Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thomas, Kagan resist calls for recusal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:24 PM
Original message
Thomas, Kagan resist calls for recusal
Source: The Hill

Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Elena Kagan did not recuse themselves from deciding how to handle lawsuits over President Obama's healthcare law, despite activist groups’ calls for them to do so.

Conservative groups had called for Kagan to sit out the healthcare case because she was solicitor general when the solicitor general’s office began planning its legal defense of the healthcare law and its individual mandate. She had previously indicated, however, that she was unlikely to recuse herself from the case.

Liberal groups said Thomas should not take part in the case because his wife has profited from speeches and other work explicitly calling for Congress to repeal the reform law.

But neither was absent from Monday's announcement granting a hearing in the case filed by 26 states and the National Federation of Independent Business. The court’s practice is to list any recusals at this stage of the process, but it does not explicitly note or explain justices’ decisions to participate in a particular case.


Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/healthwatch/legal-challenges/193413-thomas-kagan-resist-calls-for-recusal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. They are the SUPREMES....and Above the Law! (we should know this by now) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. If Thomas doesn't sit out neither should Kagan
I know that neither of them should be there but if one decides to sit the other shouldn't be making any kind of "grand gesture" out of respectability or in order to be proper.

Ever since that prick William Rehnquist and maybe even before the Supreme Court has been nothing but a political tool and as long as dirtbags like Thomas and Scalia continue to infest it I say we need to do anything to blunt them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. if Thomas AND Fat Tony sit after their fundraiser with lawyers for the repeal
so should Kagan

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. They will just cancel each other's vote out anyway.
So it will be up to the rest of the seven to decide the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-14-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why is this country such a hypocritical farce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. because it plays well on the tv machine. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Because voters are stupid enough to keep voting for the most heavily advertised candidates...
...who are incumbents who represent the interests of big money and entrenched power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. because of the legalized bribery of lobbying and campaign donations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kagan and Thomas face political pressure to sit out health reform case
Source: msnbc.com's Michael O'Brien

Political groups are applying pressure to two of the U.S. Supreme Court's nine justices before they hear a series of cases challenging the constitutionality of President Obama's signature health reform law.

Conservative groups want to prevent Justice Elena Kagan from being among the members of the court to decide the case, which the justices announced on Monday they would hear this term. And liberal groups, similarly, want Justice Clarence Thomas to recuse himself from the case.

Their demands reflect the gamesmanship surrounding the case, which would either offer legal vindication for Obama's law, or hand Republicans a victory in dismantling it -- at the height of the election season, no less, since a decision is due in June.

Republicans have already demanded that Kagan sit out the case because of her work as solicitor general in the Obama administration during the fight over the health care law. Utah Sen. Orrin Hatch (R), a longtime staple of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has demanded that she recuse herself, and House Republicans have sought to probe the extent of her involvement in crafting the legal defense for the law.

Read more: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/15/8820711-kagan-and-thomas-face-political-pressure-to-sit-out-health-reform-case



What about Scalia?
Scalia and Thomas dine with healthcare law challengers as court takes case
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. what about Scalia?
why aren't they talking about that whore?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yes, why no pressure on Scalia?

Hopefully it will come, now that the news is out about the dinner...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left on green only Donating Member (270 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes, Scabula sitting with his greasy hair slicked back while taking a lap dance
from Bancroft PLLC. I guess he was just happy to see 'em. Nazis in Chico?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Scalia wrote some decisions that would, if followed, SUPPORT Obama's health plan.
So he's a real wild card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-15-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. The good thing is that it is Justice Kagan's call whether to recuse or not. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC