Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Proof Bush Completed Military Service

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:24 AM
Original message
No Proof Bush Completed Military Service
http://www.wbex.com/script/headline_newsmanager.php?id=327365&pagecontent=nationalnews&feed_id=59

Payroll records that could help prove President Bush completed all his military service in the Texas Air National Guard have been accidently destroyed.

The Pentagon says the payroll records of numerous service members, including former First Lt. George W. Bush, were ruined in 1996 and 1997 by the Defense Finance and Accounting Service while trying to salvage deteriorating microfilm, the New York Times reported Friday.

No paper copies could be found, it added in notices dated June 25.

A Denver spokesman for the service said the destruction occurred as the office was trying to unspool 2,000-foot rolls of fragile microfilm. That spokesman also said he did not know how many records were lost or why the loss had not been announced before.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lovedems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. 1996 and 1997.
Isn't that about the time questions starting being raised about his military service? When did he start his run for Governor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. I believe the questions came up before
1996 'goobernatorial' election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gosh
What a terrible coincidence that was. I'm sure if all those records had not been accidentally destroyed they would have proven that Bush was valiantly defending Texas and Alabama from a sneak VietCong air attack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Accidentally destroyed???
(accidentally on purpose....)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. isn't it illegal to destroy government property?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. If Gov't Records Are "Accidentally" Destroyed Then A Report On It
must (or should) exist somewhere.

I can't believe that if something like this happens, especially to military records, that those responsible weren't OBLIGATED to fill out some sort of official report about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Anyone who digs on this will de DESTROYED by the Imperial Family.
It's just a matter of HOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihaveaquestion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. 3 words - Social Security Records
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. You're Right
It will show what he made, but I don't think it will specifically list his military pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihaveaquestion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. They know where you earned what. Every employer has a code.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
20. But
Wouldn't specific information like that be covered under the Privacy Act?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. Today's Lesson: The Advantages Of Microfilm
Longest lasting medium available with a 100+ year life expectancy.

A microfilm image has been for decades, and still is, a certified legal copy of a document, once the original is gone (the standard practice in micrographics is to destroy the documents once they have been microfilmed).

To this day, it is virtually impossible, or at least cost prohibitive, to alter a microfilm image in a way that is undetectable.


I covered this extensively in my blog this morning:
(Scroll Down)
http://ascrivenerslament.blogspot.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. There Are So Many Holes In This Story It's Inexcusable For The Press
to be just reporting what they are told by the admin. Why don't they interview microfilm experts, etc. for their take on the story? (rhetorical)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaoar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. How can microfilm be destroyed
Moisture, mold, poor storage techniques?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demonaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. not only that even if it was damaged unspooling only fire
or caustic chemicals would destroy the film, almost all if not all could be savalged and be copied on a one to one transfer to new film similar to a contact sheet. this is bullshit, as a former military photographer I've handled most films and understand the preservation and salvage process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. What A Great Headline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
24. Took me a while to find it. But I did n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. Now, wait a gosh-darn minute!
Edited on Fri Jul-09-04 11:01 AM by Angel_O_Peace
Weren't there previous news reports that Bush's payroll records PROVED he had been active in the service??? I remember reading those articles when the hoopla began when questioning FratBoy's military records.
Am heading to google to check it out...meanwhile, anyone have those article links?

on edit:
Some links:
http://www.awolbush.com/kerry-vs-bush.asp

AND

http://www.factcheck.org/MiscReports.aspx?docID=142
<snip>
And in fact, Bush was at Dannelly Air National Guard base in Montgomery as late as Jan. 6, 1973, according to a document released by the White House Feb. 11. The document is a record of a dental examination of Bush on that date. The payroll records released two days earlier show Bush received pay and credit for service for Jan. 6 and for five other days closely clustered between Jan. 4 and Jan. 10.

AND

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/2/10/134542.shtml

<snip>
WASHINGTON – The White House, facing election-year questions about President Bush's military service, released pay records and other information Tuesday that it said supports Bush's assertion that he fulfilled his duty as a member of the Air National Guard during the Vietnam War.
The material included annual retirement point summaries and pay records to show that Bush served.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
luaneryder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. Why were they unspooling it
unless they were looking for something specific? Like *'s record.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colonel odis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
17. so bush can't prove he completed his national guard service
instead, he'd like us to take his word for it.

roflmao!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
18. Payroll records WERE used to prove service
Edited on Fri Jul-09-04 11:04 AM by Angel_O_Peace
A :kick:
See my above post for articles that state the WH used Bush's payroll records to prove military service. AHA!

More WH lies re: payroll records "destroyed" in the 90s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. Hey, didn't shrub say the records were destroyed in a fire?
Like, a year ago? Oh, I see, the tech opened the 'fragile' microfilm, accidentally breaking off large sections and then dropped it accidentally into the shredder that just happened to be on at the time. After removing the mess from the shredder, he panicked and started running with the 2,000 feet of shredded microfilm, accidentally knocking over a Bunsen Burner that happened to be on at the time, setting fire to the pile of newspapers that his boss had been bugging him to take out to the trash. "I was just havin' a really bad day" the tech later reported.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
22. another amazing $hrubco co-inky-dink....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. Here is how The Guardian reported this latest BFEE outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ignatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
25. Man, Bush must be the luckiest guy
Edited on Fri Jul-09-04 11:27 AM by ignatius
on the face of the earth. Any problems concerning him just seem to disappear like magic. There is no situation too slimy or sorry that his money, connections, and intimidation tactics can't solve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
26. Obtaining Your DD214
DD214
Proof of Service

The DD 214 is the most common type of proof of service. It has been issued to veterans discharged from all branches of service since January 1, 1950.

There are three critical information areas on the DD 214 . . .
The Veteran's Identification
The Veteran's Information
And the Character of Service

Identification Information on the DD 214 is found in
Item 1: Veteran's name when in the Service . . .
Item 3: Social Security Number . . . and
Item 5: Date of Birth

The Service Information provided in Item 2 indicates the component or Branch of Service a Veteran served in.

Service Information in Item 12 indicates the entry date, separation date and net active service of the Veteran. This information is used in the Eligibility Process.

The Character of Service is given in Item 24. The Characters of Service are:
Dishonorable
Bad Conduct
General (Gen)
Other than Honorable (OTH)
Under Honorable Conditions (UHC)

DD214s issued after October 1, 1979 include this information on the Member 4 copy, which is required for the Eligibility process.

Older DD214s contain most of the same information. The Veteran's name, service number (separate service numbers were assigned prior to the use of social security numbers), and date of birth are found in Items 1, 2 and 6.

A major difference with older DD214s is that the active service period: Item 24, may not include any lost time. Lost Time is included in Item 32: Remarks and is accounted for separately when calculating the time in service.

The DD214 also identifies the component or branch a veteran served in. This can either be a regular component of the military such as Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines or Coast Guard or a reserve component such as Air National Guard, Army National Guard, Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Air Force Reserve, Marine Reserve or Coast Guard.

DD215

The DD 215 is issued to correct any wrong information on a DD214. When a veteran submits VA Form 26-1880, both the DD214 and the DD215 must be included.

Obtaining Your DD214

To obtain a copy of your DD 214, you will need to submit Standard Dorm 180: Request Pertaining to Military Records to the:

National Personnel Records Center
Military Personnel Records
9700 Page Avenue
St. Louis, MO 63132-5100

There are several ways to obtain Standard Form (SF) 180.

You may download the form at http://www.nara.gov/regional/mprsf180.html

You may also call the Fax-on-Demand System at (301) 713 - 6905. This system makes brochures, informational sheets and other documents available to the public who have access to fax machines. The SF 180 is available as document number 2255.

Or you may call the National Records Personnel Center telephone information lines:
(snip)
http://www.valaro.com/lgy/coe/id49.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-04 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
27. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC