Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The revenge of the CIA

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:15 PM
Original message
The revenge of the CIA
~snip~
At the State Department and at the CIA, they're finally starting to swing some punches his way," said the former adviser. "When it comes to Chalabi, they've been saying for years 'not to be trusted'."

On the BBC's The World Tonight on Friday, Christopher Dickie, a journalist who has known Mr Chalabi for 20 years, said: "I interviewed Ahmed about some of the controversy surrounding him. I said: 'Look, a lot of people in the CIA and the State Department say you would do anything to drag the USA into a war with Saddam Hussein'. He looked me in the eye and he said: 'Yes. Absolutely.' "

Only a year ago, after the apparently triumphant race of US troops to Baghdad, Mr Rumsfeld was the superstar of the Bush administration, voted by People magazine as one of the "sexiest men alive". Mr Wolfowitz was acknowledged as its pre-eminent intellect.

Not any more. The Sunday Telegraph has learnt that the Pentagon was not even consulted by the top US civilian in Iraq, Mr Bremer, before last week's raid on the home of its former protege, although a meeting was held involving both State Department officials and the National Security Council.

~snip~
more: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/05/23/wirq223.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/05/23/ixnewstop.html
many interesting tidbits in this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Brett Stanton Donating Member (6 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a clusterfuck
the Pentagon was not even consulted by the top US civilian in Iraq, Mr Bremer, before last week's raid on the home of its former protege

What the hell is going on over there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Your guess as good as anybody else's. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Office of Special Plans.....created by Cheney and Wolfie po'd the CIA
A sense of schadenfreude is palpable. In 2002, CIA officials were humiliated by the creation, in the heart of the Department of Defence, of a rival centre of intelligence-gathering, the so-called Office of Special Plans.

Created by Paul Wolfowitz, with the blessing of the Vice-President, Dick Cheney, the OSP soon rivalled the CIA as Mr Bush's main source of information concerning Iraq's possible weapons of mass destruction. Its very existence was intended as a damning indictment of CIA intelligence-gathering techniques.

"Cheney and Wolfowitz thought the CIA far too conservative," said a Pentagon adviser.

"It was seen as too cautious." An internal Pentagon memorandum of the time even suggested that intelligence efforts to date had "downplayed or sought to disprove" a possible link between al-Qaeda and Iraq.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacifictiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. some have been hinting that STATE dept
was behind the raid. Payback time for these many months of being sidelined by the defense dept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. I'm beginning to feel like a parent away on vacation calling home and
finding out the kids are wrecking the house.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sentath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. I'm still at that point in the call where
you can hear odd noises in the background, and you know that your credit card shouldn't have been declined, but you haven't quite figured out whats going on entirely...

{rlg}

Disclaimer: I'm not a parent, but I am older than my single sibling by 11 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Bremer doesn't have control over the troops, does he?
How did we get both U.S. and Iraqis conducting the raid?

I thought Rumsfeld was lying yesterday morning (or whenever it was) when he said he knew nothing about it. Apparently not???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. US government has started to isolate Bush and the Neo-Cons
Basically, Bush and the Neo-Cons are not working for America's interests, and the rest of the government is starting to act accordingly. I guess?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #20
43. Karma is a perfect justice system!
I pray they will get as they gave, and tenfold!!!
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exploited Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
25. Why consult with the Pentagon?
The Pentagon staff can't even protect their own building from an "aircraft" despite an hours worth of warning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #25
30. remember the airliner hit the reinforced section...
the pentagon was undergoing fixing/strengthening and apparently the crash site was the part which best withstood the disaster....
one of the peculiarities of 911 that just aches for some explanation- whoever did it '911' wanted fewest casualties within reason (i recall guliani saying there were 10thousand people trapped in each tower...so 20thousand dead w/out including people on the planes!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. I had kind of the same take on the WTC
I was kind of shame to think that way, but you can bet money some on Wall Street think the same way. You did notice what part of New York they crashed into, also, I am sure.

We poor people never called for class warfare, but just look how some are want to prepare to fight such things.

I still remember the story my father told about he and his brothers waking up in the morning,looking for toys on Christmas day, during the depression. They finding none, rounded ups some cockroaches and hitched them up with string after they found some little thrown away match boxes. Made their own toys and had some fun little chariot races with them.

The poor suffer the most durring economic downturns, but taking down the haughty beligerance by elitest is of consequnce that also gets put in the equation.

http://www.awitness.org/journal/great_depression.html
The Great Depression.
George Bush vs Einstein on economic policy

According to the mathematician, Albert Einstein, the policies of George Bush are likely to result in another Great Depression. To quote a recurring quip, 'I know George Bush, and let me tell you, George Bush is no Albert Einstein.'

During a recent press conference, a reporter asked Ari Fleischer if the President believed that ‘deficits did not matter', given the huge size of the tax cuts pushed through in this administration. The press Secretary replied that the President believed that his tax cut proposal was the best way to ‘create jobs'. At the present time the Republican Administration is pushing these tax cuts as an ‘economic stimulus package' as well as a measure to ‘create jobs'. Here we have an old policy being dressed up in new propaganda. The policy has not changed but the sales pitch certainly has.

(snip)
Essentially what happened in the 1920's was that there was an oversupply of goods. It was not that the surplus products of industrialized society were not wanted, but rather that those whose needs were not satiated could not afford more, whereas the wealthy were satiated by spending only a small portion of their income. A 1932 article in Current History articulates the problems of this maldistribution of wealth ... One obvious solution to the problem of the vast majority of the population not having enough money to satisfy all their needs was to let those who wanted goods buy products on credit. The concept of buying now and paying later caught on quickly. By the end of the 1920's 60% of cars and 80% of radios were bought on installment credit. Between 1925 and 1929 the total amount of outstanding installment credit more than doubled from $1.38 billion to around $3 billion. Installment credit allowed one to "telescope the future into the present", as the President's Committee on Social Trends noted. This strategy created artificial demand for products which people could not ordinarily afford. It put off the day of reckoning, but it made the downfall worse when it came.

Mass speculation went on throughout the late 1920's. In 1929 alone, a record volume of 1,124,800,410 shares were traded on the New York Stock Exchange. From early 1928 to September 1929 the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose from 191 to 381. This sort of profit was irresistible to investors. Company earnings became of little interest; as long as stock prices continued to rise huge profits could be made.
(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
37. What is going on in the US is a better question.
There is little we can do about what is going on in Iraq, but a lot we can do here at home like getting information out to people we know and getting more people to vote against Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yup. Hey,...he was a neocon's best friend *LOL*!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gp Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. A video link to BBC Hardtalk interview with *PoS* Chalabi
Edited on Sat May-22-04 08:55 PM by bobdole
its from a couple of weeks ago

Where chalabi literally says "They (referring to David Kay and United States in general) were so dumb as to believe in our con game"...

its about 7:30 min into the interview


RealVideo
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/cta/progs/04/hardtalk/chalabi08apr.ram

related article here
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/hardtalk/3612111.stm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. That quote is taken out of context
I listened to the whole response, and he was projecting as to what he thought David Kay's thoughts must be. He also clearly says "He (David Kay) is saying that, not I. I say that we provided inteliigence in good faith."

I still think he's a lying piece of shit, but it's not fair to take the quote out of context.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Thanks for the video of Chalabi
I must say that was one of the best interviews I've seen in a long time.

Wish our American ladies could interview like that Brit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gp Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. LOL

"Elsewhere, to King Abdullah of Jordan, Mr Bush remarked: "You can piss on Chalabi."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
7. Failure
"According to one retired general: "We've gone from 'failure is not an option' to failure, of some kind, being the only option."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #7
26. Failure is not an option; it's standard equipment on a Neo-convertible
We are just the stupidest cornfed hayseeds to ever walk into town in a plaid suit. The very idea of announcing our blockheaded need to beat the tar out of this country will just make our failure more complete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightperson Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. Here's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. yes, the article points out it's also top military turning on bushco*
Instead, the New York Post editorial inadvertently pointed out one, but by no means all, of the major sources for Hersh's information. The editorial alleged that Hersh had received much of his material from the CIA.

Based on the material Hersh quoted, his legendary intelligence community contacts were probably sources for some of his information. However, Hersh has also enjoyed close personal relations with many now high-ranking officers in the United States Army, going all the way back to his prize-winning coverage and scoops in Vietnam more than 30 years ago.

Indeed, intelligence and regular Army sources have told UPI that senior officers and officials in both communities are sickened and outraged by the revelations of mass torture and abuse, and also by the incompetence involved, in the Abu Ghraib prison revelations. These sources also said that officials all the way up to the highest level in both the Army and the Agency are determined not to be scapegoated, or allow very junior soldiers or officials to take the full blame for the excesses.

~snip~

But what enrages many serving senior Army generals and U.S. top-level intelligence community professionals is that the "few" in this case were not primarily the serving soldiers who were actually encouraged to carry out the abuses and even then take photos of the victims, but that they were encouraged to do so, with the Army's well-established safeguards against such abuses deliberately removed by high-level Pentagon civilian officials.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DEMVET-USMC Donating Member (789 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Civilian prison official for Abu Ghraib appointed by John Ashcroft
The New York Times: May 21, 2004: page A 10 by Fox Butterfield and Eric Lichtblau "SCREENING OF PRISON OFFICIALS IS FAULTED BY LAWMAKERS": On into the article it is noted that : Lane McCotter was dispatched by Mr. Ashcroft to head a team of Americans to reopen Iraq`s prisons. Lane McCotter was forced to resign as Director of the Utah Department of Corrections in 1997 due to cruelty resulting in death. He then created his own PRIVATE PRISON COMPANY one of who`s jails was strongly criticized in a justice Dept. report just a month before the JUSTICE DEPARTMENT sent him to Iraq. Keep in mind Ashcroft is head of the justice department. It seems Mr. Ashcroft does not event pay any any heed to his own Department`s judgement. This is powerful stuff. If it were not for one scandal after another coming to the fore it would surely be getting some significant attention. It seems Mr. Goodie two shoes Ashcroft`s Christian beliefs do not stand in his way of appointing a documented prisoner abuser to head up prison affairs in Iraq. Please some help from you more savvy web users to get a link on this article. ...Oscar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Here we go
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/21/politics/21PRIS.html

You will need to register. It is free and relatively painless.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. fyi, about registering
http://www.bugmenot.com/

If people have privacy issues with registering at a site, this place will help you bypass by giving you the info for an existing account.

And while I'm at it, this site is good for a one time, disposable email address to avoid spam:
http://www.mailinator.com/mailinator/Welcome.do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. I don't worry about spam, or pop ups. They're blocked.
as far as the government, I have had a file on me since 65, so my privacy has been in the shit can for nearly 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keithyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. I hope they sock it to Richard Perle while they are at it.
He is on a one man campaign to smear the CIA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsMagnificent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
15. Can anyone provide link to NY Post article/editorial re: Hersch?
New York Post published an article or editorial trying (but failing, so I hear) to discredit Sy Hersch == I Googled for it but could not find.
Would any have a link or copy they could please send me?

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightperson Donating Member (550 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Here it
Edited on Sat May-22-04 10:00 PM by secondtermdenier
is, with the usual warning that Hamilton's ancient institution that gave us "Headless Body Found In Topless Bar" is currently a neocon "Mighty Wurlitzer".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Here's my take on the situation:
I read that when Karl Rove or Scooter Libby leaked the name of Valerie Plame to the press, the CIA declared war on the Bush Administration. They were going to get revenge, no matter how long it took.

Of course, there was the small matter of Cheney creating his own "mini-CIA" which would distort the facts and concoct fairy tales, just for Mr. Cheney & Bush.

It also seemed to me that George Tenet had a sly smile on his face when he had to go testify before a closed-door committee meeting after the niger uranium scandal last summer.

It's also true that the CIA had been warning BushCo about Chalabi. I just read the entire article (25 pages! whew) on CounterPunch yesterday. Man, what a sleezy slime that Ahmed really is.

The BeelzeBush administration, however, ignored the facts and and "stood by their man". So now, Chalabi's about to get flushed down the toilet because he was planning a coup of his own in Iraq, and the US government deemed him a "hot potato" so he has to go.

In the meantime, I would not by any means say that the CIA has gotten its revenge. I think they haven't even begun to fight.

Give them some more time.....they'll get "their due" like Cheney said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. do you have a link to the counterpunch article cliss?
thank you :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundancekid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. was wondering the same thing, and I found it -- see link below
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. And the only other man we hear about is a cleric... and it's May 22.
So that leaves ta da ta da....Negroponte and his 3000 person staff!

Ambassador, ah, I mean, President, ah Ambassador, make that Resident?

Or, is Iraq really a new state? And Negroponte its Governor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Must_B_Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
27. Mr Rumsfeld People magazine, one of the "sexiest men alive".
who knew at the time what kind of sex he was in to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
29. When Conservatives Attack
Edited on Sun May-23-04 08:36 AM by muriel_volestrangler
being conservative, the Telegraph probably has some good contacts with administration officials. I loved this:

The judgements are harsh, but these are febrile days in the capital. Infighting over Iraq within the Bush administration and on Capitol Hill has reached such a pitch and ferocity that, according to one official within the Coalition Provisional Authority, Washington DC is now referred to as "Sunni Triangle, West".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngGale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #29
41. 'Sunni Triangle, West,' I love that part and...
from what I hear, it's not going to end until Bush is out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
32. Has anyone noticed that we are almost at the 60th anniversary...
of July 20th, 1944?

A disclaimer: while I hate GWB, I think that violence is reprehensible, and destabilizing. But I'm not crying at the thought of his dethroning being accomplished by a slow leakage of pictures, and a free and fair election.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Hi pacoyogi!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
33. It should be noted that Salem Chalabi (Ahmed's nephew) was the Iraqi
that had authority for "contractors" approved to do reconstruction "business" in Iraq.

Friends of the Family
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1048205,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. wasn't he also the one who signed the warrant for al-Sadr
not sure :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrBB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
39. Goodness, I hope this doesn't mean Rummy will lose his spot on
...the list of "sexiest men alive." That'd be a terrible price to pay for a little peccadillo like royally fucking up the stupidest invasion in US history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matilda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-04 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. I noticed that little aside too.
I wonder what their criterion was? Some people just get easily
excited, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crossroads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-24-04 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
42. The Bush cartel is imploding!
Kerry has to do nothing but stand aside and watch these evil lying crooks destroy themselves! Just hope he can repair the damage they have done to the reputation of the US in the eyes of the world!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC