Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rights Activists Assail Pentagon Guantanamo Moves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 06:34 PM
Original message
Rights Activists Assail Pentagon Guantanamo Moves
Edited on Thu Jul-08-04 06:42 PM by G_j
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=domesticNews&storyID=5624160

Rights Activists Assail Pentagon Guantanamo Moves

Thu Jul 8, 2004 05:25 PM ET


By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Human rights activists demanded on Thursday that the United States give lawyers access to Guantanamo prisoners, and criticized an internal process devised by the Pentagon for these foreign terrorism suspects to contest whether they are being held lawfully.

The Pentagon said on Wednesday a newly created tribunal of three U.S. military officers will conduct hearings to permit all of the approximately 594 prisoners held at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to challenge their status as an "enemy combatant" rather than prisoner of war.

The announcement came in response to the Supreme Court's June 28 ruling that Guantanamo prisoners have the right to use U.S. courts to challenge their confinement.

But the Pentagon said Guantanamo prisoners cannot have a lawyer for the tribunal hearings, and that unspecified security and other arrangements must be resolved before detainees can have access to lawyers for court challenges to their imprisonment.

..more..


--
related:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=672367&mesg_id=672367

Pentagon accused of evading Guantánamo ruling

Suzanne Goldenberg in Washington and Vikram Dodd
Thursday July 8, 2004

The Guardian

The Pentagon said last night it would create military review panels to weigh the legality of detentions at Guantánamo, in a measure that critics said falls far short of a supreme court ruling that entitles prisoners to challenge their detentions in US courts.
In the Bush administration's first response to last week's sweeping court verdict, senior military and justice department officials told reporters yesterday that the Pentagon would establish military pan els to review the detention of each of the 595 prisoners.

The four Britons in Guantánamo Bay have not been told of a ruling, the Guardian has learned.

They are among prisoners held at the prison camp without charge, trial or access to lawyers for up to 2 years.

The revelation will also put pressure on the British government to tell its citizens of the ruling when officials visit the prison camp. The Blair government risks another clash with its closest ally over the Guantánamo issue if the US refuses to allow UK officials to tell the Britons of their new rights.

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BattyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
The announcement came in response to the Supreme Court's June 28 ruling that Guantanamo prisoners have the right to use U.S. courts to challenge their confinement.


Since when is a military tribunal a "US Court"? :grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Since Bush it seems
I'm not an expert on how these things work, but it doesn't sound too Kosher to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imperialism Inc. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-08-04 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well I guess we know now whether the Supreme Court ruling
was a win or a loss for justice. Justice lost big big time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. now more lawsuits will have to be filed I guess
will this make back to the Supreme Court again? I sincerely doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC