Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Boston, the word is ‘mum’, dissent gets no invitation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
BaysideLiberal Donating Member (45 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 07:38 AM
Original message
In Boston, the word is ‘mum’, dissent gets no invitation
With Kerry’s chances so fragile, dissent gets no invitation

BOSTON - The Democratic Party, for decades burdened by deep divisions and misgivings about how and how much America should engage the world, is preparing for the first time since 1972 to make American foreign policy and national security a centerpiece of their national campaign.

This is not to suggest that the divisions that have haunted the party since Vietnam are gone; they are not. Many of the rank-and-file Democratic delegates gathered here to hand the party’s standard to Sen. John Kerry remain deeply suspicious of the size of America’s defense budget and the deployment of American troops in places like Iraq.

The vast majority of these Democrats also put domestic economic and social concerns ahead of foreign policy issues, and many of them object privately to Kerry’s stated intention, if elected, to keep American troops in Iraq and even to expanding the size of the U.S. Army by 40,000 troops.

Yet there appears to be a consensus, at least among the party regulars, that Kerry’s chances of unseating George W. Bush are too fragile to survive any kind of internal debate on issues of national security.

“Inside the Fleet Center, you’re not going to see a whole lot of dissent on any aspect of foreign policy,” says a Howard Dean supporter from Wisconsin who asked not to be named. “I think people understand that even if national security isn’t a Democratic advantage, the Iraq war has made it one of Bush’s vulnerabilities. So, basically, we’ll hold our noses and applaud.”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5520038/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Justice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Being United Implies Fragile? Don't You Love The Words These Folks Use
This is too rich.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Literally written by a MORAN
That is too funny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. "Fragile"? Kerry is trouncing AWOL in the polls..
heh.. sounds like wishful thinking from the repuke media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. Note that bushsucks*'s chance are not fragile
They're not that good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. A second look this isn't too bad of an analysis-but I LOVED this
As the prospect of a Kerry presidency has gone from unlikely to conceivable in recent months,

Uh-huh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
displacedtexan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. What a crock!
Cheney it, MSNBC! I just want the news!

No facts to support the use of "fragile," "divisions," or "many... deeply suspicious."

This MSRNCBC fish-wrap excuse for reporting is why Journalism classes have been reduced to multiple-choice spelling and grammar exercises: rightwing fascist fundies can't pass real Journalism tests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
russian33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. I love it when they quote sources who 'ask not to be named'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lottie244 Donating Member (903 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-04 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
8. Evidently Jimmy Carter didn't get the word!
The most honest President, the most decent President of all time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC