Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dana Milbank: And the Verdict on Justice Kennedy Is: Guilty

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:09 PM
Original message
Dana Milbank: And the Verdict on Justice Kennedy Is: Guilty
Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy is a fairly accomplished jurist, but he might want to get himself a good lawyer -- and perhaps a few more bodyguards. Conservative leaders meeting in Washington yesterday for a discussion of "Remedies to Judicial Tyranny" decided that Kennedy, a Ronald Reagan appointee, should be impeached, or worse.

Phyllis Schlafly, doyenne of American conservatism, said Kennedy's opinion forbidding capital punishment for juveniles "is a good ground of impeachment." To cheers and applause from those gathered at a downtown Marriott for a conference on "Confronting the Judicial War on Faith," Schlafly said that Kennedy had not met the "good behavior" requirement for office and that "Congress ought to talk about impeachment."

<snip>

Not to be outdone, lawyer-author Edwin Vieira told the gathering that Kennedy should be impeached because his philosophy, evidenced in his opinion striking down an anti-sodomy statute, "upholds Marxist, Leninist, satanic principles drawn from foreign law." Ominously, Vieira continued by saying his "bottom line" for dealing with the Supreme Court comes from Joseph Stalin. "He had a slogan, and it worked very well for him, whenever he ran into difficulty: 'no man, no problem,' " Vieira said.

The full Stalin quote, for those who don't recognize it, is "Death solves all problems: no man, no problem." Presumably, Vieira had in mind something less extreme than Stalin did and was not actually advocating violence. But then, these are scary times for the judiciary. An anti-judge furor may help confirm President Bush's judicial nominees, but it also has the potential to turn ugly.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38308-2005Apr8.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Indykatie Donating Member (416 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. RW Conservatives
never fail to prove that they are a mean spirited heartless bunch of idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Culture of LIFELESS..
Idiots!

Go Kennedy..who knew?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Recommended for Greatest
These people are really out of control. RW extremists are now starting to devour their own.

Ominously, Vieira continued by saying his "bottom line" for dealing with the Supreme Court comes from Joseph Stalin. "He had a slogan, and it worked very well for him, whenever he ran into difficulty: 'no man, no problem,' " Vieira said...The full Stalin quote, for those who don't recognize it, is "Death solves all problems: no man, no problem."

Wow! The extreme RW are now OPENLY advocating Stalinist solutions to problems!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-08-05 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. What!? Looks like all of Kennedy's kowtowing to the far right has gotten
him exactly nothing. There's a lesson in that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Christian faith says to execute children?
Edited on Sat Apr-09-05 01:07 AM by aquart
As long as they've left the womb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lins the liberal Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. These people are truly insane
Recommended for Greatest.

I can't believe these people have taken over our country, yet are still crying about being an abused minority!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. They decry Marxist policies and Promote Stalin policy to solve them
It's the same Neocon insanity - liberalism brought about Nazism, so let's use Fascism to defeat liberalism, and so it goes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. Someone should report this to the FBI
Edited on Sat Apr-09-05 09:08 AM by Patiod
sounds like he was making a death threat against Viera. "Presumably Vieira had in mind something less extreme than Stalin did and was not actually advocating violence" the article tells us.

In these "post 9/11 times" (as the right is so fond of saying when they're restricting civil rights) I don't think we can be too cautious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
9. They seem to stop just short of "Death to Judges"
The old battleaxe herself, er, the "doyenne of American conservatism"

http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/Pictures/Persons/003706/003706-184564-04.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #9
10.  Phyllis Schlafly-- I saw her on a talk show yesterday-had not seen her
in a while--not that I missed her!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. They brought her back from the dead for this campaign.
This stuff scares the hell out of me. VERY 1930's Germany.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I'm with you, BrklynLiberal
It is truly scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Gaaa - what a waste of oxygen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. And, where the hell is she
In some kind of underground bunker?

Where are the cases of chili and shotgun shells?

http://inside.c-spanarchives.org:8080/cspan/Pictures/Persons/003706/003706-184564-04.jpg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-10-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. Is that background supposed to make her look scholarly?
Edited on Sun Apr-10-05 01:16 AM by LeftyMom
The bookshelves in the background might be more impressive if they were somewhat full and the books on them didn't appear to be Reader's Digest condensed books.

Kind of looks like the set of the Jerrry Springer show. Just before the commercial break, Phyllis revealed that she's really Phillip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. They want to kill children?
Phyllis Schlafly, doyenne of American conservatism, said Kennedy's opinion forbidding capital punishment for juveniles "is a good ground of impeachment."

Did I just read that?

The pary that advocates a 'culture of life' wants to impeach a sitting Supreme Court judge so they can execute children?

My brain just exploded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catt03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. And this
Schlafly called for passage of a quartet of bills in Congress that would remove courts’ power to review religious displays, the Pledge of Allegiance, same-sex marriage and the Boy Scouts. Her speech brought a subtle change in the argument against the courts from emphasizing “activist” judges—it was, after all, inaction by federal judges that doomed Schiavo—to “supremacist” judges. “The Constitution is not what the Supreme Court says it is,” Schlafly asserted.


Didn't one of her children announce they were gay?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Is this about that cult of life thing again?
Impeaching judges for upholding minority status in death penalty cases (Kennedy).

Threatening judges for upholding majority/marital status in a family dispute (Schiavo).

What are they after? Do they want to do away with power of the individual altogether? The state can kill anyone, your parents will always own you, and so on?

What a bunch of lunatics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. There is no end to the horror of these monsters.
It's an ugly irony that they pride themselves so loudly on their extreme patriotism, but they are the ones who are doing all they can to destroy the rule of law and the US constitutional government. Encouraging them is one on the long list of crimes by the Bush cartel. Even stealing elections can't gut the judicial branch fast enough for them, so they are taking their own vile path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC