Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On the phone with Ralph Nader

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
UGABrother Donating Member (83 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:26 AM
Original message
On the phone with Ralph Nader
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 12:40 AM by UGABrother
From Salon.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------
July 14, 2004 | Last Friday, Ralph Nader's campaign spokesman Kevin Zeese e-mailed Salon, saying that Nader wanted to speak with Salon editor David Talbot "about recent articles that have appeared in Salon concerning him and his candidacy." The following is a transcript of the ensuing three-way phone conversation among Nader, Zeese and Talbot. It ranged over Rupert Murdoch (whose company published Nader's new book), Democratic "dirty tricks" against the independent candidate's presidential bid, and Nader's acceptance of conservative money and support.

Nader opened the conversation by charging that Salon had not solicited a response from him when preparing two recent critical pieces about him -- "The Dark Side of Ralph Nader," by Lisa Chamberlain, and "Strange Alliance," by Eric Boehlert. For the record, Chamberlain made repeated phone calls to Nader's campaign office and Zeese's cellphone seeking a comment from Nader or his spokesman but received no replies. And Boehlert spoke to Zeese on the phone, quoting him in his piece.

Nader: Why didn't your reporters call for a response?

Talbot: They did.

Nader: Since was writing about the campaign, wouldn't you have the decency to call our campaign office?

Talbot: It's always Salon's procedure, whenever we do a critical article on anyone -- whether it's the Bush administration or you or anyone -- to give them a chance to respond. That's always our policy.

Nader: Look, I've been in journalism too, and when I was doing a critical piece on someone, I would call.

Talbot: Look, Ralph, I'm just not buying your premise that our reporter didn't try to reach you. Someone in your organization is not giving you the right information...

Nader: Wait, wait, wait! No, I'm telling you, if you make a call and you don't get through, and you're not working under deadline because you're working on the damned thing for three or four weeks, you write a letter. You write a letter! That's what I do. You write a letter!

Talbot: Our track record with you is that you've ducked every request we've made for an interview. We've called your office, we've gone through your friends, old Nader Raiders, people you trust and like. We've tried a number of ways to speak with you. And you've repeatedly avoided us. So what we decided when we contacted you again recently -- and again tried unsuccessfully to get you on the phone -- was that we were getting the same old runaround. You obviously weren't going to talk with us.
------------------------------------------------------------------



Here's the link. I'm not sure if it's available to nonsubscribers or not.. You should subscribe anyway if you don't already--Salon is the BEST online news source.

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/07/14/naderphonecall/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. You're not following the rules for LBN
I don't think this is LBN, but at any rate, the subject line MUST read exactly as the headline of the article does, and you need to include an excerpt from the article itself. Posting it this way is sure to get it either moved or locked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruffhowse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. God, Nader is such a PRICK!!!
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 12:44 AM by Ruffhowse
Any chance of any respect I had for Nader has been erased by reading that interview. Nader keeps talking about his candidacy representing some kind of "party". I've got news for you Ralphie, you're a party of ONE, and people are tired of your compulsive need to stay relevant and in the public eye. I will NEVER support another Ralph Nader sponsored initiative ever ever ever again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WindRavenX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. wow
Just wow.
This guy is right up there on my asshole list...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dobak Donating Member (808 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nader is old news....
Edited on Wed Jul-14-04 01:18 AM by dobak
I live in a district that was one of Nader's biggest supporters in 2000.

I work at a bookstore in the same neighborhood and can say with confidence that Nader's new book is a bomb at my store (look for it in 6 months on the bargain racks).

He was such an important and powerful person from the sidelines and then he got an ego. Instead of going down in history as an important voice for the voiceless he will be remembered for his egotism and possibly tipping 2 elections to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dolstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-04 01:29 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wow, Nader is such an ASS
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC