Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US bases in Iraq: sticky politics, hard math

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 07:55 AM
Original message
US bases in Iraq: sticky politics, hard math
http://www.csmonitor.com/2004/0930/p17s02-cogn.html

If a new Iraq government should agree to let American forces stay on, how many bases will the US request?


One, as the United States Army currently maintains in Honduras? Six, the number of installations it lists in the Netherlands. Or maybe 12?

The Pentagon isn't saying.

But a dozen is the number of so-called "enduring bases" located by John Pike, director of GlobalSecurities.org. His military affairs website gives their names. They include, for example, Camp Victory at the Baghdad airfield and Camp Renegade in Kirkuk. The Chicago Tribune last March said US engineers are constructing 14 "enduring bases," but Mr. Pike hasn't located two of them.

Note the terminology "enduring" bases. That's Pentagon-speak for long-term encampments - not necessarily permanent, but not just a tent on a wood platform either. It all suggests a planned indefinite stay on Iraqi soil that will cost US taxpayers for years to come.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. and if this
Gawd-fearing *co says prayers, at the end he concludes:

"And war forever, amen"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MGKrebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. correction...
Edited on Sat Oct-02-04 08:56 AM by MGKrebs
that website is actually www.globalsecurity.org

2 demerits for the CSM.

edit: and read Pike's stuff here. Rummy's comments are interesting. (this is not new.)

http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/iraq-intro.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Very informative link
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt_Nemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. John Pike's site is one of the most informative web resources
about military affairs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks, I'll add it to favorites n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. interesting comment indeed....
and worth reading again....:grr:

<snip>
American officials have tried to make the point that the US presence in Iraq will not be a permanent or long-term one. US Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in a 21 April 2003 press conference said that any suggestion that the United States is planning a permanent military presence in Iraq is "inaccurate and unfortunate." Rumsfeld said "I have never, that I can recall, heard the subject of a permanent base in Iraq discussed in any meeting. ... The likelihood of it seems to me to be so low that it does not surprise me that it's never been discussed in my presence, to my knowledge. Why do I say it's low? Well, we've got all kinds of options and opportunities in that part of the world to locate forces, it's not like we need a new place. We have plenty of friends and plenty of ability to work with them and have locations for things that help to contribute to stability in the region. ... Rumsfeld: I think there is a down side. I think any impression that is left, which that article left, that the United States plans some sort of a permanent presence in that country, I think is a signal to the people of that country that's inaccurate and unfortunate, because we don't plan to function as an occupier, we don't plan to prescribe to any new government how we ought to be arranged in their country."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Great site
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Providing protection for Israel !!!
Joe repuke needs to get a clue what his tax dollars in Iraq are paying for...

<The actual amount depends on how many troops are stationed there for the long term. If the US decides to reduce its forces there from the 138,000 now to, say, 50,000, and station them in bases, the costs would run between $5 billion to $7 billion a year, estimates Gordon Adams, director of Security Policy Studies at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. That's two to three times as much as the annual American subsidy to Israel. is one of several reasons some analysts cite for the US invasion of Iraq.>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Chicago Tribune has a lengthy article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. crap... you have to register....
could you give me some highlights? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio rules Donating Member (283 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-02-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
8. Are we ever getting out of Germany?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick for "Operation Enduring Bases"
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illuminaughty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
11. Anyone remember the SNL skit
many, many years ago with Belushi playing "The Thing That Wouldn't Leave"? Where the guy shows up at your house and doesn't know when to go home. Well that's us. The Thing That Wouldn't Leave.

We're not leaving Germany, hey, it's only been 60 years. And we aren't leaving Iraq. 14 permanent bases and the largest American embassy in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-03-04 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. We left Iran. We left Vietnam. We will leave Iraq before too long n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC