Judith Miller Goes With What She's Got
Perhaps nearing jail, the New York Times reporter, in public appearances, refuses to apologize for her WMD reporting. Meanwhile, she imperils her newspaper by rejecting out of hand the idea of a negotiated compromise with the prosecutor in the Plame case.
By William E. Jackson Jr.
(March 27, 2005) --
snip
She repeated several times at Berkeley (I have watched the video) her excuse that “you go with what you’ve got,” when referring both to her WMD sources and the unidentified leakers she is now protecting in the Plame case. Miller carries on with her now-tired argument that if she was duped by her unnamed sources on WMD, well, so was the Bush Administration.
Miller indicated she's not apologizing for believing there were WMDs in Iraq until the president does. “I think I was given information by people who believed the information they were giving the president,” she told Bergman. Ultimately, Miller said, she “wrote the best assessment that I could based on the information that I had.”
She attempted to tie the controversy over her WMD reporting to her current court struggles, and she partly blamed others when arguing that she had heard only after the fact that there had been people who had reservations about the WMD intelligence she was receiving. “I wish they had come forward at the time to express those reservations,” she said. ”To me, this case that I am now involved in emphasizes the importance of getting as many people as possible to come forward with a dissenting view, or allegations of wrongdoing.”
Despite her eloquent passion in defense of freedom of the press, her historical revisionism on the WMD story, when passing off such falsehoods, boggles the mind.
snip
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/shoptalk_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000856144