Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PINOCHET CHARGED WITH CORRUPTION

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:23 AM
Original message
PINOCHET CHARGED WITH CORRUPTION


Former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet is facing charges over secret multi-million-dollar US bank accounts

While Pinochet has allegedly breached human rights, this is the first time charges of corruption have been levelled against him.

The charges were laid by Chilean lawyers Carmen Hertz and Alfonso Insunza after a US congressional investigation found that Washington, DC's Riggs Bank had ignored banking regulations to launder money between 1994 and 2002.
The accounts held between four million and eight million US dollars.

"Chilean justice must investigate however many crimes Pinochet has committed," Mrs Hertz said, after entering the charges at Santiago's Court of Appeals.

"I have no prior indications to establish the origin of these accounts, nor of the funds that were deposited in those accounts," lawyer Pablo Rodriguez admitted, after meeting other members of Pinochet's defence team.
more
http://www9.sbs.com.au/theworldnews/region.php?id=89823®ion=4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. facing charges
or charged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pinochet faces fraud charges
Santiago - Augusto Pinochet faced charges on Tuesday over secret multi-million-dollar US bank accounts, possibly tainting with fraud the Chilean ex-dictator known for human rights abuses but thought to be uncorrupt.

Chilean lawyers Carmen Hertz and Alfonso Insunza laid their charges after a US congressional investigation found that Riggs Bank, in Washington, DC, had ignored banking regulations to launder money between 1994 and 2002. The accounts held between four million and eight million dollars.

"Chilean justice must investigate however many crimes Pinochet has committed," Hertz said after entering the charges at Santiago's Court of Appeals.

"I have no prior indications to establish the origin of these accounts nor of the funds that were deposited in those accounts," lawyer Pablo Rodriguez admitted, after meeting other members of Pinochet's defence team.
more
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1560759,00.html


"entering the charges at Santiago's Court of Appeals"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Why is it always "Follow the money"?
FOLLOW-THE-MONEY METHODS

IN CRIME CONTROL POLICY

BY

R.T. Naylor

Professor of Economics

McGill University

Introduction

Over the last 15 years there has been a quiet revolution in the theory and practice of law enforcement. Instead of simply closing rackets that generate illegal income, the central objective has become to attack the flow of criminal profits after they have been earned. Prodded on first by the U.S., then by the Financial Action Task Force of the G-7 countries, then, in more recent years, by the United Nations, a new crime – money-laundering – has been put on the books of many countries. Furthermore many law enforcement agencies now host special units responsible for pursuing not malefactors, but bank accounts, investment portfolios, houses and cars; while officials of the justice system are made responsible for managing such sequestrated assets until they can be forfeited and sold. The law enforcement apparatus therefore has ventured onto territory and begun using methodologies formerly the preserve of revenue authorities. Given the current zeal, it sometimes seems as if what criminals do has ceased to be as important as how much they earn by doing it.
(snip)
In the early 20th Century a wave of Puritanism swept North America. One consequence was a concerted effort to criminalize personal vice. Gambling, buying the services of prostitutes, using recreational drugs and even the consumption of alcohol were criminalized or, were they already criminal offenses, the laws were more rigorously and systematically enforced. No longer would cities be permitted to host "red light districts" in which otherwise legitimate citizens could temporarily sate their appetites before returning to a world of respectability.9 In response there was a dramatic change in the direction of law enforcement, the nature of which still does not seem fully understood. For the first time the main thrust of police action shifted from combating predatory offenses (robbery, extortion, embezzlement and the like practiced at the expense of an unwilling public) to attacking enterprise crimes (in which underground entrepreneurs attempted to service the forbidden consumption needs of a complicit public). Though today both are simply lumped together in the criminal code, there was and still remains a profound difference between the two in terms of their economic nature and social impact.

Crimes of a predatory nature have historically defined the evolution, objectives and modus operandi of the criminal justice system. They have also stamped their character heavily into the mindset of the law enforcement apparatus which still tends to think in terms of good guys and bad guys, cops and robbers, crooks and victims. At their core, predatory offenses are quite simple. They involve the redistribution of existing wealth from one party to another. Such transfers are bilateral, involving victim and perpetrator. Though others may be involved in subsequent handling of the misappropriated property, the fundamental act remains a bilateral transfer. These transfers are also involuntary, generally using force or the threat of force, though deceit may sometimes suffice. The victims (individuals, institutions or corporations) are readily identifiable, and usually quite willing to idenfity themselves to the police. The losses by the victims are also simple to determine – a robbed (or defrauded) person, institution or corporation can point to specific money and property. The sums involved, however large in relation to the participants, are small in relation to the economy as a whole, not only for each incident but summed over the total of all such incidents. (An economy in which theft and fraud were the operational norm would, by definition, have an existence that was nasty, brutish and, above all, short.) Since the transfers are involuntary, the morality is unambiguous – someone has been wronged by someone else. Therefore, over and above direct punishment of the guilty party, the policy response is simple - restitution to the victim of his/her property.

Enterprise crimes are quite different.10 While predatory offenses have a long historical pedigree, enterprise crimes, properly defined, became important as a result of the criminalization of personal vice in the early part of the 20th Century. These crimes involve the production and/or distribution of new goods and services that happen to be illegal by their very nature – recreational drugs or illicit gambling, for example. Here the exchanges are multilateral, much like legitimate market transactions, involving (among others) producers, distributors, retailers and money-managers on the supply side and final consumers on the demand side. Since the transfers are voluntary, it is often difficult to define a "victim", unless it is some abstract (and largely meaningless) construct like "society." Nor is either side to the bargain likely to step forward willingly to assis the police. Although the total sums involved are often claimed to be considerable, in themselves and in relation to the economy as a whole, provided the transaction remains voluntary, there are no definable losses to any individual from the act itself (though there may be from indirect consequences of the act). The morality is accordingly debatable.

To be sure the contrast between predatory and enterprise offenses is not always so clear. In practice some predatory crimes require enterprise ones to fence stolen merchandise or to launder illicitly obtained cash. However the underlying act generating the money is unambiguously predatory since it involves an involuntary transfer of existing wealth of legitimate citizens by illegitimate ones. On the other hand, some enterprise offenses are committed in an environment punctuated by force or fraud. But the basic act is still a consensual contract between supplier and customer of new goods and services. They involved an symbiosis between the legitimate and the illegitimate, the first providing the demand and the second the supply in a voluntary market relationship.
(snip)
http://www.yorku.ca/nathanson/Publications/washout.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Corruption?
That's the least of his crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Al Capone was caught for tax evasion.
I'm just sayin'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Yes, but . . .
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 02:12 PM by Jack Rabbit
. . . that was sufficient for Capone. He was about forty when convicted and it was enough to send him to Alcatraz for a long time. Since he had syphillis, it turned out to be a life sentence.

Although it is true that any sentence Pinochet gets would also be, ofr all intnents and purposes, a life sentence, charging him with this kind of thing reduces him to the level of Boss Tweed or Spiro Agnew rather than his peers, people like Josef Stalin and Saddam Hussein. He is one of the major criminals of his time and should be treated with the respect due him.

Pinochet is a criminal of a higher order than Al Capone. How's that for saying a mouthful?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. BBC News snip:
Judge to probe Pinochet finances


A court in Chile has started an investigation into allegations of corruption against the former leader Augusto Pinochet. Two human rights lawyers earlier said they had lodged accusations of fraud, embezzlement and bribery.

The claims were prompted by a US Senate report last week alleging that a US-based bank helped Gen Pinochet hide up to $8m and evade seizure of his assets. A spokesman for Gen Pinochet has denied the allegations.

Gen Pinochet's son, Marco Antonio Pinochet, said the money in the accounts had come from decades of hard work and donations from supporters, and not from state funds. The case is the first legal action in Chile resulting from the Senate report.

Judge Sergio Munoz was appointed to investigate after the lawyers lodged accusations of financial crimes with the Court of Appeals. "Pinochet's actions have to be investigated in Chile because he transferred money up until at least the year 2003 in a lucid manner and in contradiction with all the latest verdicts by Chilean courts that say he is crazy or demented," lawyer Carmen Hertz said.

The Court of Appeals recently stripped Gen Pinochet of immunity from prosecution, a move that paved the way for a trial on charges of human rights abuses during his 1973-1990 rule.

Previous attempts to prosecute him for human rights abuses were dismissed on medical grounds.

Last week it was announced that the bank mentioned in the Senate report, Riggs Bank, would be sold.

The report alleges it set up several accounts for Gen Pinochet while he was under house arrest in the UK on charges of crimes against humanity. He was held in Britain in 1998 after Spain requested his extradition on torture charges, but was allowed home in 2000 after he was adjudged too ill to stand trial.

From:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3912293.stm


P2 Lodge eat your heart out.....Santiago corrpution rap AND Rome Calvi murder trial.

Just one question.....what was UK Chancellor Gordon Brown doing in the Vatican last week having a chat with JP2???Converting to Catholicism or dampening down more bank account exhumations like the Riggs/Pinochet biz?.....


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Catholic organisation, Opus Dei
Pope orders Austria abuse inquiry



The state prosecutor said the police investigation had focused only on the child pornography aspect of the case, as "homosexual relations between consenting adults not involving the abuse of an authority relationship" was not a crime in Austria.

A member of the conservative Catholic organisation, Opus Dei, will report his findings directly to the Pope.

His appointment signals the end of an inquiry headed by the bishop in charge of the seminary, Kurt Krenn, according to the Archdiocese of Vienna.

Bishop Krenn has rejected calls for his resignation, having earlier said the images at the centre of scandal depicted a "schoolboy prank".
more
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/3910293.stm

more
Sex scandal draws intense interest in Austria
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=694019



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Would it be just bad to be true if Opus Dei either thru individual
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 01:11 PM by emad aisat sana
members or as an organisation held any shares in PNC or its subsidiaries/affiliates/associates?

They have just moved to a new $49 million HQ at 243 Lexington Avenue at East 34th Street, NYC:

http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=100380

Edit:
Remember busted FBI traitor Bob Hanssen had extensive Opus Dei links:

"If there were one place that Hanssen did belong, it was Opus Dei. The group, founded in 1928, had just 84,000 members worldwide--3,000 in the U.S.--but its new $55 million, 17-story building in midtown Manhattan reflected a power far beyond its numbers. At least one member of the U.S. Supreme Court was said to be a member and the head of the FBI, Louis Freeh, was also rumored to belong. Still, even Catholics conceded that the group was controversial. Many members practiced self-flagellation, beating themselves while praying. Others wore the cilice, a spiked bracelet worn two hours a day around the thighs. Though the pain was supposed to replicate the agony of Christ at his crucifixion, most had difficulty understanding why such practices were necessary in a modern world. And since the group was private if not secret, rumors abounded. What was its goal? One of them, critics said, was to elect Opus Dei members as heads of countries and establish new governments where church and state are one.

Bonnie Hanssen’s brother is an Opus Dei priest in Rome whose office is mere steps away from the pope. One of Bob and Bonnie’s daughters is an Opus Dei numerary, a woman who has taken a vow of celibacy while remaining a layperson.

Bob Hanssen befriended best-selling espionage author James Bamford, and after pumping him for information about interviews he had had with Soviet leaders, would invite him to join him at Opus Dei meetings. “He was a little obsessed about it. Bob would rant about the evil in organizations like Planned Parenthood and how abortion was immoral,” Bamford recalled. Bamford, himself a Catholic, wrote this about his preoccupation with Opus Dei in the New York Times:

“Hanssen squeezed religion into most conversations and hung a silver crucifix above his desk. Occasionally he would leave work to take part in antiabortion rallies. He was forever trying to get me to go with him to meetings of Opus Dei.

After weeks of urging, I finally agreed. At the meeting, Hanssen was in his element. He reveled in that closed society of true believers like a fraternity brother exchanging a secret handshake. His faith seemed too sincere to be a ruse.”

From:
http://www.crimelibrary.com/terrorists_spies/spies/hanssen/5.html?sect=23

And

Regarding: Hanssen's Conservative Catholic Connection

"Suspected spy Robert Hanssen was many things, including a devout Catholic. He was a member of an organization, Opus Dei, a religious group of lay men (some of whom take a vow of chastity) and priests that has a strong following in Washington.

"Fifteen years ago, at the height of the Reagan administration, dozens of Opus Dei members held prominent jobs in the White House, on Capitol Hill, and throughout the government. Now that group, which meets regularly in a large house in Washington, is coming under scrutiny by the FBI.

"If Hanssen was active in this group, who's to say what he heard, what he saw, or whether there might be others who inadvertently and unknowingly aided him over the years," says an FBI source. "It's troubling because this is such a high-profile group. The names of its members and friends reached into the cabinet of the Reagan and Bush administrations.

"We don't believe anyone knowingly aided Hanssen, but he was very good at manipulating people, and we have to check it out."Opus Dei is a beloved organization of Pope John Paul II. It is known for its good works, particularly in the areas of education. While it is often referred to as "secretive", there has never been a whiff of scandal about the group."

Editor: I know for a fact that Opus Dei members swear absolute obedience to the Pope personally. They have NO authority between the members and the Pope who can pull rank on them. They are about 98% laymen, and priests are not invited to join. They vow to do anything the Pope tells them to do.

I believe that Robert Hanssen was doing exactly what the Pope told him to do-- destroy the United States. The Vatican has had a policy of destruction for the USA since long before the days of Abraham Lincoln, whom they assassinated. So, let's not go all soft headed-- The Vatican is in absolute control of ALL Opus Dei members. They take an oath inviting death on themselves if they betray the Pope. I fully expect George Bush and the FBI to wimp out on this one just like the Feds wimped out on Abraham Lincoln.

From:
http://www.blessedquietness.com/journal/housechu/rc-2.htm











Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. Just proves the more important crime is stealing RICH peoples money
Edited on Wed Jul-21-04 11:02 AM by nolabels
Torture, murder, Alcohol and Tobacco Smuggling, Arms Trafficking, Corruption, Counterfeiting, Drug Trafficking, Extortion, Fraud, Gambling, Labour Racketeering, Loan Sharking, Money Laundering, Robbery, Theft, Hijacking and Home Invasion, Smuggling of Humans, Trafficking in Women and Children for Sexual Purposes, Violence are just ancillary crimes. The real reasons for Laws is to help RICH people keep
hold of money (however they got it) and stay RICH

All for a LIE - Demand Justice - Bush/Cheney Prison


http://la.indymedia.org/news/2004/04/107605.php



Organized Crime in North America and the World:
A Bibliography
http://www.yorku.ca/nathanson/bibliography/contents.htm

Is Henry Kissinger a war criminal, fascist or just misunderstood
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=345935
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RFKHumphreyObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. Let me guess...Pinochet's going to become gravely ill again
Until he's determined to be "too sick for prosecution". I presume he's using the same doctors as all the other "sick until charges dropped" dictators and failed businessmen are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Oh he is already
dementia dochano!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Wonder where all that freshly laundered cash will end up n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-21-04 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 03:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. A kick for Henry also
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
16. At this point, ANYTHING which brings him censure is better than nothing
From the article:
"Pinochet has committed crimes against the general interests of at least three countries: Chile, Spain and the United States and the crime of fraud against the families of the victims of his crimes that we take before Spanish courts," Mrs Hertz said.

Her husband was killed soon after the military took power in 1973, the so-called *"Caravan of Death" for which Pinochet had been charged but never faced trial, claiming dementia.
(snip)




*For a few days in October 1973, a self-styled military "delegation" toured provincial cities in northern and southern Chile, killing dozens of political opponents of General Augusto Pinochet's September coup.
Many of the victims of what became known as the "Caravan of Death" had voluntarily turned themselves into the military authorities.

Prisoners were taken from their cells and summarily executed, often without the knowledge or consent of the local military authorities

At least 72 people were killed and memories of the "caravan" endure as one of the most notorious episodes of human rights abuse during Chile's military rule.

Analysts say the events set the seal on Chile's long military dictatorship.

The army unit travelled from town to town in a Puma helicopter, armed with grenades, machine guns and knives.
(snip/...)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/850932.stm

So Augusto Pinochet, the old caudillo who bragged that not a blade of grass could grow without his permission and trained dogs to violate women for his amusement, went home to Chile after all. Fortuitous signs of senility, following a remarkably clear-headed and pugnacious defense, have dashed all hopes that he will stand trial in Spain on charges of kidnapping, torture, disappearances and the murder of over 3,000 people.
(snip/...)
http://www.marrder.com/htw/mar2000/editorial.htm

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


What a terrible shame he was ever born, and that our own government under the Republicans helped him kill so many "leftists, union workers, students, clergy, human rights workers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC