Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative, Liberal, Principled

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 11:11 AM
Original message
Conservative, Liberal, Principled
Conservative, Liberal, Principled

By E. J. Dionne Jr.

Tuesday, March 29, 2005; Page A15


Liberals have so little respect for conservatives these days that people on the left are genuinely astonished when people on the right have principled disagreements with each other. The left assumes the right marches in lock step under orders from the White House.

Conservatives have so little respect for liberals that they see every liberal action as inspired by hatred of President Bush, opposition to religion and contempt for people in "the heartland."

The paradoxical result of this mutual contempt is that each side is simultaneously underestimated and overestimated. As a result, current political arrangements are seen as permanent and the possibilities of political change are missed -- even when change is in the process of happening.

The right is widely assumed to have more coherence and discipline than it does. That means its dominance in our politics is exaggerated while its intellectual energy is insufficiently appreciated. Few outside its ranks acknowledge how many philosophical streams feed the conservative movement.

The left is widely assumed to be in a state of a perpetual disarray, inspired mostly by knee-jerk responses such as "political correctness" or "radical secularism." For at least a decade now, conservatives have gleefully called their political foes "reactionary liberals" whose main task, they say, is the preservation of a New Deal-Great Society status quo. Since the 2004 election gave narrow but firm control of Washington's two elected branches of government to a Republican Party committed to conservatism, the dominant political narrative has highlighted the right's effectiveness and the left's fecklessness.

Yet the liberals' opposition to many of Bush's policies -- in particular his Social Security program and his tax cuts for the wealthy -- cannot be dismissed as a blind rejection of whatever this controversial president proposes. If there is a principle that unites the left side of the political spectrum, it is a belief that an energetic government can effectively use progressive taxation to insure the poor, the unlucky and the elderly against undue hardship. Bush's embrace of the partial privatization of Social Security has thus united liberals and created a sense of momentum unusual for the left during the Bush years.<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOPFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. A good read
I think it's nice when someone like Dionne can pull back and look at the bigger picture, but as long as people like DeLay, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and Norquist make it their life's work to demonize and crush the left, I will hate the GOP.

And what the hell does he mean by "while its intellectual energy is insufficiently appreciated..."? I see lots of energy on the right, but very little intellect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The White Tree Donating Member (630 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think a lot of these conservatives are quite intelligent
Cheney, William Krystol, Wolfowitz, Rove. It's just that their intellect is directed completely and totally toward their self- interest as opposed to what is best for all Americans.

They have strong intellect but little empathy.

In essence the inteligensia of the right is like one big, old boys network where the principal that rules is - You scratch my back I'll scratch yours.

And I would disagree that there are many streams of philosophy amongst conservatives. I think there are actually very few - There is Judeo-Christian Fundamentalism, the Neo-Con world view of the US as the dominating superpower and the view that the Rights of Ownership trump the rights of everything else.

Everything else just seems to be posturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-05 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry, But the Characterizations of Democrats

are just so much bullshit. The only reasonable statement was that there is nothing in Social Security that is anti-family. In truth, there isn't anything in the arguments for Choice that is anti-family, either, but that fact is often buried under histrionic religiosity and patriarchical tendencies. What the Right needs is some good strong ego boundaries (in other words, Mind Your Own Business!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC