Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. considers ways to increase troops in Iraq for vote (+20,000 needed)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:51 AM
Original message
U.S. considers ways to increase troops in Iraq for vote (+20,000 needed)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-10-25-troops-increase_x.htm

Concerned that they won't get enough new troops from allies to help provide security for Iraqi elections in January, Pentagon officials are considering increasing the current U.S. force by delaying the departures of some U.S. troops now in Iraq and accelerating the deployment of others scheduled to go there next year.

The goal is to temporarily raise the number of U.S. troops in Iraq from the current 138,000 to almost 160,000 to help protect international and Iraqi election workers and secure polling locations.

That addition would bring the sustained U.S. troop presence in Iraq to its highest level since President Bush declared an end to major combat operations on May 1, 2003.

Defense officials were reluctant to discuss the options on the record. But Capt. Harold Pittman, a spokesman for Gen. John Abizaid, the commander of Central Command, said, "Obviously, we are looking at all of those options and taking everything into account. ... There are a lot of options, possibilities and venues on the table to provide additional security during the election time frame."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sonicx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. that's right, we don't need a draft...
rinse and repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. If we hadn't treated the Iraqis so contemptuously
There would have been sufficient number of Iraqi police and army to secure their own elections.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush has promised there will be no draft
That means additional tours for those already serving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Christmas closer to the "Holy Land"
So much for "bring them home for the holidays" - which was Nixon's program in 1969-70. This criminal cabal belongs in jail. It's not enough by a mile to just vote them out. Not by a mile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zorra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. We can send our domestic troops and leaved our borders undefended.
That would be logical for Bu$h, since he has been working so assiduously at destroying America anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Buy yourself a clue fellas. You need at least double what you have. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-27-04 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
7. They need a million men to control Iraq.
They are simply trying to shit the public. They will eventually get a million if chimp gets in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC