels couldn’t have achieved victory without the support of Nato and international alliance forces,” Jalil said.



Read more: http://www.thepeninsulaqatar.com/qatar/163189-nato-must-extend-stay-ntc.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
StarsInHerHair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Lies War & Empire at the link a very good article
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/

..."In early March of 2011, news headlines in Western nations reported that Gaddafi would kill half a million people.<1> On March 18, as the UN agreed to launch air strikes on Libya, it was reported that Gaddafi had begun an assault against the rebel-held town of Benghazi. The Daily Mail reported that Gaddafi had threatened to send in his African mercenaries to crush the rebellion.<2> Reports of Libyan government tanks sitting outside Benghazi poised for an invasion were propagated in the Western media.<3> In the lead-up to the United Nations imposing a no-fly zone, reports spread rapidly through the media of Libyan government jets bombing the rebels.<4> Even in February, the New York Times – the sacred temple for the ‘stenographers of power’ we call “journalists” – reported that Gaddafi was amassing “thousands of mercenaries” to defend Tripoli and crush the rebels.<5> Italy’s Foreign Minister declared that over 1,000 people were killed in the fighting in February, citing the number as “credible.”<6> Even a top official with Human Rights Watch declared the rebels to be “peaceful protesters” who “are nice, sincere people who want a better future for Libya.”<7> The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights declared that “thousands” of people were likely killed by Gaddafi, “and called for international intervention to protect civilians.”<8> In April, reports spread near and far at lightning speed of Gaddafi’s forces using rape as a weapon of war, with the first sentence in a Daily Mail article declaring, “Children as young as eight are being raped in front of their families by Gaddafi’s forces in Libya,” with Gaddafi handing out Viagra to his troops in a planned and organized effort to promote rape.<9>"...

"As it turned out, these claims – as posterity notes – turned out to be largely false and contrived. Doctors Without Borders and Amnesty International both investigated the claims of rape, and “have found no first-hand evidence in Libya that rapes are systematic and being used as part of war strategy,” and their investigations in Eastern Libya “have not turned up significant hard evidence supporting allegations of rapes by Qaddafi’s forces.” Yet, just as these reports came out, Hillary Clinton declared that the U.S. is “deeply concerned by reports of wide-scale rape” in Libya.<10> Even U.S. military and intelligence officials had to admit that, “there is no evidence that Libyan military forces are being given Viagra and engaging in systematic rape against women in rebel areas”; at the same time Susan Rice, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, “told a closed-door meeting of officials at the UN that the Libyan military is using rape as a weapon in the war with the rebels and some had been issued the anti-impotency drug. She reportedly offered no evidence to backup the claim.”<11>"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. NATO - the ultimate mercenary force
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bosonic Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. They love it when a plan comes together...
If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you're sitting on $$$$$, maybe you can hire... The NATO-Team.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Gaddafi would agree.
http://www.afriqueavenir.org/en/2011/08/15/gaddafi-exhorts-libyans-to-get-rid-of-“mercenaries”-and-nato/">Gaddafi exhorts Libyans to get rid of “mercenaries” and NATO
Libyan state-owned television Monday broadcast an address by Muammar Gaddafi in which he appealed to his people to take up arms and free the country of NATO “aggressors” and “mercenaries”.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Qaddafi might do something unexpected? You mean, like, WIN?
The rebels still seem mostly qualified to do end-zone dances and shoot mass quantities of ammo into the air.

They might "control" 99% of the country, but still need NATO air strikes and SAS ground support to make any progress.

So of course they will ask NATO to stay after "the rebels" have won the war. They'd be sitting ducks for any bad actors, including a few enclaves of Qaddafi supporters, to rise up and reverse "their" victory.

We'll be involved in an expensive nation-building exercise for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cstanleytech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Other than some ocassional overflights for intelligence support I think nato should
just stick to its plan to pull out, their not equipped to provide long term support and the people in libya need to learn to do it themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKDem08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-30-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. NATO: we will humanitarily bomb the shit out of you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-31-11 05:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. "Nato is mandated by the UN Security Council to stay in Libya until September 27."
I didn't see anything in the article to indicate that the NTC was asking NATO to stay longer than the date they are mandated to be there.

This from Juan Cole:

http://www.juancole.com/2011/08/what-the-un-can-and-cannot-do-for-libya.html

The new Libyan government has consistently rejected the idea of NATO troops, showing great wisdom. Yesterday the Voice of Free Libya in Benghazi “said that ‘the rebels are capable of preserving the security of his country and don’t need any foreign, Arab or Islamic forces to help preserving security in Libya.’”

Also from the BBC:

Libya's interim leaders reject UN military personnel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC