Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lynne, Dick Cheney Differ on Gay Marriage

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 03:42 PM
Original message
Lynne, Dick Cheney Differ on Gay Marriage
WASHINGTON - Lynne Cheney, the vice president's wife and mother of a lesbian, said Sunday that states should have the final say over the legal status of personal relationships.


That stand puts her at odds with the vice president on the need for the constitutional amendment now under debate in the Senate that effectively would ban gay marriage.


"I think that the constitutional amendment discussion will give us an opportunity to look for ways to discuss ways in which we can keep the authority of the states intact," Cheney told CNN's "Late Edition."


The Senate began debate Friday on an amendment that defines marriage as a union of a man and woman as husband and wife.

more....
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&e=4&u=/ap/20040711/ap_on_el_pr/cheneys_gay_marriage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kipepeo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. This was Dick Cheney's position too
until recently I guess (recently meaning when Bush decided to run on the FMA).

In 2000 Cheney said, "That matter is regulated by the states. I think different states are likely to come to different conclusions, and that's appropriate. I don't think there should necessarily be a federal policy in this area."


the Log Cabin Republicans have some ads with him saying this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Ugh...
For the first time in the history of our nation we are about to let these mandate-less, dishonourable political hacks get their petty dirty greedy neocon RW paws on the people's most sacred document to write discrimination INTO IT!

It's a testament to this crowd's pure political tunnel vision really, they have no sense of history or respect for our nation's institutions.

I heard the primate in chief this weekend in his radio address say that marriage is the fundamental building block of our society, and it must be preserved. What sort of bubble is this man living in? If the rise or fall of our republic was based solely on the preservation of the "conventional" heterosexual marriage, it would have collapsed long ago. Divorce, infidelity, sexual abuse, the list goes on! And now the vast majority of hetero marriages are ending in divorce as well.

Not to mention there's evidence that shrub has cheated on his wife. What's a greater threat to marriage, a man and man or woman and woman uniting in a loving lifetime bond, or, a drunk abusive failed businessman husband that dubya was? Or his brother and all his scandalous problems that have never made it into the mainstream news in any great regard. (Asian hookers anyone? "they just showed up!") i rest my case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ediacara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good points!
and welcome to DU! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichV Donating Member (858 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, one thing I'd keep in mind
This amendment doesn't have a chance to pass. They may not even get a majority. Won't even be close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That's it exactly
I heard an excerpt from Stupidhead's weekly radio address this morning on the local news. He was babbling some nonsense about how the issue of gay marriage has been "forced" on the nation because of activist local politicians and judges.

Apparently Stupidhead has forgotten (or hoped that we had forgotten) that the whole issue started because the Reactionary Right thought it had an easy win with the issue of gay marriage. What they actually did was arouse a somnambulent population of gays and their supporters who wanted little more than to be left alone. When they started meddling in people's lives, they found out that their easy picking of some low-hanging fruit (no pun intended) turned out to be so much sour grapes.

My own Senator Gordon Smith has come out in favor of the constitutional amendment. At least one of his constituents will let him know that he's making a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. no; what they wanted is to force dems
to vote against it, then have their vote as a nail to hammer upon in subsequent campaigns

two prime examples of that tactic, aren't there?

don't they both happen to be running in a somewhat high profile campaign this year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. They're certainly using the issue to partisan advantage -- now
But the issue originally came up because the Reactionary Right thought it could hammer a powerless minority with few friends, and score political points pandering to their base. They miscalculated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
True_Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Welcome to DU!
I've yet to hear them give a concrete and precise example of how gay marriages will impact heterosexual marriages.

Bush doesn't really care about gay marriages, he just wants everyone, especially his Christian Base, to think about gay marriage instead of the eight hundred plus American men and women who gave their lives for this poorly thought-out, pre-emptive, illegal war in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Hello everyone!
:hi:

I've been browsing the boards for some time, finally decided i HAD to join!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenergy Donating Member (834 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Welcome Nation!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Honestly, I do not care what she says. She is nothing
and I do not care what he says. He is a liar without any sense of what it means to have a heart and tell the truth.

I am not interested in this dysfunctional family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geo55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. The wisdom of the Founding Fathers
shines again...
It's a tough nut to crack to get where they want to go.
http://www.trumanlibrary.org/whistlestop/teacher_lessons/3branches/15b.htm

the framers of the consitution forsaw this doo doo comin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sundog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sounds like bait with a hook in it...
they're waving in front of some naive fishes

phony as hell... so the masses say "well, they're not so bad" or "maybe they're compassionate after all" -- I don't believe anything that comes out of any mouths from the right.

Their true position was made clear yesterday by the bigot in chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
12. crooked people, crooked picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2cents Donating Member (522 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. Uh-oh That's It !!
Dicky's gonna get the sock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItsMyParty Donating Member (835 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Same garbage, different day
Dear heaven---recognize ugly, manipulative politics when you see it. It's the same garbage pulled by Papa Bush. Good Cop-Bad Cop. George railed against abortion (though he was okay with it until he ran for president and they told him it's the way to win the morons of the Christian right) and Barbie said she was for it. They animals always paly the retro card...of it worked before, do it again. So now Dick (people are hating you) Cheney rails against gay marriage to play to the bigotted minions, then Mama Cheney tries to play to the center. And you know what really sucks? Neither one of them could give a rat's ass about whether gay's marry or not. In fact, if they could find a way to make billions off of gay marriages, they would be out promoting gay marriage 24 hours a day!!! These people are soooooo predictable. And such unholy scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. yup... who cares what the wives think...
they have no real power in this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredScuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. Lynne Fuck is beyond belief
What kind of mother doesn't beat the drums to protect her child? What kind of mother allows her husband to espouse such hatred against their child?

Lynne Fuck is a motherCheneyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rob-ok-vin Donating Member (75 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-11-04 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. Its about getting the Christian Right motivated.
I know here in Okla they are trying to get a vote for a state Constitutional Ammendment on the ballot for Nov. You think they want the Baptist to vote in force? And it is also my Sen Inhofe that is co-sponsoring the senate bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. Should Dickie Boy haul Lynne in front of Judge Holmes?

If she's not doing as told, does she need an afternoon in the ducking stool?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hobarticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-04 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. "Keep the authority of the states intact'?!?
Did she really say that?

I don't see how discussing the constitutional amendment discussion will "keep the authority of the states intact". Think the way to do that is for the fed to drop the issue altogether, and let the states decide.

Lynne, do the right thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC