Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Martin to make decision on missile defence: report (Canada)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 09:16 AM
Original message
Martin to make decision on missile defence: report (Canada)
Martin to make decision on missile defence: report

OTTAWA - Days after his June 28 election win, Prime Minister Paul Martin discussed Canada's role in the U.S. missile defence program, said Paul Cellucci, the U.S. ambassador to Canada.

...

The Prime Minister's Office says Martin gave no assurance on timing, but added that cabinet will decide on the program before October when Washington's first missile interceptors will be in place in Alaska and California.

...

Even if the vote goes before Parliament, the parties likely to support missile defence – the Liberals and Conservatives – have three times as many MPs as the NDP and Bloc Québécois put together.

"There seems to be a Liberal support and Conservative support for making sure that defence spending is a priority," said Cellucci.
http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2004/07/12/missile_canada040712

Participation seen as a near certainty

OTTAWA—Just days after the federal election, Prime Minister Paul Martin informed American officials he would soon decide whether Canada will join the U.S.-led missile defence program.

Sources on both sides of the border indicate privately that Canadian participation is seen as a near certainty, and a government Web site has already begun extolling the benefits of the missile shield.

...

Martin spent much of the election campaign dismissing NDP suggestions that the missile defence program would turn space into a weapons zone.

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1089583810001&call_pageid=968332188774&col=968350116467&tacodalogin=no

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Screaming Lord Byron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. He'll sign on, it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. I wish someone would tell Celluci to go suck an egg...
that man is an embarrassment to his country and constantly interferes with the internal affairs of Canada. I despise him!

Now, to be on topic, I hope Martin stalls till the last possible moment, looks at the polls that will show bush is out in Nov and then says "stuff it" to him. That's my hope but I don't expect that to happen, sadly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's like Bremer, without the army boots.
A graceless thug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Douglas Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. Just say no Paul...
Look at the election. Canadians made their displeasure known to you. Your government hangs by a thread. Hiding behind missles will never make us free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed! The only thing that pulled Martin's "fat out of the fire" was...
the faux Conservatives were pro-bush, pro-Iraq invasion and occupation and Canadians did NOT want that so chose Martin or the NDP. The message was crystal clear, imo. Anything bush wants from Canada should receive a resounding NO from our government. When Kerry is President, that is the time for repairing our relationship, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. You mean that money suck up program to defend us from that country
Edited on Tue Jul-13-04 12:01 PM by Massacure
That collapsed back in 1991? Oh yea! I completely forgot about them. Why do we need to defend ourselves against them again?

I hope Martin says "NO!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Twenty years later -- it's STILL a scam! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC