Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CSMonitor: Bush administration blurs media boundary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:47 PM
Original message
CSMonitor: Bush administration blurs media boundary
<<SNIP>>
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0217/p01s01-uspo.html

Bush administration blurs media boundary

Controversy over a 'journalist' adds to the buzz about message control in capital.

By Gail Russell Chaddock | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

WASHINGTON – First came video "news releases" produced by the Bush administration using a TV news format. Then came three conservative columnists who got big paychecks from federal agencies. Now, there's Jeff Gannon (not his real name), a journalist (maybe) who gained surprisingly easy access to the president, only to lob a sympathetically slanted question.

No evidence has surfaced that Mr. Gannon was directed by the White House, but the circumstances ignited a debate over the inner workings of the White House press room.

....

The classic presidential tack for managing the news is to shut off access to journalists. Deeply frustrated by the coverage of the Watergate scandal, President Nixon directed his staff to ban any representative from the New York Times, the Washington Post, Time Magazine, Newsweek, CBS, and a UPI reporter from the press pool - an order his staff largely ignored. But during the 2004 campaign, a New York Times reporter assigned to cover Vice President Cheney was routinely excluded from the press plane.

....

"There is a pattern of propaganda by the Bush administration that must be stopped," said House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi.

<</SNIP>>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Knight-Ridder was also not allowed near Cheney because they reported
the CIA agents' charge that the WH was cooking the intel books on Iraq.

This is a great article. Please send it to your local papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agree, not a bad job at all by CSM....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. OMG....bush* PR Budget went from $39 million to $88.2 million last year


That's OUR tax money, used for bush* propaganda.....what is this, the Soviet Union?, Cuba?....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demgrrrll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I am imagining Karl Rove running around trying to stamp out all of these
little brush fires before they become a roaring blaze. hmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. A few years ago, all the kids in high school
wanted to be "journalists". Now they all want to "go into PR".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diamond14 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. $ 49.2 MILLION more for bush* propaganda...what insanity ! while cutting


school budgets, and leaving children behind all over America....

$ 49.2 MILLION would pay for a LOT of TEACHERS....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. our tax money used for Bush's election propaganda. Last year was ALL about
Bush's campaign and hold on power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubleinwinter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. Good article... The Christian Science Monitor is HIGHLY respected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-05 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I recommended this so more can see it.
I hope others will do the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. Kick for real jourmalism
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Technowitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. 'Blurs'? Hardly. Erased it entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC