Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bail denied for explosives-theft suspect

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 01:34 AM
Original message
Bail denied for explosives-theft suspect
A federal judge refused Wednesday to grant bail to the man charged in connection with the theft of about 200 pounds of police explosives from a San Mateo County storage bunker, saying the suspect's drug addiction and "affection for weapons" are a dangerous combination.

Michael Alexander Allan's attorney asked U.S. Magistrate Wayne Brazil to order her client into a residential drug treatment program.

Assistant federal Public Defender Joyce Leavitt said that the Hayward cabinet maker's nine-year year criminal history stems from his addiction to methamphetamines since 1995.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2004/07/14/explosives14.TMP

One obvious factual point abou this case:
1. The first days of the case broke it was published TV/internet that the explosives were SF Police and San Mateo County Sheriff's. (ATF spokesperson said.)
2. The third day I personally saw the same ATF spokesperson say the explosives were SF Police and San Mateo County Sheriff's and the FBI's. (You can see that there were 3 containers broken in to..)
3. Today, July 14, the NBC local news has dropped the FBI in it's report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Turley Donating Member (585 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. A drug addict
Who uses an acetylene torch to cut his way into an explosives bunker.

I can live with him being off the streets for a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-04 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. They were not 'bunkers'. If you saw them on TV you can see that they
looked like sea shpping containers. Sitting out in the middle of nowhere. No guards, no video serveillence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC