Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Says It Got Afghan From Vigilantes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 04:24 AM
Original message
U.S. Says It Got Afghan From Vigilantes
U.S. Says It Got Afghan From Vigilantes
By STEPHEN GRAHAM
Associated Press Writer


KABUL, Afghanistan (AP)--The U.S. military acknowledged Thursday it held an Afghan man for a month after taking custody of him from a trio of American counterterror vigilantes who have since been arrested on charges of torturing prisoners at a private jail they ran in the Afghan capital.

The American military has tried to distance itself from the group, led by a former American soldier named Jonathan Idema, insisting they were freelancers working outside the law. But spokesman Maj. Jon Siepmann acknowledged that the military had received a detainee from Idema's group at Bagram Air Base, north of Kabul, on May 3.
(snip)

``That doesn't mean at the time that we knew Mr. Idema's full track record or other things he was doing out there,'' Siepmann said. ``This was a person who turned in a person who we believed was on our list of terrorists and we accepted him.''

Siepmann declined to identify the detainee or the fugitive he was mistaken for.
(snip/...)

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/ap/ap_story.html/Intl/AP.V5667.AP-Afghan-US-Vigil.html
(Free registration required)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. nothing suspect about that. nope. move along, nothing to see here.
since when do "freelancers working outside the law" work for free in the most dangerous part of the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. Here's the same article from an non-registration source:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like we have the 'week-end' gun nuts out of this country.
I guess they got sick of putting on make believe uniforms and running up and down our Mts. so they are going world wide. Is this another thing we have shipped over seas? People who play army?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 06:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Just more mercenaries not vigilantes.
I find it very hard to believe these guys weren't working for Rummy. In fact I'd say it's ridiculous to even consider they were on their own in Afghanistan. Who would have the money to pay for them to travel there? How would they fund their operation? How would they travel there with their weapons and how would they get ammo and supplies? It's pretty obvious they couldn't do what they were doing without the knowledge, consent and assistance of the American government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 07:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Gosh, yeah, Sentinel Chicken. Thanks for the slap to wake us up!
I just glumly "bought" the "vigilante" label, ("Vigilante? Yes, master....") and didn't even have the incentive to think it over! Quite a difference between the two words.

They're little wizards of sneaky, subliminal word trickery, aren't they? They don't respect us when they are trying to avoid telling us the truth, and spin their words directly to our unconscious.


Republican high priests of propaganda!


I'd like to see this all backfire in their faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Think about though ..
We're being asked to believe these guys just decided to WHAT? Quit their jobs and spend every dime they ever made to go to Afghanistan for some payback!???
Is there no lie the Bush's consider to unbelievable to ram down the throats the American public?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. related article from VOA
http://www.voanews.com/article.cfm?objectID=D56D0A2C-3FD5-4685-BDAB149718377E2C

U.S. military officials in Afghanistan have acknowledged the military took custody of a detainee from three Americans now on trial in Kabul for allegedly running a private jail. But the officials deny the Americans were working for the military.

Coalition spokesman Major Jon Siepmann said Thursday the detainee was accepted and held for questioning because he had been identified as a potential terrorist.

Washington has denied any connection to the three Americans who held the suspect.

One of the three (Jonathan Idema) said Wednesday in a Kabul courtroom that he and his two colleagues are prepared to show evidence they were in frequent contact with the Pentagon.

...more...

It doesn't sound like there was a credible distance between the US military and Idema's group. The trail should lead back up the food chain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. What a weird story! "... and we accepted him.'' WTF! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. They claim they had nothing to do with the military or CIA
Except NATO troops treated them as if they were connected to the U.S. military, because they just assumed they were.
Karzai's cops treated them as if they were connected to the U.S. military, because they just assumed they were.
The U.S. military "accepted" captured Afghans from them.
Nobody bothers to ask these guys who they are? As if.

Now Idema claims he was plugged into the top, all the way to Rummy. Spooks or mercenaries, or some weird hybrid of the two. They will be let go, one way or another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidDithers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Related article in Toronto Star this morning...
link:
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&call_pageid=971358637177&c=Article&cid=1090447813122

Their own personal war on terror
U.S. civilians on trial for jailing, abusing Afghans

`We were in contact with Rumsfeld'


KABUL—An American charged with running a private "war on terror" in Afghanistan claims he and two other Americans were working with the full of knowledge of U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Jonathan "Jack" Idema, who denies charges he detained and tortured Afghan citizens without U.S. government consent, told reporters yesterday the trio hunted terrorists under the auspices of the Pentagon but have now been abandoned by U.S. authorities.

"We were working for the U.S. counter-terrorist group and working with the Pentagon and some other federal agencies," Idema said before the opening of his trial on charges of illegally taking people hostage, detaining and torturing them.

"We were in contact directly by fax and e-mail and phone with Donald Rumsfeld's office."

<snip>

Started an LBN thread on this earlier this morning, but it quickly faded.

Sid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Shouldn't be too hard to prove then
if they were in contact with the Pentagon via phones, faxes, and email.

<tapping foot waiting for Republican outrage>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. 'We didn't know his record or what he was doing'
Isn't that EXACTLY why the whole idea of using mercenaries is BAD in the first place?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. US admits that it accepted Afghan from `vigilantes'
AP AND NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE , KABUL
Friday, Jul 23, 2004,Page 5

The US military yesterday acknowledged it had held an Afghan man for a month after receiving him from three US counterterror vigilantes who have since been arrested on charges of torture at a private jail they ran in the Afghan capital.

The US military has tried to distance itself from the group, led by a former US soldier named Jonathan Idema, insisting they were freelancers working outside the law.

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/world/archives/2004/07/23/2003180062
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algomas Donating Member (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
15. Is it possible they are bounty hunters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC