Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hope no dupe, CNN reporting "CIA thinks NK has 2 "small" nukes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 04:23 PM
Original message
Hope no dupe, CNN reporting "CIA thinks NK has 2 "small" nukes
Well, THAT is a relief. Imagine if they had some BIG ones!
:eyes: :crazy: :grr: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xray s Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe they mean cuke's?
Here's a big one.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. What I don't understand
is that North Korea announced to the world that they had nukes at least a year ago.

But every couple of months or so the CIA says they've 'discovered' this and it makes headlines.

Not only is this not news to everyone else...it shouldn't be news to the CIA!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. cuz the admin isn't ready for a NK nuke threat, yet
they have a few more phony McThreats to scare us with first, out in the Money East
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Wonder if these are the same 2 nukes that the US said they had in 1989?
Sounds like Junior needs to get peoples mind off of Iraq because its getting too hot for him? Don

http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/0827/p07s01-woap.html

How serious is North Korea's nuclear threat?

<snip>Does North Korea have the bomb now?

Perhaps. The mystery dates back to 1989, when North Korea shut down its nuclear reactor in Yongbyon for 70 days. During this time, the regime removed some of the plant's fuel rods and extracted plutonium through what's called reprocessing. Plutonium is the key element needed to make the type of bomb dropped on Nagasaki, Japan, in 1945.

The regime claimed it reprocessed rods only once for a tiny amount of plutonium. But tests by outside inspectors showed several rounds of reprocessing.

"That immediately raised suspicions," says Charles Ferguson, scientist-in-residence at the Washington office of the Monterey Institute's Center for Nonproliferation Studies. "Did they separate more than what they were saying?"

Experts can only estimate how much plutonium might have been processed in that month. The consensus among US experts and CIA officials is that it got enough plutonium for one or two bombs.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is that kind of like being partially pregnant?
Girlfriend to Boyfriend, "The bad news is that I am pregnant. The good news is that it is only a small baby."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-03 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah...like the folks in Chicago were only shot by a SMALL CALIBER gun
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC