Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Reports 94 Cases of Prisoner Abuse

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:22 AM
Original message
U.S. Reports 94 Cases of Prisoner Abuse
WASHINGTON July 22, 2004 — The U.S. military has found 94 cases of confirmed or alleged abuse of prisoners by U.S. soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan since the fall of 2001, the Army's inspector general said Thursday in a long-awaited report made public at a hastily called Senate hearing.

The number is significantly higher than all other previous estimates given by the Pentagon, which had refused until now to give a total number of abuse allegations.

The inspector general investigation, ordered Feb. 10 after the allegations of abuse at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq came to the attention of top Army officials in Washington, concluded that there were no systemic problems that contributed to the abuse. In some cases, the report found, the abuse was abetted or facilitated by officers not following proper procedures.

. . .

In contrast to its own findings that there were no systemic problems, however, the Army report also cites a February report from the International Committee for the Red Cross that alleged that "methods of ill treatment" were "used in a systematic way" by the U.S. military in Iraq.

http://abcnews.go.com/wire/Politics/ap20040722_980.html

and they made to hastily call a Senate hearing in order to dump this news at the same time of the 911 commission report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Boy, those "6 or 7 guys"
were really busy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. and lets not forget the contractors' complicity in this
that i'm sure were not in the scope of the IG's investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah...
They must've had a huge tankful of steam to let off...:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
4. media sticking with the script
Make sure to call it abuse or ill treatment. It would be unpatriotic to call it gang-raping kids, tying electrodes to genitals, attacking naked prisoners with dogs. For God's sake do not call it TORTURE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigone382 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:48 AM
Original message
How ridiculous.
Nevermind that procedures put in place by high-ranking administration officials, such as Donald Rumsfeld, created an atmosphere extremely conducive to abuse and torture; that military interrogators encouraged brutality and gross public humiliation to coerce prisoner testimony; that we used private contractors, who have immunity from prosecution in Iraq and don't have to worry about being court martialed or facing consequences for their actions; that the administration approved of keeping certain prisoners in secret, without the knowledge of the Red Cross; there weren't any systemic problems.

It all must have been because of Clinton's penis.


Oh, and one more thing. Personally, 94 incidents of abuse in itself constitutes a "systemic problem" IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigone382 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
5. How ridiculous.
Nevermind that procedures put in place by high-ranking administration officials, such as Donald Rumsfeld, created an atmosphere extremely conducive to abuse and torture; that military interrogators encouraged brutality and gross public humiliation to coerce prisoner testimony; that we used private contractors, who have immunity from prosecution in Iraq and don't have to worry about being court martialed or facing consequences for their actions; that the administration approved of keeping certain prisoners in secret, without the knowledge of the Red Cross; there weren't any systemic problems.

It all must have been because of Clinton's penis.


Oh, and one more thing. Personally, 94 incidents of abuse in itself constitutes a "systemic problem" IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
birdbrain Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. If they fess up to 94 cases,
the real number must be at least 20 times that figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That is only from Iraq and Afghanistan
Edited on Thu Jul-22-04 12:05 PM by Robbien
They are not reporting the Cuba base or any of the dozen or so "secret" prisons.

No wonder DynCorp Etal make so much money from the US Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-22-04 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Duplicate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC